BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

13 results for “disallowance”+ Section 46clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,882Delhi4,378Bangalore1,418Chennai1,343Kolkata1,107Ahmedabad646Jaipur478Hyderabad460Indore336Pune320Raipur267Chandigarh238Surat220Rajkot162Amritsar159Nagpur148Cochin116Karnataka115Visakhapatnam102Lucknow99Cuttack67Panaji63Allahabad48Calcutta48Guwahati46Agra40Ranchi37Jodhpur36SC36Telangana30Dehradun22Varanasi19Jabalpur13Patna13Kerala8Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana2H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Orissa1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 25021Section 143(3)15Deduction11Section 40A(3)9Section 1479Section 2637Section 376Section 80I6Disallowance6Addition to Income

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN.LTD.,PATNA vs. CIT (APPEAL), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 335/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

46,190/- which was held to be not for the purpose of business, the same was disallowed. Further, a sum of ₹71,91,44,620/- claimed under the head 'other income' in the profit and loss account and on which deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act was also claimed and which was bifurcated into Own Fund and RCD Fund

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

6
TDS6
Section 36(1)(va)4
ITA 331/PAT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

46,190/- which was held to be not for the purpose of business, the same was disallowed. Further, a sum of ₹71,91,44,620/- claimed under the head 'other income' in the profit and loss account and on which deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act was also claimed and which was bifurcated into Own Fund and RCD Fund

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 332/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

46,190/- which was held to be not for the purpose of business, the same was disallowed. Further, a sum of ₹71,91,44,620/- claimed under the head 'other income' in the profit and loss account and on which deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act was also claimed and which was bifurcated into Own Fund and RCD Fund

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIR-2, P)ATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 333/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

46,190/- which was held to be not for the purpose of business, the same was disallowed. Further, a sum of ₹71,91,44,620/- claimed under the head 'other income' in the profit and loss account and on which deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act was also claimed and which was bifurcated into Own Fund and RCD Fund

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, COR-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 334/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

46,190/- which was held to be not for the purpose of business, the same was disallowed. Further, a sum of ₹71,91,44,620/- claimed under the head 'other income' in the profit and loss account and on which deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act was also claimed and which was bifurcated into Own Fund and RCD Fund

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,PATNA vs. ITO WARD 2(1) PATNA, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 330/PAT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

46,190/- which was held to be not for the purpose of business, the same was disallowed. Further, a sum of ₹71,91,44,620/- claimed under the head 'other income' in the profit and loss account and on which deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act was also claimed and which was bifurcated into Own Fund and RCD Fund

SIS LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 341/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna16 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI SONJOY SARMA (Judicial Member)

Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

disallowance under section 36(1)(va) of the Act cannot be made on the ground that the appellant had failed to rectify the reporting error on ESI/PF Portal. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, alter or vary, any of the aforesaid grounds of appeal before or at the time of hearing of the appeal.” 2. The Ld. Counsel

THE SIWAN CENTRAL CO.-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,SIWAN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 29/PAT/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Sept 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 147Section 250Section 36Section 40aSection 43D

section 36(viia) of the I.T. Act whereas the entire bad debt is an allowable deduction. 15. For that the disallowance of Rs.3,20,487/- and additions of Rs.2,95,62,024/-sustained by the Ld. CIT(A) are wrong, illegal and unjustified on the facts and in the circumstances of the appellant’s case. 16. For that the order

THE SIWAN CENTRAL CO.-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,SIWAN vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, MUZAFFARPUR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 30/PAT/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna15 Sept 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 147Section 250Section 36Section 40aSection 43D

section 36(viia) of the I.T. Act whereas the entire bad debt is an allowable deduction. 15. For that the disallowance of Rs.3,20,487/- and additions of Rs.2,95,62,024/-sustained by the Ld. CIT(A) are wrong, illegal and unjustified on the facts and in the circumstances of the appellant’s case. 16. For that the order

DCIT, CIRCLE-1, PATNA vs. INDIA CARRIERS PVT LTD, PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 86/PAT/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Jul 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Rajesh Kumar

Section 40A(3)

46,279/- was paid other than by cash mode and accordingly the difference between the two figures was disallowed on the ground payments in contravention of section

ANIL KUMAR,NALANDA vs. ITO, WARD- 2 (3), BIHARSHARIF

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 361/PAT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna03 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. No. 361/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Anil Kumar National Faceless Assessment Centre M/S Raj Trading Company, Nfac, Delhi Harnaut, Nalanda, Patna-803110 Vs Bihar [Pan : Azopc268H] अपीलार्थी/ (Appellant) प्रत्‍यर्थी/ (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri AK Rastogi, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Ashwani Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 194JSection 40

46 days. The assessee had filed an application for condonation of delay. Perusal of the same indicates that the assessee did not came to know about the impugned order as he is not well versed with the technology advancement about the notices of hearing given through mails. When the ITA No.361/Pat.2023 Anil Kumar; A.Y. 2014-15 assessee was asked

NORTH BIHAR POWER DISTRUBUTION CO. LTD,PATNA vs. PR. CIT-1, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 224/PAT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Ankit Kumar,FCAFor Respondent: Smt. Rinku Singh, Addl. CIT, DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 263(2)

section (1) after the expiry of two 3 North Bihar Power Distribution Co. Ltd. AY 2017-18 years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed.” 4. Ground 4: The learned PCIT has erred in law, and passed an order u/s 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 by non-considering replies

ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, PATNA vs. RISHAV DUTTA, PATNA

In the result, appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 51/PAT/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna06 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18

For Appellant: Smt. Rinku Singh, CIT, DRFor Respondent: Shri M. Kr. Mashi, CA
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 80C

disallowance of Rs. 1 50,000/- claimed by the assessee u/s 80C of the I. T. Act:- 2 Rishav Dutta, AY: 2017-18 (a) by admitting fresh evidences/documents such as paper book containing books of account and other documents produced before him without providing reasonable opportunity to the A.O. to examine such evidences in violation of Rule