BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

155 results for “TDS”+ Section 201(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,553Delhi1,528Bangalore1,096Chennai644Kolkata462Indore368Pune285Ahmedabad283Karnataka257Jaipur225Cochin203Raipur177Hyderabad175Nagpur155Chandigarh127Cuttack88Surat63Visakhapatnam63Lucknow59Rajkot57Jodhpur56Jabalpur50Ranchi40Panaji36Telangana27Amritsar25Agra24Dehradun24Allahabad18Patna17SC13Guwahati10Kerala9Varanasi8Himachal Pradesh6Orissa3Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)186Section 194A164TDS98Deduction87Section 25084Section 20184Condonation of Delay71Limitation/Time-bar60Exemption56Section 271C

BANK OF INDIA,MAHAL BRANCH NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS)CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 160/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

201(1)/(1A) for non-deduction of TDS on receipt of Form 15G/15H. Considering the above decisions, the appellant Bank requests the Tribunal to condone the delay in filing of appeal before Hon'ble CIT(A) and consider this appeal and prays that the proceedings under section

BANK OF INDIA, DONGARGAON NAGPUR vs. DY.CIT(TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals are partly allowed in light of aforesaid directions

ITA 153/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

201(1)/(1A) for non-deduction of TDS on receipt of Form 15G/15H. Considering the above decisions, the appellant Bank requests the Tribunal to condone the delay in filing of appeal before Hon'ble CIT(A) and consider this appeal and prays that the proceedings under section

Showing 1–20 of 155 · Page 1 of 8

...
26
Section 194C18
Section 194C(6)18

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 362/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 363/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRICLE-51(10, NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 388/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 387/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 392/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 365/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 364/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 389/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 359/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 366/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 391/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 386/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 360/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 361/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 277/NAG/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryassessment Year : 2012-13 Bank Of India, Dcit (Tds), Hingna Branch, Nagpur Zonal Office, Vs. Circle-1, 3Rd Floor, Csd Dept., Kingsways, Nagpur Nagpur – 440 001, Maharashtra Pan : Aaacb0472C Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 201(3)(i)Section 250

section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted four cases, as tabulated on page 4 of his order, where interest paid was more than

I.T.O.(T.D.S.) WARD 2(3), CHANDRAPUR vs. ULTRATECH CEMENT LTD UNIT AWARPUR CEMENT WORKS,

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 345/NAG/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi

Section 194CSection 194C(6)Section 201

TDS under section 194C of the Act and was, therefore, directed to pay the tax amounting to ` 61,78,095, ` 57,84,468, ` 69,27,997, ` 2,43,03,965 and ` 34,30,645 under section 201(1

INDOWORTH INDIA LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), CIRCLE 51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 4/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri R.K. GaneriwalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

section 201(3) the Financial Act, 2012. 3. The non–deduction TDS and interest thereon u/s 201(1) and 201

M/S INDOWORTH INDIA LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), CIRCLE 51(1) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 3/NAG/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri R.K. GaneriwalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

section 201(3) the Financial Act, 2012. 3. The non–deduction TDS and interest thereon u/s 201(1) and 201