BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2, PATNA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the CIT(A) and remitted the matters back to him. The CIT(A) is to consider the newly filed documents and re-adjudicate all grounds of appeal, including additional grounds.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed six appeals against orders of the CIT(A) concerning various assessment years. The appeals involved common issues, including disallowance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenses and deduction claims under Section 80-IA. New documents were filed before the Tribunal that were not considered by the lower authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether CSR expenses and interest income for Section 80-IA deduction were correctly disallowed, and whether the CIT(A) should consider newly submitted documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 263,Section 37,Section 80IA,Section 115JB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pandian Chemicals Ltd. v. CIT353 citing262 ITR 278 · 2003 · SC
- CIT v. Sterling Foods311 citing104 Taxmann 204 · 1999 · SC · Read judgment
- Cambay Electric Supply Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT245 citing224 ITR 122 · 1978 · Read judgment
- CIT v. Reliance Energy Limited47 citing127 Taxmann.com 69 · 2021 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT-I v. Reliance Energy Ltd.28 citing441 ITR 346 · 2022 · SC
- AVM Cine Products v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax12 citing123 Taxmann.com 41 · 2021 · HC
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. PEC Ltd.10 citing291 Taxmann 281 · 2023 · HC
- Kripa Chemicals (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT8 citing88 ITD 200 · 2004 · ITAT
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Steel Authority of India Ltd.7 citing148 Taxmann.com 132 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- ACIT v. Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd.6 citing107 Taxmann.com 497 · 2019
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH AT KOLKATA
Before: SHRI SONJOY SARMA & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
Bihar State Road Development ACIT, Circle-2, Patna Corporation Limited (BSRDCL) Vs. Income Tax Department, NFAC, Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AADCB7567M Appearances: Assessee represented by : Abhi Sarkar, AR. Department represented by : Rajat Datta, CIT. Date of concluding the hearing : 15-July-2025 Date of pronouncing the order : 24-July-2025 ORDER PER BENCH: These six appeals filed by the assessee are against the separate orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Bihar State Road Development Corporation… vs ACIT, Cir-2, P)AtnaPatna24 Jul 2025Remanded
Also relies on Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. PEC Ltd. and 4 other authorities
The Tribunal set aside the orders of the CIT(A) and remitted the matters back to him. The CIT(A) is to consider the newly filed documents and re-adjudicate all grounds of appeal, including additional grounds.
- Vitp Private Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT., Circle8(1), HyderabadHyderabad8 Oct 2025Remanded
Also relies on CIT-I v. Reliance Energy Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal found that the PCIT did not examine the merits of the issues raised by the assessee and incorrectly remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal noted that the deduction under Section 80-IA is ...
- ACIT, Range-I, Lucknow vs M/S Apco Infratech Pvt. Ltd., LucknowLucknow2 Apr 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT-I v. Reliance Energy Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal agreed with the Appellate Authority that Section 80AB deals with the computation of deductions based on net income. The Tribunal also noted that the aggregate of deductions under Chapter VI-A cannot exceed t...
- Qubix Business Park Private Limited, Pune vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…Pune6 Jan 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT-I v. Reliance Energy Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal found that neither the assessee nor the AO conducted a proper benchmarking analysis for the interest paid on the loan. Therefore, the matter was set aside for de novo adjudication by the AO/TPO after providi...
- Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, CC-1… vs Apco Infratech Pvt. Ltd., Vibhuti Khand…Lucknow2 Apr 2025Partly Allowed
Also relies on CIT-I v. Reliance Energy Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal decided that interest income earned on FDRs kept for release of security/retention money is eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). It also held that no disallowance is attracted under Section 14A for ...
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026