BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

131 results for “TDS”+ Section 201(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,342Mumbai1,205Bangalore1,048Chennai542Kolkata315Pune160Raipur138Nagpur131Jaipur126Ahmedabad120Hyderabad103Indore92Cochin64Karnataka62Chandigarh60Jodhpur45Lucknow43Rajkot37Panaji26Visakhapatnam22Surat22Cuttack18Agra18Patna17SC13Jabalpur10Kerala9Guwahati9Ranchi8Amritsar8Dehradun7Himachal Pradesh6Telangana5Varanasi4Orissa3Rajasthan3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)178Section 194A177Section 20197TDS97Deduction91Section 25088Condonation of Delay75Limitation/Time-bar68Exemption62Section 197A

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 366/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

Showing 1–20 of 131 · Page 1 of 7

22
Section 19119
Section 194C18

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 364/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRICLE-51(10, NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 388/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 387/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 389/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 361/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 359/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 392/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 360/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 386/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 365/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 363/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 362/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

Appeals are partly allowed/allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 391/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Agrawal, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

section 201(1). Needless to say, the assessee will be allowed adequate opportunity of hearing in such fresh proceedings.” We adopt the above reasoning mutatis mutandis in 6. the instant batch of assessees’ appeals going by judicial consistency to restore all these substantive grounds on merits back to the Assessing Officer in very terms. Ordered accordingly. No other ground

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (TDS), CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 277/NAG/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Aug 2023AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri R.S.Syal & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryassessment Year : 2012-13 Bank Of India, Dcit (Tds), Hingna Branch, Nagpur Zonal Office, Vs. Circle-1, 3Rd Floor, Csd Dept., Kingsways, Nagpur Nagpur – 440 001, Maharashtra Pan : Aaacb0472C Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal
Section 194ASection 200Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)Section 201(3)(i)Section 250

section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted four cases, as tabulated on page 4 of his order, where interest paid was more than

INDOWORTH INDIA LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), CIRCLE 51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 4/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Sept 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri R.K. GaneriwalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

section 201(3) the Financial Act, 2012. 3. The non–deduction TDS and interest thereon u/s 201(1) and 201

M/S INDOWORTH INDIA LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. ACIT(TDS), CIRCLE 51(1) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 3/NAG/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur23 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri R.K. GaneriwalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 201Section 201(1)Section 201(3)

section 201(3) the Financial Act, 2012. 3. The non–deduction TDS and interest thereon u/s 201(1) and 201

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 170/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy, (Through Physical Hearing)

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS Circle-51(1), Reshimbag Branch Nagpur Assessee by : Shri Pratik Sadrani a/w Shri Milind Bhusari Revenue by : Shri Abhay Y. Marathe Date of Hearing – 29/04/2024 Date of Order – 29/04/2024 O R D E R PER BENCH These twenty appeals arise out of different orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, under section 250 of the Income

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 171/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy, (Through Physical Hearing)

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS Circle-51(1), Reshimbag Branch Nagpur Assessee by : Shri Pratik Sadrani a/w Shri Milind Bhusari Revenue by : Shri Abhay Y. Marathe Date of Hearing – 29/04/2024 Date of Order – 29/04/2024 O R D E R PER BENCH These twenty appeals arise out of different orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, under section 250 of the Income

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 172/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy, (Through Physical Hearing)

Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS Circle-51(1), Reshimbag Branch Nagpur Assessee by : Shri Pratik Sadrani a/w Shri Milind Bhusari Revenue by : Shri Abhay Y. Marathe Date of Hearing – 29/04/2024 Date of Order – 29/04/2024 O R D E R PER BENCH These twenty appeals arise out of different orders passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, under section 250 of the Income