PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

In the result, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

III Stage, Bengaluru-560 085. … Appellants (By Sri. Aravind K.V, Advocate) AND: M/s. Canara Bank, BSCA Section, FM & S Wing, HO, No.112, JC Road, Bengaluru-560 002. ... Respondent (By Sri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate) 2 This I.T.A is filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 30.03.2016 passed in ITA.No.813/Bang/2011

INDUSTRIAL INCUBATOR vs. DY.COMMNR.OF I.T.

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

1) of the IT Act, the books of accounts and other documents were produced. 5. In the assessment order dated 17th March, 1998 for the AY 1994-95 under Section 143(3) read with Section 148 of the IT Act, the AO inter alia held that the claim for 100% on aerators, marine water pumps and motors was not justified

M/S.G.K.W.LTD vs. COMNR.OF INCOMETAX

The appeal is disposed of in the

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

iii) of the Act in respect of the interest expenditure and public issue expenses incurred in respect of the funds which gave rise to interest income assessable under Section 56? (b) Whether the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the taxation of interest received amounting to Rs.1,02,02,714/- for the assessment year 1991-92? Page