DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE,PUNE vs. MAHARASHTRA STATE BOARD OF SECONDARY & HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee could not be deprived of legitimate exemption due to an inadvertent error in claiming it under the wrong section. The CIT(A)'s order allowing exemption under Section 10(23C)(iv) was upheld.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Maharashtra State Board of Secondary & Higher Secondary Education, claimed exemption under Section 10(46) of the Income Tax Act. However, the CPC rejected this claim, and the assessee argued before the CIT(A) that it was eligible for exemption under Section 10(23C)(iv). The CIT(A) allowed the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iv).
What were the issues?
Whether an assessee can be denied exemption due to claiming it under a wrong section when eligible under another, and whether the CIT(A) erred in allowing a claim not made in the original return.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders956 citing349 ITR 336 · 2012 · HC
- Sanchit Software and Solutions (P) Ltd. v. CIT56 citing349 ITR 404 · 2012 · HC
- Principal CIT v. Karnataka State Co.19 citing128 Taxmann.com 1 · 2021 · HC
- Desh Bharti Public School Samity v. DCIT3 citing195 ITD 600 · 2022 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune 5. गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy //
Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 21.10.2025 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 23.10.2025 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before the 3 JM/AM Second Member Draft discussed/approved by Second 4 AM/AM Member 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to the Head 9 Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 10(46)
- Seepz Special Economic Zone Authority… vs Exem. Circle 2, MumbaiITA 4134/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- Seepz Special Economic Zone Authority… vs Exem. Circle 2, MumbaiITA 4133/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2013-14
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Mahagun (India) Private Limited, New DelhiITA 381/DEL/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2013-14
- Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 8873/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
- Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 8872/DEL/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026