BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 13(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,084Delhi836Chennai602Karnataka505Bangalore493Ahmedabad323Jaipur257Pune159Kolkata158Hyderabad155Cochin99Chandigarh94Indore86Surat84Lucknow69Rajkot51Cuttack50Visakhapatnam45Allahabad37Raipur32Amritsar29Nagpur29Agra25Jodhpur24Calcutta23Telangana22SC17Patna12Kerala10Varanasi8Guwahati6Jabalpur5Dehradun5Panaji5Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana4Ranchi4Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 260A2Section 32Section 11A2Section 42Section 173(1)2Charitable Trust2Exemption2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.E CITY PROJECTS LUCKNOW (P) LD.

The appeals are dismissed and substantial questions

ITA/85/2018HC Orissa05 Jul 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

For Appellant: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Senior Adv
Section 11ASection 12ASection 260ASection 3Section 4

13 of the Act. Further, it was pointed out that no action has been taken for cancelling the assessment order passed for the financial year 2006-07 and the time limit for invoking the power under Section 263 of the Act had also expired. The assessee further stated that it had objected to the said order on the ground that

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) vs. KIIT-TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS INCUBATOR(KIIT TBI)

The appeals are dismissed and substantial questions

ITA/87/2018HC Orissa11 Dec 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

For Appellant: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Senior Adv
Section 11ASection 12ASection 260ASection 3Section 4

13 of the Act. Further, it was pointed out that no action has been taken for cancelling the assessment order passed for the financial year 2006-07 and the time limit for invoking the power under Section 263 of the Act had also expired. The assessee further stated that it had objected to the said order on the ground that

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.DEWDROP MERCHANTS PVT.LTD.

ITA/133/2018HC Orissa13 Apr 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 166Section 173(1)

Section 166 of the Act on the ground that he was working as Chartered Accountant and was earning Rs.84,000/- p.m. It was pleaded that he also spent huge amount towards medical expenses, conveyance, etc. It was further pleaded that the accident occurred purely on account of the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver