IMPRESSIVE TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 10(1)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notices issued under Section 148 of the Act and the consequential assessment orders were null and void due to being time-barred. Consequently, the legal grounds of appeal were allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals concerned reassessment orders for AYs 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16. The primary contention was that the reopening of assessment and subsequent notices were time-barred and invalid.
What were the issues?
The key issues were whether the reassessment notices were issued within the prescribed time limits, considering the Supreme Court's rulings on the transition period for reassessments, and if the reopening was based on valid grounds.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal713 citing167 Taxmann.com 70 · 2024 · SC · Read judgment
- Union of India v. Ashish Agarwal524 citing444 ITR 1 · 2022 · SC · Read judgment
- Ram Balram Buildhome (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer47 citing477 ITR 133 · 2025 · HC
- State of A P v. A P Pensioners Association37 citing13 SCC 161 · 2005
- Dhanraj Govindram Kella v. ITO22 citing177 Taxmann.com 194 · 2025 · HC
- Mrs. Thulasidass Prabavathi v. Income-tax Officer12 citing174 Taxmann.com 508 · 2025 · HC
- (i) Gurpreet Singh v. DCIT6 citing176 Taxmann.com 673 · 2025 · HC
Before: SHRI NARENDRA KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
PER BENCH :- The above captioned appeals preferred by the assessee emanate from the orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “CIT(A)”] pertaining to assessment orders u/s. 147of the Income- tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “Act”] for the Assessment Years
P a g e | 2 ITA No. 7298, 7299& 7300/Mum/2025 A.Y. 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16 Impressive Trading Pvt Ltd., Mumbai [A.Ys.] 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16.Since t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026