BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

126 results for “reassessment”+ Section 194clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi193Mumbai126Jaipur73Chandigarh65Raipur39Chennai34Ahmedabad21Kolkata21Guwahati17Bangalore15Amritsar14Indore7Surat6Cochin6Hyderabad5Lucknow5Jodhpur4Cuttack4Rajkot4Agra4Pune4Patna3Nagpur1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 14880Addition to Income79Section 14774Section 143(3)72Disallowance46Section 69A32Reopening of Assessment32Section 2(22)(e)26Section 25025

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD ,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2616/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar&
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 37(1) of the Act.We have perused the aforesaid decision of the Tribunal in that case it was stated, during the assessment proceeding, the assessing officer noted that as per material available on record, the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence, Chennai Zone (DGCEI) had carried out investigation in respect of certain auto dealers and intermediaries. In course

Showing 1–20 of 126 · Page 1 of 7

Reassessment25
Search & Seizure24
Section 153C21

DCIT 3.2.1, MUMBAI vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2823/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar&
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 37(1) of the Act.We have perused the aforesaid decision of the Tribunal in that case it was stated, during the assessment proceeding, the assessing officer noted that as per material available on record, the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence, Chennai Zone (DGCEI) had carried out investigation in respect of certain auto dealers and intermediaries. In course

THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(2)(2), MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2622/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar&
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 37(1) of the Act.We have perused the aforesaid decision of the Tribunal in that case it was stated, during the assessment proceeding, the assessing officer noted that as per material available on record, the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence, Chennai Zone (DGCEI) had carried out investigation in respect of certain auto dealers and intermediaries. In course

DCIT 3.2.1, MUMBAI vs. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LIMITED, MUMBAI

Accordingly, Ground No.1 to 4 raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2830/MUM/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri Farooq IraniFor Respondent: Shri Satya Pal Kumar&
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 37(1) of the Act.We have perused the aforesaid decision of the Tribunal in that case it was stated, during the assessment proceeding, the assessing officer noted that as per material available on record, the Director General of Central Excise Intelligence, Chennai Zone (DGCEI) had carried out investigation in respect of certain auto dealers and intermediaries. In course

IMPRESSIVE TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 10(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, all the above appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 7299/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Vajani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, (Sr. DR)
Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 148ASection 151A

reassessment notices would have to be issued within the time limit surviving. To understand how the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal would apply to the present case, it would be apposite to set out in the following table the notices etc issued in the present case. 1. 30-06-2021 Notice under

IMPRESSIVE TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 10(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, all the above appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 7300/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Vajani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Virabhadra S. Mahajan, (Sr. DR)
Section 147Section 147oSection 148Section 148ASection 151A

reassessment notices would have to be issued within the time limit surviving. To understand how the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal would apply to the present case, it would be apposite to set out in the following table the notices etc issued in the present case. 1. 30-06-2021 Notice under

ANNAPURNA INFRATECH,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 252/MUM/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Apr 2025AY 2016-2017
For Appellant: Shri Tarang MehtaFor Respondent: Dr. K.R. Subhash, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

194/- in AY 2015-16 and Rs.1,43,05,438/- in AY 2016-17. It is pertinent to note that both these years fall under the category of ‘unabated assessment years'. It is well settled proposition of law that the AO is entitled to make addition in the assessment completed u/s 153A of the Act in the unabated assessment years

SHIVALIK VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CC 8(1) , MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 1444/MUM/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Aug 2025AY 2020-2021
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 194Section 250Section 40

reassessment proceedings were initiated based upon\ntangible, credible, and previously undisclosed information resulting from the\nsurvey action u/s 133A conducted on 07.10.2021. This survey clearly revealed\ncritical facts regarding the appellant's non-deduction of TDS under Section 194

SHIVALIK VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CC 8(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

ITA 1442/MUM/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Aug 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Ms Padmavathy S, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

For Respondent: Shri Arun Kanti Datta, CIT-DR
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 194ISection 250Section 40

reassessment proceedings were initiated based upon tangible, credible, and previously undisclosed information resulting from the survey action u/s 133A conducted on 07.10.2021. This survey clearly revealed critical facts regarding the appellant's non-deduction of TDS under Section 194

SHIVALIK VENTURES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CC 8(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI

Accordingly we direct the AO to delete the disallowance made under section\n36(1)(va) of the Act for AY 2019-20 & 2020-21 also.\n15. In result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2018-19 to AY 2020...

