JCIT CENT. CIR. - 1(4), MUMBAI vs. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed whereas appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal () Assessment Year: 2010-11 Grasim Industries Limited, The Dcit Cc-1(4), Corporate Finance Division, Room No. 902, 9Th Floor, Old Vs. A-2, Aditya Birla Centre, S.K. Cgo Building, M.K. Road, Ahire Marg, Worli, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400030. Pan No. Aaacg 4464 B Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2010-11 Jcit (Osd), Central Circle- Grasim Industries Limited, 1(4), A-Wing, 2Nd Floor, Aditya Room No. 902, Pratishtha Vs. Birla Centre, S.K. Ahire Bhavan, 9Th Floor, Old Cgo Marg, Worli, Building Annexe, Mumbai-400030. Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacg 4464 B Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. Yogesh Thar & Mr. Chaitanya Joshi Revenue By : Dr. Kishor Dhule, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 03/04/2024 : Date Of Pronouncement 29/04/2024

block of assets for allowing depreciation allowance and ought to have directed the AO to re depreciation allowance and ought to have directed the AO to re depreciation allowance and ought to have directed the AO to re- compute depreciation allowance allowable to the Appellant for the compute depreciation allowance allowable to the Appellant for the compute depreciation allowance allowable

ANNAPURNA BUILDCON INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, THANE, THANE

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Anikesh Banerjee

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act seeks to assess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that the Assessing Officer shall assess or reassess

SAMBHAVANATH INFRABUILD FARMS (SUCCESSOR TO LODHA CONSTRUCTION P. LTD P. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ASSTT. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-7(3), MUMBAI

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blesambhavnath Infrabuild & Farms Pvt. Ltd., V. Asst. Cit– Central Circle – 7(3) {Successor To Lodha Construction Pvt. Ltd.,} Room No. 655, 6Th Floor 412, 4Th Floor, 17G Vardhaman Chamber Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Cawasji Patel Road, Horniman Circle Mumbai - 400020 Fort, Mumbai - 400001 Pan: Aalcs1394M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Anuj Kisnadwala Department By Shri B.K. Bagchi

block assessment concept was done way with the new scheme of assessment of search cases where the Assessing Officer is to assess or reassess

ACIT, CC- 2(1), MUMBAI vs. GOLDMEDAL ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD., KARNATAKA

In the result, the appeal

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2014-15 & Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Acit, Central Circle-2(1), M/S Goldmedal Electricals Pvt. Ltd., Old Cgo Building, 804, No. 7 G.K. Temple Street, Chickpet Vs. 8Th Floor, M.K. Road, Cross Bengaluru, Mumbai-400020. Karnataka-560 053 Pan No. Aaccg 9397 F Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kardam, Cit- Dr : Assessee By None Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2022 : Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2022

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act Gold Medal Electrical Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 2160 to 2165/M/2022 seeks toassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that

ACIT, CC- 2(1), MUMBAI vs. GOLDMEDAL ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2014-15 & Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Acit, Central Circle-2(1), M/S Goldmedal Electricals Pvt. Ltd., Old Cgo Building, 804, No. 7 G.K. Temple Street, Chickpet Vs. 8Th Floor, M.K. Road, Cross Bengaluru, Mumbai-400020. Karnataka-560 053 Pan No. Aaccg 9397 F Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kardam, Cit- Dr : Assessee By None Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2022 : Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2022

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act Gold Medal Electrical Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 2160 to 2165/M/2022 seeks toassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that

ACIT, CC- 2(1), MUMBAI vs. GOLDMEDAL ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD., KARNATAKA

In the result, the appeal

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2014-15 & Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Acit, Central Circle-2(1), M/S Goldmedal Electricals Pvt. Ltd., Old Cgo Building, 804, No. 7 G.K. Temple Street, Chickpet Vs. 8Th Floor, M.K. Road, Cross Bengaluru, Mumbai-400020. Karnataka-560 053 Pan No. Aaccg 9397 F Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kardam, Cit- Dr : Assessee By None Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2022 : Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2022

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act Gold Medal Electrical Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 2160 to 2165/M/2022 seeks toassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that

ACIT, CC- 2(1), MUMBAI vs. GOLDMEDAL ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD., KARNATAKA

In the result, the appeal

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2014-15 & Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Acit, Central Circle-2(1), M/S Goldmedal Electricals Pvt. Ltd., Old Cgo Building, 804, No. 7 G.K. Temple Street, Chickpet Vs. 8Th Floor, M.K. Road, Cross Bengaluru, Mumbai-400020. Karnataka-560 053 Pan No. Aaccg 9397 F Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kardam, Cit- Dr : Assessee By None Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2022 : Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2022

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act Gold Medal Electrical Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 2160 to 2165/M/2022 seeks toassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that

ACIT, CC- 2(1), MUMBAI vs. GOLDMEDAL ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD., BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2014-15 & Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Acit, Central Circle-2(1), M/S Goldmedal Electricals Pvt. Ltd., Old Cgo Building, 804, No. 7 G.K. Temple Street, Chickpet Vs. 8Th Floor, M.K. Road, Cross Bengaluru, Mumbai-400020. Karnataka-560 053 Pan No. Aaccg 9397 F Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kardam, Cit- Dr : Assessee By None Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2022 : Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2022

