BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

100 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Nagpur100Chandigarh80Chennai21Mumbai18Hyderabad16Jaipur14Delhi12Pune12Bangalore9Cochin7Raipur6Ahmedabad5Kolkata5Rajkot5Visakhapatnam4Panaji3Lucknow3Jodhpur2Surat2Indore1

Key Topics

Section 194A216Section 201(1)183Section 201103Section 250100TDS100Deduction94Condonation of Delay89Limitation/Time-bar80Exemption75

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 277/NAG/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryassessment Year : 2012-13 Bank Of India, Dcit (Tds), Hingna Branch, Nagpur Zonal Office, Vs. Circle-1, 3Rd Floor, Csd Dept., Kingsways, Nagpur Nagpur – 440 001, Maharashtra Pan : Aaacb0472C Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 201(3)(i)Section 250

194A on interest paid/credited to its customers along with interest thereon and also non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section

Showing 1–20 of 100 · Page 1 of 5

Section 197A32
Section 19126
Section 271C24

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 363/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 360/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 365/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 361/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 389/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 386/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 362/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 364/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 366/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 387/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 391/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 359/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRICLE-51(10, NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 388/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 392/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeal before him. 4 I.T.A.Nos.359 to 366, 386 to 389, 391 & 392/NAG./2022 3. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the assessee is a Nationalised Bank engaged in the banking business. Section 194A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 269/NAG/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

194A on interest paid/credited to its customers and also non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeals before him. 4. First of all, we are espousing the issue of non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A). The facts for ITA No.337/Nag/2022 are that the order u/s.201(1)/201

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 271/NAG/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

194A on interest paid/credited to its customers and also non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeals before him. 4. First of all, we are espousing the issue of non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A). The facts for ITA No.337/Nag/2022 are that the order u/s.201(1)/201

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 272/NAG/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

194A on interest paid/credited to its customers and also non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeals before him. 4. First of all, we are espousing the issue of non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A). The facts for ITA No.337/Nag/2022 are that the order u/s.201(1)/201

BANK OF INDIA ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 270/NAG/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

194A on interest paid/credited to its customers and also non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeals before him. 4. First of all, we are espousing the issue of non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A). The facts for ITA No.337/Nag/2022 are that the order u/s.201(1)/201

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONE OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are allowed

ITA 337/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Aug 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhurysl.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 250

194A on interest paid/credited to its customers and also non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A) in presenting the appeals before him. 4. First of all, we are espousing the issue of non-condonation of delay by the ld. CIT(A). The facts for ITA No.337/Nag/2022 are that the order u/s.201(1)/201