BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

160 results for “condonation of delay”+ Natural Justiceclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai1,726Mumbai1,500Delhi1,183Kolkata789Ahmedabad742Bangalore714Pune631Jaipur493Hyderabad458Chandigarh317Patna296Raipur272Indore266Surat231Lucknow201Visakhapatnam190Amritsar186Rajkot174Agra160Nagpur160Panaji151Cuttack141Cochin92Calcutta55Jodhpur54Guwahati49Dehradun38Jabalpur34Ranchi28Allahabad26SC24Karnataka15Telangana7Varanasi6Rajasthan6Kerala5Orissa4Himachal Pradesh4Andhra Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana1DIPAK MISRA R.K. AGRAWAL PRAFULLA C. PANT1Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 153C85Natural Justice60Addition to Income53Condonation of Delay53Section 25050Section 12A41Section 26330Section 153A29Section 143(3)

ASTAVINAYAK GRAMIN BIGAR SHETI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT,JANEPHAL vs. ITO WARD-1, KHAMGAON

In the result, as delay in filing of appeal is not condoned, the appeal is not admitted and is rejected accordingly

ITA 158/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Nilesh ToshniwalFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha
Section 147Section 148Section 2(31)Section 249Section 249(2)

natural justice must be observed, they cannot be stretched to accommodate inordinate delays caused by negligence or mismanagement. d. The delay of 15 months is significant and beyond a reasonable timeframe for filing an appeal. Such a prolonged delay indicates a lack of vigilance and allowing condonation

Showing 1–20 of 160 · Page 1 of 8

...
27
Section 6822
Section 14721
Exemption21

GURPALSINGH CHANANSINGH NAGRA,AKOLA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC, BANGLORE

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 206/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur06 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy

For Appellant: Shri S.G. GandhiFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(1)

condone the delay in filing the present appeal and proceed to dispose off the appeal on merits. However, a cost of ` 5,000, is levied upon the assessee for the delay in filing the petition, which should be paid to the account of The Nagpur High Court Legal Service Committee. In all fairness, the learned Counsel for the assessee agreed

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. ITO WD 3, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 128/NAG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Vikash Agrawal
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 271(1)(c)

justice. Moreover, there will be heavy loss in the developmental projects undertaken by the trust, mainly for the upliftment of poor and tribals. There will be loss of Public funds received for the above purpose.” The learned Counsel thus prayed that the entire matter be restored to the file of the learned CIT(A) with direction to condone the delay

NAGESHWARA CHARITABLE TRUST,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, EXEMPTION, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 129/NAG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Vikash Agrawal
Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 271(1)(c)

justice. Moreover, there will be heavy loss in the developmental projects undertaken by the trust, mainly for the upliftment of poor and tribals. There will be loss of Public funds received for the above purpose.” The learned Counsel thus prayed that the entire matter be restored to the file of the learned CIT(A) with direction to condone the delay

DNYANESHWAR BAPURAO CHUNADE,BHADRAWATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 624/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Jun 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Ld. Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 147Section 250

natural justice, we are inclined to set aside the impugned order and consequently remanding the instant case to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh on the application for condonation of delay

PANHERA GRAMIN BIGARSHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,BULDHANA vs. ITO WARD-2, KHAMGAON, KHAMGAON

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes only

ITA 520/NAG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur05 Mar 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Smt. Veena AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 250Section 80P(2)(a)

condoning the delay in filing appeal. 4. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case the Ld. CIT(A) is justified in passing an order in breach of principle of natural justice

LOKSEWA SHIKSHAN BAHUUDDESHIYA MANDAL,BULDHANA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 62/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.62/Nag/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2015-16 Lokeswa Shikshan The Commissioner Of Bahuuddeshiya Mandal, V Income Tax-I, Nagpur. C/O. Dr.Arvindw.Kolte, S Janta College, Buldhana Road, Malkapur – 443101. Pan: Aaatl5306N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/Revenue Assessee By Shri Sanjay Thakar – Ar Revenue By Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya – Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 28/03/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 22/04/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Nagpur Dated 11.11.2014 Passed Under Section 12Aa(1) Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal : 1] On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & Material Already On Record The Learned Cit Should Have Granted Registration U/S. 12A As Per Assessee’S Application Filed On Lokeswa Shikshan Bahuuddeshiya Mandal [A]

Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 148Section 253(3)

condonation application that there is a delay in filing of appeal before ITAT of eight years, eighty-eight days. 2.2 The appellant has given following reasoning in the Affidavit for delay : “However for A.Y.2015-16 the return had remained to be filed and hence the (case of the Assessee was reopened for A.Y.2015-16 by notice u/s.148 dt.30.03.2022. It was in this

ANAND GOVIND THATTE,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 127/NAG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)Section 56(2)(vii)

delay is not condoned and the appeal is not admitted, I will suffer substantially and irreparable loss will be caused. 10. In light of the above facts and in the interest of natural justice

