GUALA CLOSURES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,PANAJI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(1), PANAJI
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose
ITA 344/PAN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji02 Apr 2026AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri G D Padmahshalii T A.No.344/Pan/2017 (A.Y.2013-14 ) Guala Closures(India) Vs. I T O Ward1(1), Private Limited, Aaykar Bhavan, D-1, Sesa Ghor, Edc, Patto, 20,Edc Complex, Panjim-403001. Patto, Goa. Panaji-403001, Goa Pan/Gir No.:Aaacg4447J Appellant .. Respondent
For Appellant: Shri.Niraj Sheth. ARFor Respondent: Shri.Renga Ranjan.CIT DR
Section 115Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 2(43)Section 4Section 90
34) of the Act, since the burden of taxation has been shifted to the company distributing the dividend, from the shareholder. While the DDT is a tax payable by the company, and not the shareholders, in pith and substance, it is a tax on dividends that is income of the shareholders.
59. We must also note that BFAR has grossly
