BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “TDS”+ Section 167B(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai12Ahmedabad3Cuttack3Lucknow2Hyderabad2Pune2Visakhapatnam1SC1Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 405Section 194C3TDS2Disallowance2

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 3(1),, PUNE vs. SHRADDHA & PRASAD JOINT VENTURE,, PUNE

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2665/PUN/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune17 May 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal, Vp & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No. 2665/Pun/2017 धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2014-15 The Income Tax Officer Ward-3(1), Pune. .......अपीलाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

For Appellant: Shri Kishore PhadkeFor Respondent: Shri Deepak Garg
Section 194CSection 40

1. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) is contrary to law and to the facts and circumstances of the case. 2 A.Y.2014-15 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in holding that in absence of any contract or sub-contract work by the Joint

INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 6(3),, PUNE vs. SUBHASH & B.T. PATIL & SONS & N.V.KHAROTE CONSTRUCTIONS PVT.LTD,, PUNE

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1060/PUN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Pune13 May 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Ulhas KiniFor Respondent: Shri Sardar Singh Meena, CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 194CSection 40

1 to 5 of the appeal raised by the appellant are allowed for the year under consideration.” 8. We also find that Tribunal in assessee‟s own case for A.Y. 2013-14 in ITA No. 1505/PUN/2017 has decided the issue in favour of the assessee placing reliance again on assessee‟s own case for A.Y. 2012-13 wherein