BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Undisclosed Incomeclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi3,155Mumbai2,338Jaipur872Kolkata742Chennai692Bangalore552Ahmedabad466Hyderabad381Chandigarh301Indore286Pune264Surat247Cochin181Rajkot149Raipur142Nagpur131Visakhapatnam114Guwahati104Amritsar81Jodhpur68Cuttack63Lucknow62Agra58Allahabad57Calcutta55Patna51Ranchi40Dehradun25Karnataka25Telangana23Jabalpur15Varanasi11SC11Orissa3Punjab & Haryana2Gauhati2Panaji2Andhra Pradesh1Kerala1Rajasthan1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 685Section 2(22)(e)4Addition to Income3Section 692

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,BHUBANESWAR vs. KUNTALA MOHAPATRA

ITA/10/2024HC Orissa15 Apr 2024

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY

Section 132(4)Section 68

undisclosed sources, the findings as returned by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [‘ITAT’] and which has affirmed the view taken by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) would not sustain. Matter requires consideration. 3. Let the appeal be called again on 06.05.2024.” 3. The aforesaid issue arose in the context of the Tribunal while dealing with the additions under Section

M/S.BHASKAR TRADERS vs. ASST.COMMKNR.OF INCOME TAX,BERHAMPUR

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/174/2018HC Orissa30 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 132
Section 153A
Section 2(22)(e)
Section 68

Section 68, and, (b) the amounts secured as loan were treated as “deemed dividend” by the Assessing Officer (AO). Aggrieved, the assessee approached the CIT(A), who deleted the amounts brought to tax. Revenue unsuccessfully appealed the ITAT. The Revenue urges that the additions made on account of income from undisclosed

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CUTTACK vs. SRINIVAS SAHOO

Appeal are allowed

ITA/65/2015HC Orissa04 Dec 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

Section 131Section 68Section 69

68 of the Act cannot be made applicable in the present case. 8.2 From reading of section 69 of the Act, it is evident that where in any financial year relevant to assessment year the assessee had made investments which are not recorded in the books of account and the assessee furnishes no explanation about the nature and source