BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 10clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,460Delhi1,295Chennai809Bangalore671Karnataka574Pune535Ahmedabad512Jaipur363Kolkata309Hyderabad228Chandigarh167Rajkot127Surat126Amritsar121Cochin119Indore114Lucknow98Visakhapatnam79Cuttack64Raipur54Allahabad50Agra50Nagpur48Jodhpur40Telangana34Patna32Calcutta29SC22Panaji14Varanasi14Ranchi13Dehradun12Jabalpur11Kerala10Guwahati10Rajasthan8Punjab & Haryana6Orissa5Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 114Charitable Trust4Exemption4Section 173(1)2Section 122Section 11(1)(a)2Section 260A2Section 32Section 11A

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.E CITY PROJECTS LUCKNOW (P) LD.

The appeals are dismissed and substantial questions

ITA/85/2018HC Orissa05 Jul 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

For Appellant: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Senior Adv
Section 11ASection 12ASection 260ASection 3Section 4

charitable purposes, would not make the slightest difference so far as entitlement of the donor trust for exemption under Section 11(1) of the Act. The Tribunal rightly took note of this decision while granting relief to the assessee. Hence, for the above reasons, we find no ground to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly, the appeals

2
Addition to Income2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) vs. KIIT-TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS INCUBATOR(KIIT TBI)

The appeals are dismissed and substantial questions

ITA/87/2018HC Orissa11 Dec 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

For Appellant: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Senior Adv
Section 11ASection 12ASection 260ASection 3Section 4

charitable purposes, would not make the slightest difference so far as entitlement of the donor trust for exemption under Section 11(1) of the Act. The Tribunal rightly took note of this decision while granting relief to the assessee. Hence, for the above reasons, we find no ground to interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly, the appeals

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, vs. SIKHYA\"O\"ANUSANDHAN

ITA/17/2015HC Orissa03 Jan 2023

Bench: The Itat Against The Respondent-Assessee For The Assessment Years (Ays) 2007-08 Till 2012-13.

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12

Section 11(1)(a) of the Act. Reference was also made to the decision of the Delhi High Court in St. Lawrenence Educational Society v. CIT (2010) 197 Taxman 504 (Del.) and the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Page 3 of 4 in Pinegrove International Charitable Trust v. Union of India

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. SIKHYA O ANUSANDHAN

ITA/34/2013HC Orissa03 Jan 2023

Bench: The Itat Against The Respondent-Assessee For The Assessment Years (Ays) 2007-08 Till 2012-13.

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 12

Section 11(1)(a) of the Act. Reference was also made to the decision of the Delhi High Court in St. Lawrenence Educational Society v. CIT (2010) 197 Taxman 504 (Del.) and the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Page 3 of 4 in Pinegrove International Charitable Trust v. Union of India

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.DEWDROP MERCHANTS PVT.LTD.

ITA/133/2018HC Orissa13 Apr 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 166Section 173(1)

Section 166 of the Act on the ground that he was working as Chartered Accountant and was earning Rs.84,000/- p.m. It was pleaded that he also spent huge amount towards medical expenses, conveyance, etc. It was further pleaded that the accident occurred purely on account of the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle by its driver