BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 40clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,968Delhi2,432Bangalore1,042Chennai899Kolkata568Ahmedabad475Jaipur399Hyderabad293Pune161Indore143Chandigarh138Cochin112Raipur98Rajkot78Nagpur76Surat74Visakhapatnam55SC50Lucknow46Panaji38Amritsar37Calcutta29Guwahati28Karnataka22Dehradun20Patna20Cuttack19Jodhpur14Jabalpur13Agra11Kerala11Ranchi10Varanasi8Allahabad7Rajasthan5Telangana5Orissa3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 260A3Disallowance2Set Off of Losses2

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

section 372A of the Companies Act, 1956. That the assessee has been investing funds with long- term view which is evident from the fact that during the financial year in question the assessee has yearned Rs. 460.09 lakhs as capital gains from the investment activities out of which Rs. 432.09 lakhs was long-term capital gain. That during the whole

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXEXEMPTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. SIKSHYA O ANUSANDHAN

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA/37/2018HC Orissa03 Jan 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : February 15, 2022. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Mr. Debasish Chowdhury, Adv. … For The Appellant Mr. R.K. Murarka, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sutapa Roy Choudhury, Adv. Ms. Aratrika Roy, Adv. … For The Respondent The Court : This Appeal By The Revenue Filed Under Section 260A Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Is Directed Against The Order Dated 3Rd May, 2017 Passed By The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata (Tribunal) In

Section 14ASection 260ASection 73

Capital Gain of Rs.1,48,40,879/- instead of normal business income without considering the fact that frequency of transaction, non-maintenance of separate demat account of investment and for trading suggests that sale of shares are normal business income in nature? c) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

ACIT, CIRCLE 1(2) vs. M/S. SERAJUDDIN AND CO.

ITA/44/2022HC Orissa15 Mar 2023

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak Date : 26Th July, 2022 Appearance :- Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. … For Appellant Mr. S.M. Surana, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv. Md. Afzal Ansari, Adv. … For Respondent

Section 11Section 11(1)(a)Section 260A

40,000/- towards capital gain from sale of cars. The Learned Income Tax Appellant Tribunal has considered that capital gain from sale of cars would qualify for exemption under section