BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 245clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai128Karnataka104Chennai101Kolkata81Delhi58Bangalore37Jaipur26Pune25Chandigarh11Hyderabad11Cuttack11Ahmedabad9Ranchi8Indore8Lucknow7SC6Varanasi5Surat5Guwahati4Visakhapatnam3Amritsar3Nagpur3Panaji2Cochin2Dehradun1Raipur1Rajasthan1Agra1Calcutta1Andhra Pradesh1Telangana1Allahabad1Patna1

Key Topics

Addition to Income2Condonation of Delay2

PURUSHOTTAM NARAYANRAO JADHAO,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 3(4), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 155/NAG/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha

245 days may kindly be condoned in order to render the justice.” 3. We find sufficient and reasonable cause to condone the delay of 246 days in filing the present appeal by the assessee before us. 4. While going through the material available before us, it appears from the impugned order passed by the learned CIT(A) that there

M/S SHRIGOPAL RAMESHKUMAR SALES PVT. LTD ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMISSIONER CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 53/NAG/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur
30 Dec 2024
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

condone the delay of 702 days in filing of the appeal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits. 5. The sole dispute involved in this appeal relates to addition sustained by the learned CIT(A) amounting to ` 2,50,00,000, allegedly held to have been received by the assessee in cash. 6. The assessee is engaged

PURUSHOTTAM NARAYANRAO JADHAO,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD 3(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 103/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jun 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai
Section 148Section 250Section 44A

section 44AD, which is excessive and does not correspond to the actual business income reflected as per audited books of accounts. 5. Whether on the facts and in law, the learned AO erred in making-an addition of Rs.I3,04,245 by erroneously treating the same as professional receipts whereas, the same were part of contractual receipts and only