BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

20 results for “TDS”+ Section 205clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai302Delhi251Bangalore158Karnataka105Hyderabad73Chennai58Kolkata52Ahmedabad41Raipur37Jaipur27Pune20Chandigarh14Surat13Guwahati11Indore9Patna8Lucknow8Telangana5SC4Cochin4Varanasi4Amritsar3Agra2Nagpur2Rajkot2Panaji1Visakhapatnam1Jodhpur1Jabalpur1Calcutta1Allahabad1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

TDS16Addition to Income16Section 4014Section 194A11Section 14810Exemption10Section 143(3)7Section 143(1)6Section 1546Section 205

HEMANT ENTERPRISES,NASHIK vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 1, NASHIK, NASHIK

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 394/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Vice- & Ms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Deepa Khare-AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.D. Kulkarni, DR
Section 143(1)Section 154Section 199Section 234A

205 of the Act comes into operation and the revenue is barred from recovering the TDS amount once again from the employee from whose income, TDS amount has been deducted. It is pertinent to note that the purpose of issuing TDS certificate under section

WALVEKAR BROTHERS & CO,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(2),, PUNE

6
Deduction6
Section 1955

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 770/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 Aug 2022AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Smt. J.R. ChandekarFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 143(2)Section 192Section 194ASection 194BSection 194CSection 194DSection 194ESection 195Section 196ASection 205

section 205 of the Act comes into operation and it is immaterial as to whether tax deducted at source has been paid to Central Government or not because provisions are made under the Act for recovery of tax deducted at source from the person who has deducted such tax. Similarly, the Hon‟ble Gauhati High Court in the case

AMIT ASHOK CHANDWANI,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1567/PUN/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune12 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1567/Pun/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Amit Ashok Chandwani, Vs. Dcit, Circle-14, Pune. Flat No.6, 4Th Floor, Padumji Villa, Nishat Talkies Lane, 10251025, New Nana Peth, Pune- 411002. Pan : Adnpc2333G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri Pramot S. Shingte Revenue By Shri Deepak Kumar Kedia (Virtual) : Date Of Hearing : 14.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 12.12.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 26.05.2025 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Appellant Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1. On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Cit(А), Nfac Erred In Confirming The Action Of The Ao Of Not Granting Credit For Tcs Of Rs.74,14,161 By One Cromex Liquor Pvt. Ltd. (The Supplier) On The Ground Of It Being Not Reflected In Online Form 26As, Even Though The Appellant Has Paid Such Tcs To The Supplier Along With Respective Bill Payments. The Appellant Prays That The Ao Be Directed To Grant Credit For Tcs.

For Appellant: Shri Pramot S. Shingte
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 205

section 205 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 puts a bar on direct demand against the assessee in such cases and the demand on account of tax credit mismatch in such situations cannot be enforced coercively. 2. However, instances have come to the notice of the Board that these directions are not being strictly followed by the field officers

NALINI TUKARAM NIKAM,PUNE vs. ITO WARD 2(3), PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2747/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr.Manish Borad & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.2747/Pun/2024 Assessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Sharad ShahFor Respondent: Shri Harish Bist
Section 127Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 57

TDS credit when taxed the income. Section 199 of the Act lays down that the tax deducted and paid to the Central government is treated as tax paid and the Rule 37BA lays down the procedure for giving credit for tax deducted and paid to the Central government. Section 205

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,, PUNE vs. FORCE MOTORS LTD.,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1192/PUN/2017[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Mar 2021AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 1192/Pun/2017 नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2004-05

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Mahadevan A.M Krishnan
Section 43B

205 Taxman 79 (Del.)(HC)(Magz.) 5 A.Y.2004-05 The learned D.R. has vehemently supported the order of the learned CIT(A). After considering the submissions of both the parties and the case laws cited by the assessee, we find that the payment of road tax in advance is allowance U/s 43B even pertained to subsequent year. Accordingly, the assessee

M/S KIRAN SANRAN ASSOCIATES,PUNE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PUNE, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 791/PUN/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune09 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Naveen RanderFor Respondent: Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 2Section 263Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 43C

205 Loading * Ready Reckoner Rate (690.90 Sq FT * 1.2 * Rs.6387 per Sq FT) 2 Carpet Area of Non Accessible Terrace * 40% 19,59,174 * Ready Reckoner Rate (766.86 Sq FT * 40% * Rs.6387 per Sq FT) 3 Standard Parking Area * 25% * Ready 2,15,561 Reckoner Rate (135 Sq FT * 25% * Rs.6387 per Sq FT) 4 Sub Total

