M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals for the assessment year 2009–10 to 2013–14 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

reassess the total income of 6 years immediately preceding the AY relevant to the PY in which the search is conducted. The second limb enables the AO to go up to 10 AYs. The stand of the respondent is that the search AY should not be included while computing the 10 AYs u/s153 A. Otherwise, AY13-14 will come under

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals for the assessment year 2009–10 to 2013–14 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

reassess the total income of 6 years immediately preceding the AY relevant to the PY in which the search is conducted. The second limb enables the AO to go up to 10 AYs. The stand of the respondent is that the search AY should not be included while computing the 10 AYs u/s153 A. Otherwise, AY13-14 will come under

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION& INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeals for the assessment year 2009–10 to 2013–14 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant Mmber

reassess the total income of 6 years immediately preceding the AY relevant to the PY in which the search is conducted. The second limb enables the AO to go up to 10 AYs. The stand of the respondent is that the search AY should not be included while computing the 10 AYs u/s153 A. Otherwise, AY13-14 will come under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S. RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

10. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in limiting the scope of section 153A only to undisclosed income when as per the section, the AO has to assess or re-assess the total income of the six assessment years? 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S. RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER , NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

10. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in limiting the scope of section 153A only to undisclosed income when as per the section, the AO has to assess or re-assess the total income of the six assessment years? 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

10. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in limiting the scope of section 153A only to undisclosed income when as per the section, the AO has to assess or re-assess the total income of the six assessment years? 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S. RADHA RADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

10. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in limiting the scope of section 153A only to undisclosed income when as per the section, the AO has to assess or re-assess the total income of the six assessment years? 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. M/S. RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

10. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in limiting the scope of section 153A only to undisclosed income when as per the section, the AO has to assess or re-assess the total income of the six assessment years? 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

10. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in limiting the scope of section 153A only to undisclosed income when as per the section, the AO has to assess or re-assess the total income of the six assessment years? 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case

A,C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.- 2(2), NAGPUR vs. SHRI DHARAMPAL R.AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal being ITA no

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

29,550/-. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of bad debts and EMD lapsed amounting to Rs. 3,27,930/-. 12. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 4. Facts in Brief:– During the year, the assessee

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL FINANCE INDIA P. LTD.,, NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

29,550/-. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of bad debts and EMD lapsed amounting to Rs. 3,27,930/-. 12. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 4. Facts in Brief:– During the year, the assessee

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL COAL INDIA PVT. LTD.,, NAGPUR

In the result, Revenue’s appeal being ITA no

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

29,550/-. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of bad debts and EMD lapsed amounting to Rs. 3,27,930/-. 12. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 4. Facts in Brief:– During the year, the assessee

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

section 10(38) of the Act. 4. (2015) 281 CTR 241 (SC) Andaman Timber Industries –Vs- Commissioner Of Central Excise Not allowing assessee to cross-examine witnesses by adjudicating authority though statements of those witnesses were made as basis of impugned order, amounted in serious flaw which make impugned order nullity as it amounted to violation of principles of natural

A,C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.- 2(2), NAGPUR vs. SHRI DHARAMPAL R.AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

29,550/-. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of bad debts and EMD lapsed amounting to Rs. 3,27,930/-. 12. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of hearing." 4. Facts in Brief:– During the year, the assessee

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL FINANCE INDIA P. LTD.,, NAGPUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

29,550/-. 11. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition made on account of disallowance of bad debts and EMD lapsed amounting to Rs. 3,27,930/-. 12. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of hearing." 4. Facts in Brief:– During the year, the assessee

DP JAIN DATIA BHANDER TOLL ROAD PROJECTS PVT LTD,NAGPUR vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

reassessment that stood abated shall stand revived. 10. Thus on a plain reading of Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, it becomes clear that on initiation of proceedings under Section 153A, it is only the assessment/reassessment proceedings that are pending on the date of conducting search under Section 132 or making requisition under Section 132A of the Act stand

DP JAIN DARIAPUR JASONDHI (ANNUITY) ROAD PROJECT PVT. LTD.,NAPGUR vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

reassessment that stood abated shall stand revived. 10. Thus on a plain reading of Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, it becomes clear that on initiation of proceedings under Section 153A, it is only the assessment/reassessment proceedings that are pending on the date of conducting search under Section 132 or making requisition under Section 132A of the Act stand

M/S D.P.JAIN UJJAIN PACKAGE (ANNUITY ROAD PROJECTS) PVT .LTD,NAGPUR vs. THE PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL) , NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

reassessment that stood abated shall stand revived. 10. Thus on a plain reading of Section 153A of the Income-tax Act, it becomes clear that on initiation of proceedings under Section 153A, it is only the assessment/reassessment proceedings that are pending on the date of conducting search under Section 132 or making requisition under Section 132A of the Act stand