BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 10(2)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai9,291Delhi7,491Bangalore2,797Chennai2,449Kolkata2,399Ahmedabad1,605Jaipur918Hyderabad859Pune845Chandigarh570Surat524Indore521Raipur435Cochin414Karnataka364Rajkot302Amritsar297Visakhapatnam240Nagpur218Cuttack203Lucknow171Agra119Jodhpur118Panaji111Telangana101Guwahati98SC88Allahabad82Ranchi69Calcutta67Patna66Dehradun53Varanasi33Kerala32Jabalpur25Punjab & Haryana21Rajasthan8Orissa4A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN4Himachal Pradesh2Gauhati2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 14A3Section 2602Section 45(2)2Section 142(1)2Section 143(3)2Section 1482Capital Gains2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 vs. M/S.JAGANNATH CHAUDHURY

The appeal is disposed of as indicated above

ITA/1/2018HC Orissa18 Dec 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

For Appellant: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXFor Respondent: M/S. SAHYADRI CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD

disallowed the deduction claimed under Section 80P of the Act. Further, the Assessing Officer concludes that the assessee earned income from interest on deposits from members and deposits made in scheduled Banks from trading commodities and interest from call money depositors. In view of the view taken by the Assessing Officer, the said income has been treated as income from

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Bench:
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

2) was issued on 20 October 2006. Thereafter notices under section 142 (1) was issued on several dates and the case was discussed with the authorised representative of the assessee. During the course of assessment proceedings several queries were raised by the assessing officer and in this appeal we are concerned about the issue as to whether the profit

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

In the result, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of

ITA/33/2017HC Orissa14 Nov 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 115Section 115JSection 14Section 14ASection 260Section 45(2)

III Stage, Bengaluru-560 085. … Appellants (By Sri. Aravind K.V, Advocate) AND: M/s. Canara Bank, BSCA Section, FM & S Wing, HO, No.112, JC Road, Bengaluru-560 002. ... Respondent (By Sri. T. Suryanarayana, Advocate) 2 This I.T.A is filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated 30.03.2016 passed in ITA.No.813/Bang/2011

INDUSTRIAL INCUBATOR vs. DY.COMMNR.OF I.T.

ITA/179/2004HC Orissa10 Nov 2021

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

III. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the approach road, drainage, bore-well, reservoir etc on which claim for depreciation made @ 25% holding as per schedule holding them as plant etc. can it be reduced to 10% by the Tribunal accepting as just and proper beyond the statute ?” 2. The appeal itself arises out of an order