BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 200clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai808Delhi801Karnataka491Bangalore297Jaipur197Hyderabad183Ahmedabad159Chennai147Kolkata110Chandigarh87Pune87Indore77Cochin60Raipur55Calcutta53Visakhapatnam46Lucknow45Telangana40Rajkot37Surat24Agra23Nagpur23Cuttack22SC15Amritsar14Rajasthan10Jodhpur8Guwahati8Patna5Varanasi5Panaji4Allahabad4Orissa3Ranchi2Dehradun2Kerala1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1

PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S.UTKAL ALUMINA INTERNATIONAL LTD.

ITA/10/2017HC Orissa04 Dec 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

200/-, which was paid entirely from his own earnings. The original perpetual lease deed dated 11.05.1971, has been exhibited as Ex. PW1/2, and the Conveyance Deed dated 05.01.2001, executed in favour of the Plaintiff, has been exhibited as Ex.PW1/3. The documents pertaining to house tax, assessment orders, and various notices issued in the Plaintiff‟s name have been exhibited

COMNR.,OF INCOME TAX vs. FALCON REAL ESTATE

ITA/5/2012HC Orissa10 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. ORISSA MINING CORP.

ITA/40/2007HC Orissa07 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 23(1)(A) of the LA Act from the date of award till the date of possession as there is a gap of 3 years from the date of award to possession of the acquired land. 18.6 Learned Senior Counsel/Learned Counsel for the Appellants submit that the acquired land’s potential, urban character, and intended acquisition purpose requires