BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

194 results for “TDS”+ Section 250(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,516Delhi852Bangalore573Kolkata453Chennai347Pune295Raipur276Ahmedabad249Patna194Hyderabad160Jaipur156Cochin124Nagpur108Chandigarh106Karnataka85Indore78Rajkot73Amritsar73Lucknow69Surat67Visakhapatnam47Guwahati45Panaji41Cuttack32Jodhpur27Jabalpur22Ranchi20Agra19Dehradun16Allahabad10Varanasi6SC3Telangana3Rajasthan1

Key Topics

TDS100Section 1548

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,PATNA vs. ITO WARD 2(1) PATNA, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 330/PAT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) for Assessment Year 2012-13 by the Ld. First Appellate Authority, viz. the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) at National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, is bad both in law and on facts. 3. For that the order of assessment dated 02/08/2016 bearing DIN & Order No: Nil passed under

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, COR-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Showing 1–20 of 194 · Page 1 of 10

...
ITA 334/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) for Assessment Year 2012-13 by the Ld. First Appellate Authority, viz. the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) at National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, is bad both in law and on facts. 3. For that the order of assessment dated 02/08/2016 bearing DIN & Order No: Nil passed under

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIR-2, P)ATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 333/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) for Assessment Year 2012-13 by the Ld. First Appellate Authority, viz. the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) at National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, is bad both in law and on facts. 3. For that the order of assessment dated 02/08/2016 bearing DIN & Order No: Nil passed under

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 332/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) for Assessment Year 2012-13 by the Ld. First Appellate Authority, viz. the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) at National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, is bad both in law and on facts. 3. For that the order of assessment dated 02/08/2016 bearing DIN & Order No: Nil passed under

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN.LTD.,PATNA vs. CIT (APPEAL), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 335/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) for Assessment Year 2012-13 by the Ld. First Appellate Authority, viz. the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) at National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, is bad both in law and on facts. 3. For that the order of assessment dated 02/08/2016 bearing DIN & Order No: Nil passed under

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 331/PAT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the Act) for Assessment Year 2012-13 by the Ld. First Appellate Authority, viz. the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) at National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, is bad both in law and on facts. 3. For that the order of assessment dated 02/08/2016 bearing DIN & Order No: Nil passed under

GUPTA JI BROTHERS RICE PRIVATE LIMITED,DALMIA NAGAR vs. DCIT CIRCLE-3, GAYA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 33/PAT/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna13 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 194CSection 194HSection 250Section 37(1)Section 40

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter ‘the Act’), passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi (hereafter ‘the Ld. CIT(A)], vide order dated 21.12.2022. 1.1 In this case, the assessee filed its return of income on 26.11.2014 for the assessment year under consideration and after detailed I.T.A. No. 33/Pat/2023 Gupta

HARIHAR PRASAD,PATNA vs. ITO WARD 4 (4), PATNA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 268/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna20 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 54BSection 54FSection 96

250 of the Income Tax Act. 3. For that the computation of capital gain and levy of tax against the appellant of Rs.2,41,50,000/- is bad and illegal in view of the fact that as per the notification/press release issued by the executive engineer, PWD, Hilsa, Nalanda, the land in question was of agriculture i.e., Dhanhar

PUNAM HISARIA,SITAMARHI vs. DC/AC, CIRCLE-03, DARBH, DARBH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 80/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. No.80/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Punam Hisaria ………. Appellant (Pan: Abupa3945R)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 250Section 40

250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in short the “Act”) by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal), Patna-3 [in short Ld. “CIT(A)”] dated 25.01.2023 arising out of the assessment order framed u/s 143(3) of the Act by DC/AC, circle-3, Darbh dated 28.12.2019. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: I.T.A. No. 80/Pat/2023

RAVINDRA KUMAR,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-4(5), PATNA

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 474/PAT/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna20 Mar 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 143Section 143(1)

TDS were deducted on individual PAN, therefore, the assessee had filed statement of deduction of tax on individual pan. The return of the appellant was processed by CPC and 2 Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Rabindra Kumar order under section 143 (1) (a) Was passed. In the intimation, the whole of the contract receipt were taken as income under other source

BIJAY KUMAR SARAF,DALDALI BAZAR, MUZAFFARPUR vs. DC/AC CIRCLE 1,MUZFFARPUR, IT-OFFICE, POLICE LINE, SIKANDERPUR MUZZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 205/PAT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194(7)Section 194C(6)Section 250

250 of the I.T act, 1961(herein referred to as 'the act'). 2. For that the grounds of appeals are without prejudice to one another. 3. For that the learned commissioner of income tax (Appeals) had erred in consideration of the fact and the law that the notice u/s 148 of the act had been served to the appellant

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 94/PAT/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

