BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN.LTD.,PATNA vs. CIT (APPEAL), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

3)/147 of the Act shows that the assessee was found to have claimed deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act on interest income and some other income credited under the head ‘other income’ which were not eligible for deduction as per explanation of section 80-IA(4) of the Act and accordingly, a notice

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIR-2, P)ATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

3)/147 of the Act shows that the assessee was found to have claimed deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act on interest income and some other income credited under the head ‘other income’ which were not eligible for deduction as per explanation of section 80-IA(4) of the Act and accordingly, a notice

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, COR-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

3)/147 of the Act shows that the assessee was found to have claimed deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act on interest income and some other income credited under the head ‘other income’ which were not eligible for deduction as per explanation of section 80-IA(4) of the Act and accordingly, a notice

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

3)/147 of the Act shows that the assessee was found to have claimed deduction u/s 80- IA of the Act on interest income and some other income credited under the head ‘other income’ which were not eligible for deduction as per explanation of section 80-IA(4) of the Act and accordingly, a notice

ASHISH RANJAN,DARBHANGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DARBHANGA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

200 and 201 of the Act. However, in the present case\nthe employer is already under liquidation. Therefore, the said action\nwas also could not be taken against the employer. In our opinion, the\nnon-deposit of TDS on the part of the employer cannot be slapped on\nthe assessee more so no action against the employer can be taken

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,DANGRA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KHATANGI (KURTHA) BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KHATANGI (KURTHA) BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KURWA BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,BALGUDAR BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,KHATANGI (KURTHA) BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule

DAKSHIN BIHAR GRAMIN BANK,MANANPUR BRANCH vs. ACIT, CPC, TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stand dismissed

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Sonjoy Sarmaassessment Year: 2013-14 Dakshin Bihar Gramin Bank, Acit, Cpc,Tds, Sono Branch Vs. Ghaziabad. Pan-Aaead5069K अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

TDS) in respect of certain payments. As per the provisions of section 200(3) of the Act read with Rule