BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

28 results for “section 68”+ Section 115Vclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14A46Section 153A26Disallowance26Addition to Income21Section 1413Section 143(3)10Section 43B10Section 144C8Transfer Pricing7Section 1436Section 1156Deduction2

PFS SHIPPING (I) LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 1(2), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal preferred by the Assessee [ITA No

ITA 1347/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2013-14
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Dr. Yogesh Kamat
Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 57

68 as unexplained cash credit on assumptions and surmises, without appreciating that- i) Out of the loan amount of Rs.53,19,90,430/-, Rs. 20.40 Crs. was directly received form OOSPL, Rs. 19.19 Crs. and Rs. 13.58 Crs. was received respectively from PRP International, and Nissim Traders Pvt. Ltd., on behalf of OOSPL. ii) OOSPL is assessed to income

DEPUTY CIT-5(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. M/S ESSAR SHIPPING LIMITED , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue stands dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2

ITA 821/MUM/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Nov 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Shri M Balaganesh, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 821/Mum/2022 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2015-16) M/S Essar Shipping Dy. Cit-Circle – 5(3)(1), Limited R. No. 568, Aayakar बिधम/ Essar House, 11, K K Bhavan, M. K. Road, Vs. Marg, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai-400 034 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aacce3707D (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Prakash R. Mane, Ld. Dr प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Manoj Patwari/ Shri Rishav Patwari, Ld. Ars सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 18.08.2022 Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 14.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Amit Shukla: The Aforesaid Appeal Has Been Filed By The Revenue Against Impugned Order Dated 28.02.2022, Passed By Ld. Cit (Appeals)-56, Mumbai For The Quantum Of Assessment Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S.

For Appellant: Shri Prakash R. ManeFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Patwari/ Shri
Section 115VSection 143(3)Section 28Section 43Section 92Section 92F

115V under Chapter XII-G of the Act and the Arm's Length Pricing adjustment made as per Section 92 to Section 92F under Chapter X of the Act has no application in this case. On this issue; 1.1 "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) is justified

TOLANI SHIPPING CO. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT,CIR-5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, this appeal by the assessee for A

ITA 6730/MUM/2018[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Mar 2021AY 2004-05
Section 10(33)Section 143(3)Section 14A

68,141/- which was claimed exempt under section 10(33) of the I.T. Act. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee-company has debited an interest expenses of Rs. 15,24,00,244/- in the profit and loss account but has not attributed any expenditure towards earning of such exempt income. The assessee argued before the AO that investments

TOLANI SHIPPING CO. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT,CIR-5(3)(2), MUMBAI

Appeal stands dismissed whereas the assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed

ITA 4136/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Mar 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri C.N. Prasad, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.4136/Mum/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.4137/Mum/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) M/S. Tolani Shipping Co. Ltd. Dcit–Circle-5(3)(2) बनाम/ Room No.518, 5Th Floor 10-A, Bakhtawar Nariman Point Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road Vs. Mumbai-400021. Mumbai-400 020. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaact-4127-C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.4743/Mum/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) & आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.4742/Mum/2017 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13) Dcit–Circle-5(3)(2) M/S. Tolani Shipping Co. Ltd. Room No.518, 5Th Floor बनाम/ 10-A, Bakhtawar Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road Nariman Point Vs. Mumbai-400 020. Mumbai-400021. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaact-4127-C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : Assessee By : Shri Rajiv Khandelwal-Ld. Ar Revenue By : Shri Amit Pratap Singh-Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/ : 10/01/2010 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 13/03/2020 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Amit Pratap Singh-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 115VSection 14Section 14ASection 14A(1)

115V to 115VZB)and hence question of disallowance of EXPENDITURE u/s.14A under Chapter IV does not arise. 6. The Learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the addition u/s.l4A to the TONNAGE TAX INCOME computed by Appellant in Return of Income under Chapter XIIG of the Act overlooking that TONNAGE TAX INCOME is computed on deemed income basis on the TONNAGE

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1596/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2024AY 2013-14
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

68,66,467/- (as against the net interest expenditure attributable to the non-tonnage tax activities of Rs. 1,34,16,234/- considered by the assessee while applying clause 2(ii) of Rule 8D) and computed the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) at Rs.34,47,00,310/-, The AO also disallowed a further notional amount