ANSHUL ANIL GOEL,PUNE vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (1) 1, PUNE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2537/PUN/2024[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Pune27 Jan 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraassessment Year : 2024-25

For Appellant: Shri Sharad A ShahFor Respondent: Shri Ramnath P Murkunde
Section 143(1)Section 206CSection 64

TDS of Rs. 14,53,50,759/- & TCS of RS 25,28,802/-. Out of the total TCS claimed, an amount of Rs. 15,78,602/- collected for self and TCS of Rs. 9,50,200/- was collected in the hands of his Minor child whose income was clubbed with his income. It is seen from

M/S PERSISTENT SYSTEMS LIMITED,PUNE vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Partly Allowed

ITA 692/PUN/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune02 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकरअपीलसं. / Ita No.692/Pun/2022 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 M/S.Persistent Systems Assessment Unit, Income Limited, V Tax Department. “Bhageerath” 402, Senapati S Bapat Road, Pune – 411016. Pan: Aabcp 1209 Q Appellant/ Assessee Respondent /Revenue Assessee By Shri Dhanesh Bafna& Shriaditya Vaidya– Ar’S Revenue By Shri Suhas Kulkarni - Irs Addl Commissioner Of Income Tax Date Of Hearing 26/09/2023 Date Of Pronouncement 02/11/2023 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Assessment Order, Dated 20.07.2022 Under Section 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Read With Section 144B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 For A.Y.2018-19. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: “Ground 1: Order Is Invalid / Non Est  On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Assessment Unit (‘Au’) Has Erred In Passing The Draft Assessment M/S.Persistent Systems Limited [A]

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144(11)Section 144(7)Section 144BSection 144C(6)(C)

205,774 Other method 13 Receipt of insurance claim on behalf 157,355,828 Other method of AE 14 Receipt of guarantee commission 1,846,769 Other method 15 Change back of ESOP cost 2,600,510 Other method 746,44,46,387 8 M/s.Persistent Systems Limited [A] 2.2 The organisation chart of the Persistent System Limited

SG ANALYTICS PRIVATE LIMITED,,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 6,, PUNE

ITA 2198/PUN/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Jun 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 4o

section 195 r.w.s. 40(a)(i) of the Act to disallow the same on account of non-deduction of TDS thereupon. The CIT(A) has granted part relief to the assessee as follows: 5·3 DECISIQN; 1 have perused the assessment order and the submission made by the appellant as above carefully. I find from the assessment order that

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 6,, PUNE vs. S.G. ANALYTICS PVT.LTD,, PUNE

ITA 2390/PUN/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune08 Jun 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Nikhil PathakFor Respondent: Shri S.P. Walimbe
Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 4o

section 195 r.w.s. 40(a)(i) of the Act to disallow the same on account of non-deduction of TDS thereupon. The CIT(A) has granted part relief to the assessee as follows: 5·3 DECISIQN; 1 have perused the assessment order and the submission made by the appellant as above carefully. I find from the assessment order that

SAMARTH SAHAKARI BANK LTD ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE - 2 , SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 518/PUN/2020[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

MANDHESHWARI URBAN DEVELOPMENT CO-OP BANK LTD,,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -1,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1153/PUN/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD,,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 1770/PUN/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

SOLAPUR SIDDESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK LTD ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -1 , SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 517/PUN/2020[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

SOLAPUR SIDDESHWAR SAHAKARI BANK ,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 516/PUN/2020[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

VYAPARI SAHAKARI BANK MARYADIT,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(4), SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 520/PUN/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD,PUNE vs. ACIT., CIR-2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 24/PUN/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

SOLAPUR JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LTD.,,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD - 2(4), SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 25/PUN/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

SAMARTH SAHAKARI BANK LTD,SOLAPUR vs. ASST . COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -2 , SOLAPUR, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 519/PUN/2020[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur

VYAPARI SAHAKARI BANK MARYADIT,SOLAPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE -2, SOLAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 521/PUN/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jul 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S. S. Viswanethra Ravisl.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Shingte
Section 148Section 194ASection 40

205, East Mangalwar Peth, Head Office, Solapur-413002. PAN : AABAS6216L 5-6 518/PUN/2020 Samarth Sahakari Bank ACIT, Circle-2, 2010-11 519/PUN/2020 Ltd., Solapur. 2011-12 2, Antrolikar Shopping Centre, Datta Chowk, Solapur- 413007. PAN : AAAJS1390P 7-8 520/PUN/2020 Vyapari Sahakari Bank ITO, Ward-2(4)/ 2012-13 521/PUN/2020 Maryadit, Solapur/ ACIT, 2013-14 452, West Mangalwar Circle-2, Solapur