4 appeals which are delayed by 39 days. For the sake of convenience, the condonation petition filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 is extracted as under: 2 ITA Nos. 91-94/Pat/2021 Shiv Shankar Singh Contract Pvt. Ltd. “1) That an appeal against the order passed under section 250 by NFAC, Delhi uploaded on 25/08/2021

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 93/PAT/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

4 appeals which are delayed by 39 days. For the sake of convenience, the condonation petition filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 is extracted as under: 2 ITA Nos. 91-94/Pat/2021 Shiv Shankar Singh Contract Pvt. Ltd. “1) That an appeal against the order passed under section 250 by NFAC, Delhi uploaded on 25/08/2021

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 92/PAT/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

4 appeals which are delayed by 39 days. For the sake of convenience, the condonation petition filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 is extracted as under: 2 ITA Nos. 91-94/Pat/2021 Shiv Shankar Singh Contract Pvt. Ltd. “1) That an appeal against the order passed under section 250 by NFAC, Delhi uploaded on 25/08/2021

SHIV SHANKAR SINGH CONTRACT PVT LTD,GOPALGANJ vs. ITO, TDS, MUZAFFAPUR

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 91/PAT/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna14 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI SONJOY SARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI (Accountant Member)

Section 133ASection 194CSection 250Section 253(3)

4 appeals which are delayed by 39 days. For the sake of convenience, the condonation petition filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15 is extracted as under: 2 ITA Nos. 91-94/Pat/2021 Shiv Shankar Singh Contract Pvt. Ltd. “1) That an appeal against the order passed under section 250 by NFAC, Delhi uploaded on 25/08/2021

MD IFTAKHAR ALAM,ARARIA vs. ITO, PURNEA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 389/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 194HSection 250Section 69A

section 250 of Income Tax Act 1961 and passed impugned an order on 12.03.2024 confirming addition of I.T.A. No.: 389/PAT/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Md. Iftakhar Alam. Rs.23,01,901 subject to verify the claim of assessee that only Rs.13,42,000 has only been deposited on behalf of the several accounts holders during the period of demonetization

DINESH KUMAR,PATNA vs. ITO WARD (5), PATNA

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 427/PAT/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Patna28 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishrai.T.A. No.427/Pat/2024 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Dinesh Kumar……………………….....…..…………………....Appellant C/O Bhurendra Prasad, Near B D Public School, Buddha Colony, Patna – 800001. [Pan: Bxbpk1456M] Vs. Ito, Ward-5, Patna…………. ….…….…............................…..…..... Respondent Appearances By: Shri Shailendra Sinha, Ar Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Ashwani Kumar, Sr. Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : January 27, 2025 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : January 28, 2025 आदेश / Order Per Sonjoy Sarma: The Present Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 31.03.2024 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Jaipur [Hereinafter Referred To As ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed His Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2016-17 By Showing Total Income Of Rs.2,71,810/-. The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For Scrutiny Under Cass Followed By Notices Issued U/S 143(2) & 142(1) Of The Act. The Assessing Officer Asked The Assessee To Produce Books Of Accounts, Ledger, Cash Book Etc. Before Him But The Assessee Did Not Comply. Accordingly, The Assessing Officer After Verification Of Return Of Income Found That The Assessee Had Filed Balance Sheet Showing Gross Total Income Of Rs.36,00,712/- & The Assessee Incurred Miscellaneous

Section 143(2)Section 194Section 249(3)Section 250

250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income for the assessment year 2016-17 by showing total income of Rs.2,71,810/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny under CASS followed by notices issued

MAHANT PANDEY,ROHTAS vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 181/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271ASection 271FSection 272A(1)(d)

section 69A of the Act and the judicial pronouncement in the case of Chuharmal vs. CIT (1988) 172 ITR 250 (SC) and made an addition of ₹1,25,24,480/- u/s 69A of the Act for the cash deposits in the bank account maintained with the Bank of Baroda which remained unexplained. An addition of ₹4,35,720/- appearing

MAHANT PANDEY,ROHTAS vs. NFAC, DELHI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 182/PAT/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna21 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 271ASection 271FSection 272A(1)(d)

section 69A of the Act and the judicial pronouncement in the case of Chuharmal vs. CIT (1988) 172 ITR 250 (SC) and made an addition of ₹1,25,24,480/- u/s 69A of the Act for the cash deposits in the bank account maintained with the Bank of Baroda which remained unexplained. An addition of ₹4,35,720/- appearing

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DUMRAON BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed”

ITA 192/PAT/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Hon’Ble(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

4. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has relied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of “Fatehraj Singhvi vs. Union of India” 73 Taxmann.com 252 order dated 26.08.2016, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has held that the amendment in section 200A by way of insertion of clause (c) is prospective only with