DY. CIT- WARDHA CIRCLE,, WARDHA vs. JAMNALAL SONS PVT. LTD.,, WARDHA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 34/Nag/2015 ननिाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Wardha Circle, Wardha. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

2. These cases were heard together. Since issues common and facts are similar, these cases are being disposed of vide this consolidated order. A.Ys. 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 3. At the time of hearing, one adjournment petition has been filed in all these appeals and the same was rejected and cases were heard on merits after recording

ACIT WARDHA CIRCLE,, WARDHA vs. JAMNALAL SONS PVT LID., WARDHA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 34/Nag/2015 ननिाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Wardha Circle, Wardha. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

2. These cases were heard together. Since issues common and facts are similar, these cases are being disposed of vide this consolidated order. A.Ys. 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 3. At the time of hearing, one adjournment petition has been filed in all these appeals and the same was rejected and cases were heard on merits after recording

ACIT WARDHA CIRCLE,, WARDHA vs. JAMNALAL SONS PVT LID., WARDHA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 34/Nag/2015 ननिाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Wardha Circle, Wardha. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

2. These cases were heard together. Since issues common and facts are similar, these cases are being disposed of vide this consolidated order. A.Ys. 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 3. At the time of hearing, one adjournment petition has been filed in all these appeals and the same was rejected and cases were heard on merits after recording

ACIT WARDHA CIRCLE,, WARDHA vs. JAMNALAL SONS PVT LID., WARDHA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury, Jm आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 34/Nag/2015 ननिाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Wardha Circle, Wardha. .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बनाम / V/S.

2. These cases were heard together. Since issues common and facts are similar, these cases are being disposed of vide this consolidated order. A.Ys. 2009-10, 2010-11 & 2011-12 3. At the time of hearing, one adjournment petition has been filed in all these appeals and the same was rejected and cases were heard on merits after recording

BAJAJ EXPORTS PVT. LTD.,NAGPUR vs. THE DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, 2(3), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

2) That the learned Assessing Officer erred in law and on facts in disallowing interest expenditure of Rs.17,91,935/– and out of other expenditure Rs.77,146/– (total Rs.18,69,081/–) holding that the assessee has incurred expenditure to this extent for earning exempted (dividend). On the facts and circumstances of the case the disallowance made by invoking Section 14A