ITA 1443/MUM/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Aug 2025AY 2019-2020
Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 194Section 250Section 40

reassessment proceedings were initiated based upon\ntangible, credible, and previously undisclosed information resulting from the\nsurvey action u/s 133A conducted on 07.10.2021. This survey clearly revealed\ncritical facts regarding the appellant's non-deduction of TDS under Section 194

IMPRESSIVE TRADING PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 10(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, all the above appeals in ITA Nos

ITA 7298/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Feb 2026AY 2013-14
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151A

reassessment notices would have to be issued within the time\nlimit surviving. To understand how the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme\nCourt in Rajeev Bansal would apply to the present case, it would be apposite to\nset out in the following table the notices etc issued in the present case.\n1. 30-06-2021 Notice under

ABDUL SALAM MOHAMED YASIN,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 17(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed on legal grounds

ITA 7502/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Jan 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: 1. Assessment Year
Section 07Section 1Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 149(1)Section 151

reassessment proceedings. The present case squarely falls within this interdicted zone, where the notice is not only ex facie time-barred but is also vitiated by non-compliance with the mandatory sanctional regime under section 151(ii) of the Act. 10. Section 151(ii) of the Act unambiguously provides that where more than three years have elapsed from

ANNAPURNA INFRATECH,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 251/MUM/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Apr 2025AY 2015-2016

194/- in AY\n2015-16 and Rs.1,43,05,438/- in AY 2016-17. It is pertinent to note that\nboth these years fall under the category of ‘unabated assessment years'. It\nis well settled proposition of law that the AO is entitled to make addition in\nthe assessment completed u/s 153A of the Act in the unabated\n assessment

SAI PRERNA CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 17(3) (2) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are decided as under:

ITA 221/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 217, 220 & 221, 218 & 219, 215, 214/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 Sai Prerana Co-Op Credit Ito-17(3)(2), Society Ltd., Room No. 126, 1St Floor, Vs. 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Narashi Natha Street, Katha 43, G Block Bandra Kurla Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 009. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aadts 5638 M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Milind S. Chavan, DR
Section 139(1)

194 & 195/MUM/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21 ITO-26(2)(1), Sai Prerana Co-op Credit Society Room No. 127, 1st floor, G- Ltd., Vs. Block, Kautilya Bhavan, 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Bandra Kurla Complex, NarashiNatha Street, Katha Mumbai-400051. Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Mumbai-400 009. PAN No. AADTS 5638 M Appellant

ITO-26(2)(1) , MUMBAI vs. SAI PRERANA CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are decided as under:

ITA 195/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 217, 220 & 221, 218 & 219, 215, 214/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 Sai Prerana Co-Op Credit Ito-17(3)(2), Society Ltd., Room No. 126, 1St Floor, Vs. 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Narashi Natha Street, Katha 43, G Block Bandra Kurla Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 009. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aadts 5638 M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Milind S. Chavan, DR
Section 139(1)

194 & 195/MUM/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21 ITO-26(2)(1), Sai Prerana Co-op Credit Society Room No. 127, 1st floor, G- Ltd., Vs. Block, Kautilya Bhavan, 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Bandra Kurla Complex, NarashiNatha Street, Katha Mumbai-400051. Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Mumbai-400 009. PAN No. AADTS 5638 M Appellant

INCOME TAX OFFICER-26(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. SAI PRERANA CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are decided as under:

ITA 194/MUM/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 217, 220 & 221, 218 & 219, 215, 214/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 Sai Prerana Co-Op Credit Ito-17(3)(2), Society Ltd., Room No. 126, 1St Floor, Vs. 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Narashi Natha Street, Katha 43, G Block Bandra Kurla Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 009. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aadts 5638 M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Milind S. Chavan, DR
Section 139(1)

