Search: section 68

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 153(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

NEELACHAL I.NIGAM L. vs. ASST.COMNR.OF I.TAX

ITA/8/2005HC Orissa17 Nov 2021

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

68. That, the AO has duty to act judicially and independently and its judgment cannot be controlled by the superior authority. The Supreme Court in Orient Paper Mills Ltd. v. Union of India27, held thus : 5. According to the learned Attorney-General the assessment proceedings are not of a quasi-judicial nature nor is the Assessing authority a quasi- judicial

BISWAJIT BEHERA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), BBSR

ITA/17/2024HC Orissa08 Oct 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

153 A /264 of the Act, the assessee wilfully chooses not to comply with the various notices issued by the Revenue despite the fact that numerous opportunities of being heard was provided to the assessee as per the principles of natural justice. IV. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT

NEELACHAL I.NIGAM L. vs. ASST.COMNR.OF I.TAX

BISWAJIT BEHERA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), BBSR

NEELACHAL I.NIGAM L. vs. ASST.COMNR.OF I.TAX

BISWAJIT BEHERA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), BBSR

COMNR.,OF INCOME TAX vs. FALCON REAL ESTATE

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. ORISSA MINING CORP.