ACIT-CIRCLE-5(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2426/MUM/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

68,66,467/- (as against the net interest expenditure attributable to the non-tonnage tax activities of Rs. 1,34,16,234/- considered by the assessee while applying clause 2(ii) of Rule 8D) and computed the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) at Rs.34,47,00,310/-, The AO also disallowed a further notional amount

DCIT CIR 5(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2076/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

68,66,467/- (as against the net interest expenditure attributable to the non-tonnage tax activities of Rs. 1,34,16,234/- considered by the assessee while applying clause 2(ii) of Rule 8D) and computed the disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) at Rs.34,47,00,310/-, The AO also disallowed a further notional amount

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING COMPANY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and\nappeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1129/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2024AY 2011-12
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

115V-I of the Act and the tax is paid of\nincome computed in accordance with the provisions of Section\n115V-I of the Act based on the tonnage of the ships operated by\nthe assessee company. Accordingly, the gross receipts of the\ntonnage tax business (Rs.14,03,07,80,962/-) and the expenses\npertaining to the tonnage

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee (ITA number 1597/M/2018) is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1597/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Narfendrakumar Choudhary , Jm & & The Great Eastern Shipping Co. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income-Tax, Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Range-5(3), Esplanade House, 2 N D Floor, Vs. Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaact1565C The Dy. Commissioner Of Income- The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Tax, Ltd. Range-5(3), Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Vs. Esplanade House, 2 N D Floor, Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jeet Kamdar , Shri Falee HFor Respondent: Shri
Section 115Section 14Section 143Section 144C

68,113. The book profit was also enhanced by disallowance under section 14 A of the act. 15. Assessee preferred an objection before the learned dispute resolution panel, directions were passed under section 144C (5) of the act on 12/11/2014. On the ground of the judicial consistency, the dispute resolution panel directed the learned assessing officer to delete

DCIT CIR 5(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee (ITA number 1597/M/2018) is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2077/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Narender Kumar Choudhary , Jm & & The Great Eastern Shipping Co. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income-Tax, Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Range-5(3), Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Vs. Room No.525B, 5 Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaact1565C The Dy. Commissioner Of Income- The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Tax, Ltd. Range-5(3), Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Vs. Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jeet Kamdar , Shri Falee HFor Respondent: Shri
Section 115Section 14Section 143Section 144C

68,113. The book profit was also enhanced by disallowance under section 14 A of the act. 15. Assessee preferred an objection before the learned dispute resolution panel, directions were passed under section 144C (5) of the act on 12/11/2014. On the ground of the judicial consistency, the dispute resolution panel directed the learned assessing officer to delete

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIR 5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee (ITA number 1597/M/2018) is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1216/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Narfendrakumar Choudhary , Jm & & The Great Eastern Shipping Co. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income-Tax, Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Range-5(3), Esplanade House, 2 N D Floor, Vs. Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaact1565C The Dy. Commissioner Of Income- The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Tax, Ltd. Range-5(3), Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Vs. Esplanade House, 2 N D Floor, Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jeet Kamdar , Shri Falee HFor Respondent: Shri
Section 115Section 14Section 143Section 144C

68,113. The book profit was also enhanced by disallowance under section 14 A of the act. 15. Assessee preferred an objection before the learned dispute resolution panel, directions were passed under section 144C (5) of the act on 12/11/2014. On the ground of the judicial consistency, the dispute resolution panel directed the learned assessing officer to delete

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIR 5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee (ITA number 1597/M/2018) is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 374/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Narfendrakumar Choudhary , Jm & & The Great Eastern Shipping Co. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income-Tax, Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Range-5(3), Esplanade House, 2 N D Floor, Vs. Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaact1565C The Dy. Commissioner Of Income- The Great Eastern Shipping Co. Tax, Ltd. Range-5(3), Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Vs. Esplanade House, 2 N D Floor, Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jeet Kamdar , Shri Falee HFor Respondent: Shri
Section 115Section 14Section 143Section 144C

68,113. The book profit was also enhanced by disallowance under section 14 A of the act. 15. Assessee preferred an objection before the learned dispute resolution panel, directions were passed under section 144C (5) of the act on 12/11/2014. On the ground of the judicial consistency, the dispute resolution panel directed the learned assessing officer to delete

