M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

9 (SC) ITA/83/2010 REPORTABLE Page 31 of 60 transaction was an adventure in the nature of trade or not and the answer to the question would depend in each case on the relevant factors and circumstances proved therein which will determine the character of the transactions. In support of such contention, reliance was placed on the decision of this Court

MAHESWAR PANDA vs. I.T.O., WARD-2(1)

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY

9,72,000/- (v) Loss of love and affection = Rs.25,000/- (vi) Funeral and transportation expenses = Rs.25,000/- Total Compensation Awarded = (iv+v+vi) Rs.10,22,000/- Accordingly, this issue is decided in favour of petitioners and against the respondents. VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.02.09 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document

PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S.UTKAL ALUMINA INTERNATIONAL LTD.

Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

transfer by way of mortgage the urban land bearing No. A-I, Radhey Puri, Delhi-51. DW-2 22. Copy of Grant of mortgage permission in respect of plot no.8, Sector B &C for which loan has been sanctioned for construction of building thereon. DW-2 23. Copy of No objection certificate to mortgage the plot no.8, Sector

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.AHINSA VINIMAY PVT.LTD.

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in seeking exact comparability, which searching for comparable companies of the assessee under TNMM whereas the requirement of law and international jurisprudence require seeking similar comparable companies? 2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case