Search: condonation of delay

94 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 10(20)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 194A96 Section 25090 Section 153C85 Condonation of Delay70 TDS66 Deduction53 Exemption52 Section 20148 Section 201(1)48

SATPUDA FOUNDATION,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 143/NAG/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur03 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. Moryani a/wFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234A

section 119(2)(b) of the Act, the CBDT has decided that where the application for condonation of delay in filling Form 9A and Form 10 has been filed, and the Return of Income has been filed on or before 31 S1 March of the respective assessment years i.e. Assessment Years 20

Showing 1–20 of 94 · Page 1 of 5

SATPUDA FOUNDATION,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NAGPUR

SATPUDA FOUNDATION,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, NAGPUR

SUNILKUMAR RAJENDRA RAI,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(4), NAGPUR

CHINMAYA SEVA TRUST,NAGPUR,NAGPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), CIT (E), INCOME TAX OFFICE, PMT BUILDING, SHANKAR SETH ROAD, PUNE

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION& INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION& INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION & INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

M/S MAHESHWARI COAL BENEFICATION& INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD,BILASPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

STELLAR REFRACTORIES PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

TAJSHREE AUTOWHEELS PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX. TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CPC, GHAZIABAD

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,GHAZIABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONE OF INCOMDE EF, GAZIABADQQQ.

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST ,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD

ESTATE OFFICER, PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FOREST,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS-CPC, GHAZIABAD