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CIRCLE 5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed and\nappeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 1795/MUM/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jan 2024AY 2015-16
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 43B

115V-I of the Act and the tax is paid of\nincome computed in accordance with the provisions of Section\n115V-I of the Act based on the tonnage of the ships operated by\nthe assessee company. Accordingly, the gross receipts of the\ntonnage tax business (Rs.14,03,07,80,962/-) and the expenses\npertaining to the tonnage

THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT RG 5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 1656/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm The Great Eastern Shipping Co. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income-Tax, Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Range-5(3), Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Vs. Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaact1565C The Dy. Commissioner Of The Great Eastern Shipping Income-Tax, Co. Ltd. Range-5(3), Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Vs. Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Mishra, CIT DR
Section 115Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14A

115V-I of the Act, based on the tonnage of the ships operated by assessee .Hence, the gross receipts of the tonnage tax business and the expenses pertaining to the tonnage tax business are excluded while computing the Business Income of the Appellant Company. As per the ROI filed in computation of Total Income Assessee has the worked out actual

DCIT 5(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. THE GREAT EASTERN SHIPPING CO.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the learned assessing officer is dismissed

ITA 3272/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm The Great Eastern Shipping Co. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income-Tax, Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Range-5(3), Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Vs. Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 001 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaact1565C The Dy. Commissioner Of The Great Eastern Shipping Income-Tax, Co. Ltd. Range-5(3), Kalyaniwalla & Mistry Llp Vs. Esplanade House, 2 Nd Floor, Room No.525B, 5Th Floor, M.K. Marg, 29, Hazarimal Somani Marg, Mumbai-400 020 Fort, Mumbai-400 001 (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Jitendra Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Mishra, CIT DR
Section 115Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14A

115V-I of the Act, based on the tonnage of the ships operated by assessee .Hence, the gross receipts of the tonnage tax business and the expenses pertaining to the tonnage tax business are excluded while computing the Business Income of the Appellant Company. As per the ROI filed in computation of Total Income Assessee has the worked out actual

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2258/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

115V provides definition describing „qualifying ship‟ and sea going ship in the following manner:- (a)…. (b)…. (c)…. (d)….. (e)…. (f)….. Samson Maritime Ltd., (g)…. (h) "qualifying ship" means a ship referred to in section 115-VD. (i) "seagoing ship" means a ship if it is certified as such by the competent authority of any country; (k) "tonnage tax activities

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2259/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

115V provides definition describing „qualifying ship‟ and sea going ship in the following manner:- (a)…. (b)…. (c)…. (d)….. (e)…. (f)….. Samson Maritime Ltd., (g)…. (h) "qualifying ship" means a ship referred to in section 115-VD. (i) "seagoing ship" means a ship if it is certified as such by the competent authority of any country; (k) "tonnage tax activities

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CC-5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2261/MUM/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

115V provides definition describing „qualifying ship‟ and sea going ship in the following manner:- (a)…. (b)…. (c)…. (d)….. (e)…. (f)….. Samson Maritime Ltd., (g)…. (h) "qualifying ship" means a ship referred to in section 115-VD. (i) "seagoing ship" means a ship if it is certified as such by the competent authority of any country; (k) "tonnage tax activities

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-53, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2262/MUM/2023[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2016-2017

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

115V provides definition describing „qualifying ship‟ and sea going ship in the following manner:- (a)…. (b)…. (c)…. (d)….. (e)…. (f)….. Samson Maritime Ltd., (g)…. (h) "qualifying ship" means a ship referred to in section 115-VD. (i) "seagoing ship" means a ship if it is certified as such by the competent authority of any country; (k) "tonnage tax activities

SAMSON MARITIME LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 5(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 2263/MUM/2023[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Mar 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), MS PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member)

Section 153A

115V provides definition describing „qualifying ship‟ and sea going ship in the following manner:- (a)…. (b)…. (c)…. (d)….. (e)…. (f)….. Samson Maritime Ltd., (g)…. (h) "qualifying ship" means a ship referred to in section 115-VD. (i) "seagoing ship" means a ship if it is certified as such by the competent authority of any country; (k) "tonnage tax activities