ASHIRWAD SEVA SAMITI,NASHIK vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

80G(5)(iv)(B) of the Act are not applicable to your case. As such, your present application is liable to be rejected. Please clarify with supporting documents. (ii) It is seen that you have obtained the regular registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(i) of the Act but it seems that you have not submitted a copy of registration

MINHAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

80G of the Act.\n4. Facts of the case in ITA No.403/PUN/2025, in brief, are that the\nassessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 26.09.2023 for\nregistration of the trust under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act.\nWith a view to verify the genuineness of the activities of the assessee and\ncompliance to requirements

MINHAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

80G of the Act.\n4.\nFacts of the case in ITA No.403/PUN/2025, in brief, are that the\nassessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 26.09.2023 for\nregistration of the trust under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act.\nWith a view to verify the genuineness of the activities of the assessee and\ncompliance to requirements

MINHAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

80G of the Act.\n4. Facts of the case in ITA No.403/PUN/2025, in brief, are that the\nassessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 26.09.2023 for\nregistration of the trust under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act.\nWith a view to verify the genuineness of the activities of the assessee and\ncompliance to requirements

MINHAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

80G of the Act.\n4. Facts of the case in ITA No.403/PUN/2025, in brief, are that the\nassessee filed an application in Form No.10AB on 26.09.2023 for\nregistration of the trust under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the Act.\nWith a view to verify the genuineness of the activities of the assessee and\ncompliance to requirements

SHRI VETALESHWAR SHIKSHAN SANSTHA,LATUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION , PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

80G(5) of the IT Act filed on 10.06.2022. ITA No.451/PUN/2025 : 2. According to the Registry, there is a delay in filing of the present appeal. We are satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the affidavit for condonation that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time limit. After hearing

SHRI VETALESHWAR SHIKSHAN SANSTHA,LATUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: SHRI MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)

80G(5) of the IT Act filed on 10.06.2022. ITA No.451/PUN/2025 : 2. According to the Registry, there is a delay in filing of the present appeal. We are satisfied with the reasons mentioned in the affidavit for condonation that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause for not filing the appeal within the prescribed time limit. After hearing

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

iii) approval of the facility by the prescribed authority, which is DSIR\n(iv) allowance of weighted deduction on the expenditure so incurred by the\nassessee.\n9. The provisions nowhere suggest or imply that R&D facility is to be\napproved from a particular date and, in other words, it is nowhere suggested that\ndate of approval only will

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

iii) approval of the facility by the prescribed authority, which is DSIR\n(iv) allowance of weighted deduction on the expenditure so incurred by the\nassessee.\n9. The provisions nowhere suggest or imply that R&D facility is to be\napproved from a particular date and, in other words, it is nowhere suggested that\ndate of approval only will

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

iii) approval of the facility by the prescribed authority, which is DSIR\n(iv) allowance of weighted deduction on the expenditure so incurred by the\nassessee.\n9. The provisions nowhere suggest or imply that R&D facility is to be\napproved from a particular date and, in other words, it is nowhere suggested that\ndate of approval only will

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD vs. ENDURANCE TECHNOLIGIES LIMITED, AURANGABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

iii) approval of the facility by the prescribed authority, which is DSIR\n(iv) allowance of weighted deduction on the expenditure so incurred by the\nassessee.\n9. The provisions nowhere suggest or imply that R&D facility is to be\napproved from a particular date and, in other words, it is nowhere suggested that\ndate of approval only will