DEPUTY CIT-5(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. M/S ESSAR SHIPPING LIMITED, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the foreign dividend income can be set off against current year's loss as there is no restriction in Section 115BBD of the Income Tax Act. The other grounds raised by the revenue were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order which vacated an adjustment on interest on ship acquisition and restricted a transfer pricing adjustment. The CIT(A) also allowed set off of foreign dividend income against current year's loss.
What were the issues?
Whether foreign dividend income can be set off against current year's loss under Section 115BBD, and the applicability of transfer pricing provisions to tonnage tax schemes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 115BBD,Section 115V,Section 92,Section 92F,Section 36(1)(iii),Section 71
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(6)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Pruthvi Brokers & Shareholders956 citing349 ITR 336 · 2012 · HC
- Vodafone India Services (P.) Ltd. v. Union of India172 citing50 Taxmann.com 300 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. RPG Transmissions Ltd.56 citing359 ITR 673 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd.33 citing370 ITR 728 · 2015 · HC
- Vodafone Services Pvt.ltd. v. UOI13 citing53 Taxmann.com 286 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Phil Corporation Ltd.10 citing244 CTR 226 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM, & SHRI M BALAGANESH, AM
Per Amit Shukla, Judicial Member:
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the revenue against impugned order dated 28.02.2022, passed by Ld. CIT (Appeals)-56, Mumbai for the quantum of assessment passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s.
2 M/s Essar Shipping Limited 144C for AY 2015-16. The revenue has taken following grounds of appeal:-
1 The Ld. CIT(A) has vacated the adjustment of Rs.6,93,533/- made on account of interest on ship acquisition on BBCD basis (hire purchase basis) on the g
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BBD
- ACIT CC 7(3), Mumbai vs Tata Projects Limited, MumbaiITA 3401/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Asian Paints Limited, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle…ITA 3489/MUM/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Apr 2026AY 2021-22
- Upama Roy, Karnataka vs Income Tax Officer-Ward-5(3) (4), KarnatakaITA 1970/BANG/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed1 Apr 2026AY 2018-2019
- Bahwan Cybertek Private Limited, Chennai vs ACIT, Corporate Range -1, ChennaiITTPA 51/CHNY/2023[2014-15]Status: Disposed11 Nov 2025AY 2014-15
- Bahwan Cybertek Private Limited, Chennai vs ACIT, Corporate Range -1, ChennaiITTPA 50/CHNY/2023[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Nov 2025AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026