BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “TDS”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,855Delhi6,786Bangalore3,180Chennai2,865Kolkata2,124Pune1,347Ahmedabad792Patna790Hyderabad786Karnataka743Cochin640Jaipur532Indore439Raipur425Chandigarh389Nagpur321Visakhapatnam223Lucknow199Cuttack181Rajkot171Surat169Jodhpur128Telangana98Ranchi93Panaji88Dehradun87Amritsar87Agra81Guwahati66Jabalpur48Kerala41Calcutta31SC29Allahabad20Varanasi12Rajasthan10Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7Orissa5J&K5Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Bombay1Andhra Pradesh1Gauhati1KURIAN JOSEPH ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 201(1)4Section 271C4TDS4Section 2013Section 1923Addition to Income3Section 260A2Section 194C2Section 9(1)(vii)

M.D.,BHARAT MOTORS vs. A.C.OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/132/2006HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273B

TDS) in terms of Section 201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘IT Act’). The AO had levied

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

2
Deduction2
Penalty2
Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 260ASection 9Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS)-II, Chandigarh ....Appellant. Versus M/s Shandong Tiejun Electric Power Engineering Co. Ltd., Jhajjar ...Respondent. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE

SUNIL KU.SAHU vs. CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is disposed of in the above terms

ITA/83/2017HC Orissa10 Mar 2022

Bench: The Learned Tribunal, Are As Under:- A) That The Learned Tribunal Has Erred In Adopting The Multiplier Dependent On The Age Of The Mother Of The Deceased, Rather Than On The Age Of The Deceased. The Learned Counsel For The Appellants Submits That The Multiplier Has To Be Based On The Age Of The Deceased. He Submits That, In The Present Case, The Deceased Was Aged Digitally Signed By:Sunil Signing Date:04.09.2023 18:34:06 Signature Not Verified

TDS certificate) of the deceased, to submit that the said certificate shows the income of the deceased as Rs.9

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NIDAN

The Appeal is allowed

ITA/160/2018HC Orissa13 Jul 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

For Appellant: Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sri A Rama Krishna Reddy representing
Section 151Section 260

TDS circle-'1 5(2), Hyderabad. Between: It//s.Tata teleservices Limited, 5th Floor, KLK Estate, Fateh Maidan Road, Hydrabad

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

TDS is to be made on the 'rent'. The expression 'rent' is given much wider meaning under this provision