BISWAJIT BEHERA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), BBSR

Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA,MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA

52 + ITA 17/2024 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 12:35:03 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL-2 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC with

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD.

In the result, this Income Tax Appeal is allowed, setting

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

52,76,459/- was adjusted against the taxable income of Rs.35,85,037/- for the assessment year 2011-12, whereby the taxable income came to be nil. The assessment authority disallowed the set off of loss and assessed the same as tax for the assessment year 2011-12. Thereafter, the assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Income

BARUNEI ROLLER FLOUR MILL (P) LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) 1

In the result, the award of the maximum uniform rate for the

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI (ACJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

52 daughter Smti. Shrar Kharthangmaw 35. Smti. Hinsila Rymshon :::Cross Objector/Respondent No.49/ Claimant No. 53 36. Smti. Cinobia Mary Shanpru :::Cross Objector/Respondent not D/o (L) Smti. Drimsimai Shanpru made party/Claimant No. 54 (Substituted vide Court’s order dated 22/11/2024 passed in MC (CRAPPL) No. 2 of 2024) 37. Smti. Thrida Rynjah :::Cross Objector/Respondent No.50/ Claimant No. 55 38. Shri. Onder

COMNR.,OF INCOME TAX vs. FALCON REAL ESTATE

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. ORISSA MINING CORP.

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires