BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “TDS”+ Section 36Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai28Pune10Ahmedabad2Kolkata2Delhi1Nagpur1Bangalore1SC1

Key Topics

Section 12A15Section 80G15Section 80G(5)10Exemption9Section 36A5Section 12A(1)(ac)5Section 36A(3)4Section 124Section 1434Addition to Income4TDS

MINHAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 401/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2025
For Appellant: \nDr. K ShivaramFor Respondent: \nShri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 12Section 12ASection 143Section 36A(3)Section 80G

TDS, non-\ndeposit of PF and ESIC within the stipulated period, not making provisions\nfor a retirement benefit of employees as per AS-15 and not charging GST on\nrental income, it was held that such defaults could not be considered as a\nnon-compliance of any other law for time being in force in terms of section\n12AB

MINHAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

3

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 402/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2025
For Appellant: \nDr. K ShivaramFor Respondent: \nShri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 12Section 12ASection 143Section 36A(3)Section 80G

TDS, non-\ndeposit of PF and ESIC within the stipulated period, not making provisions\nfor a retirement benefit of employees as per AS-15 and not charging GST on\nrental income, it was held that such defaults could not be considered as a\nnon-compliance of any other law for time being in force in terms of section\n12AB

MINHAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 403/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2025
For Appellant: \nDr. K ShivaramFor Respondent: \nShri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 12Section 12ASection 143Section 36A(3)Section 80G

TDS, non-\ndeposit of PF and ESIC within the stipulated period, not making provisions\nfor a retirement benefit of employees as per AS-15 and not charging GST on\nrental income, it was held that such defaults could not be considered as a\nnon-compliance of any other law for time being in force in terms of section\n12AB

MINHAJ EDUCATIONAL & WELFARE TRUST,THANE vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, both the appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 404/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jun 2025
For Appellant: \nDr. K ShivaramFor Respondent: \nShri Vishwas S. Mundhe
Section 12Section 12ASection 143Section 36A(3)Section 80G

TDS, non-\ndeposit of PF and ESIC within the stipulated period, not making provisions\nfor a retirement benefit of employees as per AS-15 and not charging GST on\nrental income, it was held that such defaults could not be considered as a\nnon-compliance of any other law for time being in force in terms of section\n12AB

HIDAYA EDUCATION TRUST,BHIWANDI vs. CIT EXEMPTION PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1142/PUN/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Pune16 Dec 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Smt. Deepa KhareFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 36A

36A of the Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950 from the Charity Commissioner has not been furnished. (iii) Trust is engaged in education activity. However, following information/ documents called for vide earlier notice has not been furnished: (1) Details of various institutes / schools / colleges run by the trust with granted/non-granted status. (ii) Copies of affiliation certificates. (iii) Details of institute wise

BRAHMAN SABHA KARVEER,MAHARASHTRA vs. CIT EXEMPTION PUNE, CIT EXEMPTION PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for

ITA 795/PUN/2024[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Aug 2024AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: -None-For Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 13(3)Section 36ASection 41Section 80GSection 80G(5)

TDS returns & Profession Tax Returns filed for the last 3 years. xii. Year-wise details of addition to building fund and other funds with evidence of its source. xiii. Complete details of loans raised for the last 3 years and its utilization for each of the institution / project along with copy of permission under section 36A

ASHIRWAD SEVA SAMITI,NASHIK vs. CIT, EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 106/PUN/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Sanjeev MuthaFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 13(3)Section 36ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iv)

TDS returns & Profession Tax Returns filed for the last 3 years. (xii) Year-wise details of addition to building fund and other funds with evidence of its source. (xiii) Complete details of loans raised for the last 3 years and its utilization for each of the institution / project along with copy of permission under section 36A

AKHIL BHARATIYHA MAHESHWARI EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,PUNE vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2790/PUN/2024[- NA -]Status: DisposedITAT Pune28 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Nikhil MuthaFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)

TDS returns & Profession Tax Returns filed for the last 3 years. (xii) Year-wise details of addition to building fund and other funds with evidence of its source. (xii) Complete details of loans raised for the last 3 years and its utilization for each of the institution project along with copy of permission under section 36A

CENTURY RAYON EDUCATION SOCIETY,PUNE vs. CIT (EXEMP), PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 947/PUN/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune31 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri S.M. BandiFor Respondent: Shri Amol Khairnar
Section 13(3)Section 36ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

TDS returns & Profession Tax Returns filed for the last 3 years. (xii) Year-wise details of addition to building fund and other funds with evidence of its source. (xiii) Complete details of loans raised, if any, for the last 3 years and its utilization for each of the institution / project along with copy of permission under section 36A

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, PUNE vs. DILIP MOTILALJI CHORDIA, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as\nthe Cross Objection filed by the assessee are allowed for\nstatistical purposes

ITA 1486/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune22 Dec 2025AY 2017-18
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250(4)Section 44ASection 96

36A. The hearing with respect to\nthe above-mentioned appeal and Cross-objection was heard before\nYour Honours on 21 August, 2025 and 28th October, 2025. Pursuant\nto the hearing held on 21 August, 2025, the Respondent had filed its\nwritten submission vide letter dated 22nd August, 2025.\nIn addition to the same, the Respondent humbly submits its\nadditional written