BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 254(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai192Surat139Delhi91Chennai64Ahmedabad64Jaipur60Kolkata44Rajkot34Raipur32Pune29Indore25Bangalore25Hyderabad21Visakhapatnam21Lucknow20Chandigarh18Cochin12Nagpur11Guwahati9Cuttack8Allahabad5SC5Varanasi5Agra3Patna3Panaji2Dehradun2Amritsar2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A12Section 1489Section 254(1)8Section 69A8Section 2637Condonation of Delay6Section 80G(5)5Addition to Income5Section 156A4

UNIVERSAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND TECHNICAL SERVICES PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2 , NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 349/NAG/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur17 Feb 2026AY 2014-15
Section 156ASection 254(1)Section 31(1)

section 254(1) of Income Tax Act\nPER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:\n1. These two appeals by assessee are directed against the separate orders of Id.\nCIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, both dated 27.04.2023 for\n Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2014–15 & 2015–16. In both the appeals the assessee has\nraised similar grounds of appeal, raising the plea

UNIVERSAL INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT AND TECHNICAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2 , NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 350/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: Disposed
Section 234A4
Exemption4
Limitation/Time-bar4
ITAT Nagpur
17 Feb 2026
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 156ASection 254(1)Section 31(1)

section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These two appeals by assessee are directed against the separate orders of ld. CIT(A)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi, both dated 27.04.2023 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2014–15 & 2015–16. In both the appeals the assessee has raised similar grounds of appeal, raising the plea that

YOUNG ENGINEERS EDUCATION SOCIETY,KURKHEDA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE

In the result, both the appeals of assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 404/NAG/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

Section 12ASection 12A(1)Section 12A(1)(ac)Section 254(1)Section 80G(5)

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. These two appeals by assessee are directed against the separate orders of ld. CIT(E) both dated 26.07.2024. In ITA No. 404/Nag/2025, the assessee has filed appeal against rejection of application under section 12AB. In ITA No. 279/Pun/2025, the assessee has challenged the rejection of application under section

FATTESING PUNAJI DHABRE,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX – 2, NAGPUR

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 368/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy(Physical Hearing) Fattesing Punaji Dhabre Pcit – 2, Nagpur Plot No. 132, Chandan Nagar, Post Vs Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Hanuman Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra – 440001. Maharashtra – 440009. [Pan: Bacpd6505Q] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Madhav Vichare, Ca Revenue By Shri Pankaj Kumar, Cit–Dr Date Of Hearing 17.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 24.02.2026 Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income Tax Act

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 254(1)Section 263Section 54B

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (in short, the “ld. PCIT") – 2, Nagpur dated 30/03/2021 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal: “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances

BHAWANA HARIRAM LAVHALE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, AMRAVATI

In the result, assessee’s appeal for the assessment year 2013–14 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 170/NAG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri K.P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 44Section 69A

1)(c) of the Act separately. The assessee being aggrieved by the order so passed by the Assessing Officer, carried the matter before the first appellate authority. 6. Before the learned CIT(A), the assessee filed application for condonation of delay along with affidavit of Advocate Smt. Shruti Joshi, for delay of about 35 days to be condoned. The assessee

BHAWANA HARIRAM LAVHALE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3, AMRAVATI

In the result, assessee’s appeal for the assessment year 2013–14 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 169/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri K.P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 44Section 69A

1)(c) of the Act separately. The assessee being aggrieved by the order so passed by the Assessing Officer, carried the matter before the first appellate authority. 6. Before the learned CIT(A), the assessee filed application for condonation of delay along with affidavit of Advocate Smt. Shruti Joshi, for delay of about 35 days to be condoned. The assessee

PETANITY AND ANIMAL REHABILITATORS FOUNDATION,CHANDRAPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 165/NAG/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Feb 2026

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy(Physical Hearing) Petanity & Animal Rehabilitators Cit(Exemption), Pune Foundation Chandrapur Vs Room No. 322, 3Rd Floor, Ito, Pmt Sagar Enterprises, Madhuban Plaza, Building, Shankar Seth Road, Near Mount Convent, Shivaji Nagar, Pune – 411037. Chandrapur, Maharashtra – 442401. [Pan: Aagap6876N] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Bhavesh Moriyani, Advocate Revenue By Shri Pankaj Kumar, Cit–Dr Date Of Hearing 23.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 23.02.2026 Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income Tax Act

Section 12ASection 254(1)

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of learned CIT(Exemption), Pune dated 18.10.2024 in rejecting application for registration of trust under section 12AA/12AB of the Income Tax Act (Act). The ld. CIT(E) rejected the application in ex-parte proceeding and also cancelled provisional registration

ELGAR PRATISTHAN,CHANDRAPUR vs. ITO WARD-3 EXEMPTION, NAGPUR

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are

ITA 263/NAG/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2026

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy(Physical Hearing) Elgar Pratisthan Ito, Ward–3 (Exemption), Nagpur Pragati Nagar, Rayatwari Ward, Vs Bsnl Rttc Building, Nagpur, Tadala Road, Chandrapur, Maharashtra – 440006. Maharashtra–442402. [Pan: Aaate2218A] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

Section 12ASection 254(1)Section 80GSection 80G(5)

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order ld. CIT(Exemption), Pune dated 05.08.2024. The assessee has filed present appeal against the rejection of application for registration under section 80G of the Act. 2. Rival submissions of both the parties have been heard and record perused

ALFIYA AYAZALI SAYYAD,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 206/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Jun 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha
Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay is hereby condoned. Accordingly, we now proceed to dispose off the appeal filed by the assessee on merit. 5. Insofar as the merit of the case is concerned, the brief facts of the case are that, the assessee has made purchases from M/s. Meridian Trading Company amounting to ` 72,34,240, and from M/s. Glob Impex (India) amounting

PARIKSHIT RAMESH FUKE,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(2) NAGPUR , NAGPUR

In the result grounds of appeal raised by assessee is allowed for

ITA 393/NAG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy(Physical Hearing) Parikshit Ramesh Fuke, Ito, Ward-1(2), 11, Fuke Patil Marg, Ambazari Road, Vs Bsnl Rttc Building, Balaji Mandir Nagpur Urban, Road, Seminary Hills, Nagpur, Maharashtra – 440033. Nagpur, Mharashtra. [Pan: Aabpf6490J] Pin:440033. Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

Section 144Section 254(1)

section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated 22.04.2025 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2018-19. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal; “1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned Commissioner of Income

SHIVPRASAD SHEVADE,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 4(4), BSNL RTTC BUILDING, NAGPUR

In the result, grounds of appeal raised by assessee are allowed

ITA 370/NAG/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy(Physical Hearing) Shivprasad Shevade, Ito, Ward-4(4), Plot No. 80, Attadeep Nagar, Vs Bsnl Rttc Building, Seminary Near Juni Vasti Manewada, Nagpur, Hills, Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharashtra – 440027. Mharashtra–440033. [Pan: Eqops0368M] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue

Section 144Section 147Section 254(1)

254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: 1. This appeal by assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT(A)/NFAC, Delhi dated –01.11.2024 for Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2015-16. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal; “1. That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Learned