SANGEET ASHOKRAO CHAVAN,NAGPUR vs. ACIT/DCIT CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed, but only for statistical purposes

ITA 510/NAG/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil HiraniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

delay is not condoned and the appeal is not admitted, I will suffer substantially and irreparable loss will be caused. 9. In light of the above facts and in the interest of natural justice

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 315/NAG/2024[2015-16]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur12 Dec 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 250

condoned in the Interest of Justice and kindly admit the appeal for the sake of principal of the natural justice. PRAYED ACCORDINGLY” 3. After considering the averments made in the application, we are of the opinion that the assessee is prevented in filing the appeal belatedly and we 4 Shri Pankaj Nandlal Agrawal are satisfied that the delay

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. DCIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 317/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur12 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 250

condoned in the Interest of Justice and kindly admit the appeal for the sake of principal of the natural justice. PRAYED ACCORDINGLY” 3. After considering the averments made in the application, we are of the opinion that the assessee is prevented in filing the appeal belatedly and we 4 Shri Pankaj Nandlal Agrawal are satisfied that the delay

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 316/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur12 Dec 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 250

condoned in the Interest of Justice and kindly admit the appeal for the sake of principal of the natural justice. PRAYED ACCORDINGLY” 3. After considering the averments made in the application, we are of the opinion that the assessee is prevented in filing the appeal belatedly and we 4 Shri Pankaj Nandlal Agrawal are satisfied that the delay

SHRI PANKAJ NANDLAL AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 318/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur12 Dec 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 250

condoned in the Interest of Justice and kindly admit the appeal for the sake of principal of the natural justice. PRAYED ACCORDINGLY” 3. After considering the averments made in the application, we are of the opinion that the assessee is prevented in filing the appeal belatedly and we 4 Shri Pankaj Nandlal Agrawal are satisfied that the delay

PRAKASH SHESHRAO WANKHEDE,KORADI KAMPTEE, NAGPUR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 461/NAG/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur10 Oct 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadaleprakash Sheshrao Wankhede, Khaprikoradi, Ward No.6 Near Hanuman Mandir Tehsil Kamptee, Koradi (Nv) ……………. Appellant Nagpur -441 111, Maharashtra. Pan–Abypw7048B V/S Income Tax Officer ……………. Respondent Ward–3(4), Nagpur Assessee By: None Revenue By : Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr.Dr

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr.DR
Section 54F

natural justice.” 2. There is a delay of 296 days in filing the appeal before the Hon’ble Tribunal and the assessee has filed an application and affidavit for 3 Prakash Sheshrao Wankhede ITA no.461/NAG./2025 condonation

ABDUL IRFAN ABDUL AJIJ SHEIKH,WARDHA vs. ITO, WARD-2, WARDHA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 78/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Ms. Shrishti PandeFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 69A

condone the delay in filing the appeal before us and in view of the principles of natural justice and in accordance

SANT TUKDOJI NAGRI SHAHKARI PAT SANSTHA LIMITED, HINGANGHAT,HINGANGHAT vs. ITO WARD - 2, WARDHA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 356/NAG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur20 Dec 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 144Section 234ASection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(4)

condone the delay of 209 days in filing the present appeal and admit the same for adjudication on merit. 5. Now, before coming to the merits of the case, during the course of hearing, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the learned CIT(A) has dismissed the assessee’s appeal on the ground that there is delay

VINAY RAMSHARANDAS AGRAWAL,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 110/NAG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 143(3)Section 263

justice.” 4. In support of the averments made in the application for condonation, the learned Counsel for the assessee relied on the following case laws:– “i) Anil Kumar Nehru and Anr v/s ACIT, [2019] 98 CCH 469 (Bom.); and ii) Anil Kumar Nehru through his Power of Attorney Anki tAgrawal v/s ACIT, [2019] 260 Taxman 372 (SC). 5. After considering

PANHERA GRAMIN BIGARSHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,BULDHANA vs. ITO WARD-2, KHAMGAON, KHAMGAON

In the result, assessee’s appeal being ITA no

ITA 495/NAG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Smt. Veena AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 142(1)

condoning the delay in filing appeal. 4. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) is justified in confirming the order passed by the learned AO in breach of principle of natural justice

PANHERA GRAMIN BIGARSHETI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,BULDHANA vs. ITO WARD-2, KHAMGAON, KHAMGAON

In the result, assessee’s appeal being ITA no

ITA 496/NAG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Smt. Veena AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 142(1)

condoning the delay in filing appeal. 4. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned CIT(A) is justified in confirming the order passed by the learned AO in breach of principle of natural justice

BHAWANA HARIRAM LAVHALE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, AMRAVATI

In the result, assessee’s appeal for the assessment year 2013–14 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 170/NAG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri K.P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 44Section 69A

natural justice and is required to be set aside. 4. The learned CIT(A) ought to have condoned the nominal delay