BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

61 results for “TDS”+ Section 10(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,711Mumbai4,394Bangalore2,358Chennai1,774Kolkata1,052Pune914Hyderabad647Ahmedabad610Jaipur427Raipur355Chandigarh299Nagpur226Indore212Cochin195Karnataka180Visakhapatnam172Lucknow138Surat134Rajkot130Jodhpur83Cuttack65Amritsar64Patna61Ranchi54Agra46Panaji44Dehradun44Telangana44Guwahati43Jabalpur28SC22Allahabad17Kerala15Calcutta12Varanasi8Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana4Orissa3J&K3Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Bombay1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 26384Section 153A56Section 25047Section 143(3)45TDS35Addition to Income28Section 14725Limitation/Time-bar20Section 142(1)17Section 127

BIJAY KUMAR SARAF,DALDALI BAZAR, MUZAFFARPUR vs. DC/AC CIRCLE 1,MUZFFARPUR, IT-OFFICE, POLICE LINE, SIKANDERPUR MUZZAFFARPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 205/PAT/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna30 Jan 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194(7)Section 194C(6)Section 250

5) of section 194C as the aggregate payment did not exceed ₹ 75,000/-. Further, as per sub-section (6), in the case of the contractors owning 10 or less goods carriages at any time during the previous year and on his furnishing a declaration to that effect along ITA No.: 205/PAT/2025 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Bijay Kumar Saraf. with

Showing 1–20 of 61 · Page 1 of 4

16
Deduction16
Disallowance14

DHARMAVIR KUMAR,PATNA vs. DC/AC CIRCLE 4, PATNA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 70/PAT/2025[2016-17]Status: HeardITAT Patna09 Dec 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vp & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am Dharmavir Kumar Dc/Acit, Circle-4, C/O Naseeb Prasad, Income Tax Department, Lok Paithaninathpur,Narayan Chak, Nayak Jai Prakash Bhavan, New Vs. Phulwari. Dak Bunglow Road, Bihar-800002 Patna-800001, Bihar (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Avzpk4382P Assessee By : Shri Sudeep Sinha, Ar Revenue By : Shri Md. A.H. Chowdhary, Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.12.2025

For Appellant: Shri Sudeep Sinha, ARFor Respondent: Shri Md. A.H. Chowdhary, DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 48Section 49Section 50CSection 96

TDS was also deducted under Section 194LA of the Income- tax Act, 1961 (the Act). Though the assessee claimed the income to be exempt under Section 10(37) of the Act. However, no evidences were produced before the learned Assessing Officer. Finally, the learned Assessing Officer added the same on the ground that no documentary evidences were filed to substantiate

PUNAM HISARIA,SITAMARHI vs. DC/AC, CIRCLE-03, DARBH, DARBH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 80/PAT/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna09 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A. No.80/Pat/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Punam Hisaria ………. Appellant (Pan: Abupa3945R)

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 194C(7)Section 250Section 40

TDS was required to deducted as per section 194C(6) of the Act. However, the Ld. CIT(A) has not considered these details and has confirmed the action of the AO. 5(b). As regards the addition of Rs.45,000/- for unexplained SBNs deposit during the demonetization period a certificate has been placed on record issued by Canara Bank stating

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,PATNA vs. ACIT, COR-2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 334/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

TDS. 10. For that the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) as well as the Ld. assessing officer has erred in disallowing Rs.66,47,34,169/- on the account of deduction claimed u/s 80IA of the Act due to interest income from Fixed Deposit, Saving Account and other income. 11. For that the appellant shall place any other point/points

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,PATNA vs. ITO WARD 2(1) PATNA, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 330/PAT/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

TDS. 10. For that the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) as well as the Ld. assessing officer has erred in disallowing Rs.66,47,34,169/- on the account of deduction claimed u/s 80IA of the Act due to interest income from Fixed Deposit, Saving Account and other income. 11. For that the appellant shall place any other point/points

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN.LTD.,PATNA vs. CIT (APPEAL), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 335/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

TDS. 10. For that the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) as well as the Ld. assessing officer has erred in disallowing Rs.66,47,34,169/- on the account of deduction claimed u/s 80IA of the Act due to interest income from Fixed Deposit, Saving Account and other income. 11. For that the appellant shall place any other point/points

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 331/PAT/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

TDS. 10. For that the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) as well as the Ld. assessing officer has erred in disallowing Rs.66,47,34,169/- on the account of deduction claimed u/s 80IA of the Act due to interest income from Fixed Deposit, Saving Account and other income. 11. For that the appellant shall place any other point/points

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPN. LTD.,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE 2, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 332/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