194 & 195/MUM/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21 ITO-26(2)(1), Sai Prerana Co-op Credit Society Room No. 127, 1st floor, G- Ltd., Vs. Block, Kautilya Bhavan, 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Bandra Kurla Complex, NarashiNatha Street, Katha Mumbai-400051. Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Mumbai-400 009. PAN No. AADTS 5638 M Appellant

ITO-26(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. SAI PRERANA CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are decided as under:

ITA 193/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 217, 220 & 221, 218 & 219, 215, 214/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 Sai Prerana Co-Op Credit Ito-17(3)(2), Society Ltd., Room No. 126, 1St Floor, Vs. 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Narashi Natha Street, Katha 43, G Block Bandra Kurla Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 009. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aadts 5638 M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Milind S. Chavan, DR
Section 139(1)

194 & 195/MUM/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21 ITO-26(2)(1), Sai Prerana Co-op Credit Society Room No. 127, 1st floor, G- Ltd., Vs. Block, Kautilya Bhavan, 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Bandra Kurla Complex, NarashiNatha Street, Katha Mumbai-400051. Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Mumbai-400 009. PAN No. AADTS 5638 M Appellant

SAI PRERNA CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 17(3) (2) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are decided as under:

ITA 220/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 217, 220 & 221, 218 & 219, 215, 214/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 Sai Prerana Co-Op Credit Ito-17(3)(2), Society Ltd., Room No. 126, 1St Floor, Vs. 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Narashi Natha Street, Katha 43, G Block Bandra Kurla Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 009. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aadts 5638 M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Milind S. Chavan, DR
Section 139(1)

194 & 195/MUM/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21 ITO-26(2)(1), Sai Prerana Co-op Credit Society Room No. 127, 1st floor, G- Ltd., Vs. Block, Kautilya Bhavan, 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Bandra Kurla Complex, NarashiNatha Street, Katha Mumbai-400051. Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Mumbai-400 009. PAN No. AADTS 5638 M Appellant

INCOME TAX OFFICER-26(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. SAI PRERANA CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are decided as under:

ITA 192/MUM/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 217, 220 & 221, 218 & 219, 215, 214/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 Sai Prerana Co-Op Credit Ito-17(3)(2), Society Ltd., Room No. 126, 1St Floor, Vs. 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Narashi Natha Street, Katha 43, G Block Bandra Kurla Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 009. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aadts 5638 M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Milind S. Chavan, DR
Section 139(1)

194 & 195/MUM/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21 ITO-26(2)(1), Sai Prerana Co-op Credit Society Room No. 127, 1st floor, G- Ltd., Vs. Block, Kautilya Bhavan, 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Bandra Kurla Complex, NarashiNatha Street, Katha Mumbai-400051. Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Mumbai-400 009. PAN No. AADTS 5638 M Appellant

SAI PRERNA CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO WD 17(3) (2) , MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are In the result, appeals of the assessee and the Revenue are decided as under:

ITA 217/MUM/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh () & Shri Om Prakash Kant () Ita Nos. 217, 220 & 221, 218 & 219, 215, 214/Mum/2023 Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19, 2020-21 Sai Prerana Co-Op Credit Ito-17(3)(2), Society Ltd., Room No. 126, 1St Floor, Vs. 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Narashi Natha Street, Katha 43, G Block Bandra Kurla Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400 009. Mumbai-400051. Pan No. Aadts 5638 M Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Mr. Bharat Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Milind S. Chavan, DR
Section 139(1)

194 & 195/MUM/2023 Assessment Year: 2016-17, 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2020-21 ITO-26(2)(1), Sai Prerana Co-op Credit Society Room No. 127, 1st floor, G- Ltd., Vs. Block, Kautilya Bhavan, 317, Puran Aasha Bldg, Gr. Fl. Bandra Kurla Complex, NarashiNatha Street, Katha Mumbai-400051. Bazar Masjid Bunder (W), Mumbai-400 009. PAN No. AADTS 5638 M Appellant