BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,560Delhi2,498Kolkata1,028Chennai686Jaipur638Ahmedabad514Bangalore419Hyderabad365Indore257Chandigarh249Surat222Rajkot189Pune179Cochin147Raipur145Nagpur138Amritsar105Visakhapatnam83Guwahati77Lucknow61Calcutta54Allahabad50Agra49Jodhpur47Cuttack39Patna34Panaji33Ranchi32Dehradun18Karnataka16Telangana13Varanasi12Jabalpur11SC8Rajasthan4Orissa3Gauhati1Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 685Addition to Income3Section 692

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. ODISHA CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD.

ITA/167/2018HC Orissa30 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 68

unexplained investment under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as “the Act”). The amounts received

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,BHUBANESWAR vs. KUNTALA MOHAPATRA

ITA/10/2024HC Orissa15 Apr 2024

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY

Section 132(4)Section 68

unexplained share capital and share premium under Section 68 of the Act? B. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld. ITAT is correct in ignoring the fact that assessee has directly or indirectly received share capital and premium from entities/persons not having creditworthiness to provide such huge amount of unsecured loans? C. Whether the Ld. ITAT

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CUTTACK vs. SRINIVAS SAHOO

Appeal are allowed

ITA/65/2015HC Orissa04 Dec 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

Section 131Section 68Section 69

68 of the Act cannot be made applicable in the present case. 8.2 From reading of section 69 of the Act, it is evident that where in any financial year relevant to assessment year the assessee had made investments which are not recorded in the books of account and the assessee furnishes no explanation about the nature and source