TDS. 10. For that the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) as well as the Ld. assessing officer has erred in disallowing Rs.66,47,34,169/- on the account of deduction claimed u/s 80IA of the Act due to interest income from Fixed Deposit, Saving Account and other income. 11. For that the appellant shall place any other point/points

BIHAR STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD,PATNA vs. ACIT, CIR-2, P)ATNA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 333/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna24 Jul 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sonjoy Sarma & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 37Section 80I

TDS. 10. For that the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) as well as the Ld. assessing officer has erred in disallowing Rs.66,47,34,169/- on the account of deduction claimed u/s 80IA of the Act due to interest income from Fixed Deposit, Saving Account and other income. 11. For that the appellant shall place any other point/points

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1/PAT/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 May 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 194HSection 40

section 40(a)(ia) on the ground that TDS was not deducted. The assessee has filed evidence, copy of the return of Dr. Sitasaran Singh for A.Y. 2012- 13 with regard to payment of Rs.3,38,970/-. In A.Y. 2012-13, similarly copy of the return of Ravi Lochan Singh HUF for showing that rental income received from the assessee

RAVI LOCHAN SINGH,PATNA vs. ITO, WARD-5(1), PATNA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 2/PAT/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 May 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 194HSection 40

section 40(a)(ia) on the ground that TDS was not deducted. The assessee has filed evidence, copy of the return of Dr. Sitasaran Singh for A.Y. 2012- 13 with regard to payment of Rs.3,38,970/-. In A.Y. 2012-13, similarly copy of the return of Ravi Lochan Singh HUF for showing that rental income received from the assessee

I.T.O. vs. M/S KUMAR CONSTRUCLTION,

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 10/PAT/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Patna17 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 271(1)(b)Section 40A(3)

TDS has not been deducted on aforementioned amount. ” 15. As per Sec. 40(a)(ia), if any rent is liable for tax deduction u/s 1941 and tax has not been deducted, the expense is not allowable. Therefore, Rs. 1,43,10,424/- is disallowed u/s 40(a)(ia) and added back to the income of the assessee. It is pertinent

THE BRANCH MANAGER, SBI, SECRETARIAT BRANCH,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 12/PAT/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 10Section 139Section 192Section 201

TDS was ought to be deducted in the taxable income and paid the taxes due of such income, then, the payer would not be held in default as per Section 201. The controversy in above aspect would go down to a very brief issue namely if it is verified, whether the payee has included interest income received from the assessee

THE BRANCH MANAGER, SBI, SECRETARIAT BRANCH,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 14/PAT/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 10Section 139Section 192Section 201

TDS was ought to be deducted in the taxable income and paid the taxes due of such income, then, the payer would not be held in default as per Section 201. The controversy in above aspect would go down to a very brief issue namely if it is verified, whether the payee has included interest income received from the assessee

THE BRANCH MANAGER, SBI, SECRETARIAT BRANCH,PATNA vs. ACIT, TDS CIRCLE, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 13/PAT/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 Aug 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(Kz) & Shri Rajesh Kumar

Section 10Section 139Section 192Section 201

TDS was ought to be deducted in the taxable income and paid the taxes due of such income, then, the payer would not be held in default as per Section 201. The controversy in above aspect would go down to a very brief issue namely if it is verified, whether the payee has included interest income received from the assessee

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 329/PAT/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

10. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT was not justified rather grossly erred in not adjudicating the issues involved in the proceeding u/s. 263 of the Act on merit when all the material facts and evidences relevant to the assessment were on record at the time of hearing. 11. For that

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT (CENTRAL), PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 322/PAT/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

10. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT was not justified rather grossly erred in not adjudicating the issues involved in the proceeding u/s. 263 of the Act on merit when all the material facts and evidences relevant to the assessment were on record at the time of hearing. 11. For that

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 323/PAT/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

10. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT was not justified rather grossly erred in not adjudicating the issues involved in the proceeding u/s. 263 of the Act on merit when all the material facts and evidences relevant to the assessment were on record at the time of hearing. 11. For that

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 325/PAT/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

10. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT was not justified rather grossly erred in not adjudicating the issues involved in the proceeding u/s. 263 of the Act on merit when all the material facts and evidences relevant to the assessment were on record at the time of hearing. 11. For that

NALANDA ENGICON PVT. LTD, PATNA,PATNA vs. PR. CIT CENTRAL, PATNA

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed as per terms indicated hereinabove

ITA 326/PAT/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Patna12 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarmai.T.A. Nos.322 To 329/Pat/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 To 2021-22

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263

10. For that on the fact and in circumstances of the case the Pr. CIT was not justified rather grossly erred in not adjudicating the issues involved in the proceeding u/s. 263 of the Act on merit when all the material facts and evidences relevant to the assessment were on record at the time of hearing. 11. For that