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act Gold Medal Electrical Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 2160 to 2165/M/2022 seeks toassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that

ACIT. -CC- 2(1), MUMBAI vs. GOLDMEDAL ELECTRICALS PVT. LTD., KARNATAKA

In the result, the appeal

Bench: Shri Om Prakash Kant () & Shri Rahul Chaudhary () Assessment Year: 2014-15 & Assessment Year: 2015-16 & Assessment Year: 2016-17 & Assessment Year: 2017-18 & Assessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-2020 Acit, Central Circle-2(1), M/S Goldmedal Electricals Pvt. Ltd., Old Cgo Building, 804, No. 7 G.K. Temple Street, Chickpet Vs. 8Th Floor, M.K. Road, Cross Bengaluru, Mumbai-400020. Karnataka-560 053 Pan No. Aaccg 9397 F Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Mr. Ashok Kumar Kardam, Cit- Dr : Assessee By None Date Of Hearing : 27/10/2022 : Date Of Pronouncement 28/11/2022

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act Gold Medal Electrical Pvt. Ltd. ITA Nos. 2160 to 2165/M/2022 seeks toassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is oassess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that

M/S. RAVI FOUNDATION ,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT-17, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is hereby allowed

Assessment Years: 2010-11) बनधम/ M/s. Ravi Foundation PCIT-17 Room No.120, 1st Floor, 76, Laxmi Palace, Vs. Mathuradas Road, Kandivali Kautilya Bhawan, C-41 (W), Mumbai-400067. to C-43, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex Bandra (E), Mumbai- 400051. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAAFR2515F (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Assessee by: Ms. Arati Aggarwal Revenue by: Shri

ANNAPURNA PROPERTIES,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Anikesh Banerjee- A.Y. 2015-16 - A.Y. 2016-17 - A.Y. 2017-18 - A.Y. 2018-19 - A.Y. 2019-20 - A.Y. 2020-21 - A.Y. 2021-22 Annapurna Properties, Vs Dcit, Central Circle-1, Shop No.6, Room No.10, 6Th Floor, Rachana Chg Ltd, Ashar It Park, Opp. Joggers Park, Wagle Industrial Estate, Behind Laxminarayan Temple, Thane (W) Borivali West, Maharashtra Mumbai Pan : Aapfa1330G Appellant Respondent

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act seeks to assess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that the Assessing Officer shall assess or reassess

ANNAPURNA PROPERTIES,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for the AYs

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Anikesh Banerjee- A.Y. 2015-16 - A.Y. 2016-17 - A.Y. 2017-18 - A.Y. 2018-19 - A.Y. 2019-20 - A.Y. 2020-21 - A.Y. 2021-22 Annapurna Properties, Vs Dcit, Central Circle-1, Shop No.6, Room No.10, 6Th Floor, Rachana Chg Ltd, Ashar It Park, Opp. Joggers Park, Wagle Industrial Estate, Behind Laxminarayan Temple, Thane (W) Borivali West, Maharashtra Mumbai Pan : Aapfa1330G Appellant Respondent

block period that was assessed, section 153A of the Act seeks to assess the total income for the assessment year, which is clear from the first proviso thereto which provides that the Assessing Officer shall assess or reassess

ACIT CC 24 & 26 CEN RG 5, MUMBAI vs. SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue and the Cross Objection of the assessee, both are dismissed

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Ashwani Taneja, Am Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Shri Samir Narain Bhojani 1St Floor, Samir Complex, Cc-3(4), Central Range-3, Mumbai Vs. St.Andrews Road, Opp. Holy Family Hospital, Bandra(W), Mumbai-400050 .. Appellant Respondent Co No.189/Mum/2015 (In Ita No.3814/Mum/2014 A.Y. 2006-07) Shri Samir Narain Bhojani Dy. Commissioner Of Income 1St Floor, Samir Complex, Tax, Cc-3(4), Central Range-3, St.Andrews Road, Opp. Holy Family Mumbai Vs. Hospital, Bandra(W), Mumbai- 400050 Pan No.Aabpb9150H Appellant .. Respondent

block assessment roped in only the undisclosed income and the regular assessment proceedings were preserved, resulting in multiple assessments. Under Section 153A, however, the Assessing Officer has been given the power to assess or reassess

ASST CIT 25(2), MUMBAI vs. PRATIKSHA SHAH, MUMBAI

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri N.K. Pradhan

reassess the total income of six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such search is conducted or requisition is made. Thus, the crucial words "search" and "requisition" appear in the substantive provision and the provisos. That would throw light on the issue of applicability of the provision. It being enacted

ACIT 25(2), MUMBAI vs. PRATIKSHA B SHAH, MUMBAI

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri N.K. Pradhan

reassess the total income of six assessment years immediately preceding the assessment year relevant to the previous year in which such search is conducted or requisition is made. Thus, the crucial words "search" and "requisition" appear in the substantive provision and the provisos. That would throw light on the issue of applicability of the provision. It being enacted

ASST CIT CC 24 & 26 CEN RG 5, MUMBAI vs. SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI, MUMBAI

In the result, all the four appeals of Revenue are dismissed and the three Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Ashwani Taneja, Am

block assessment roped in only the undisclosed income and the regular assessment proceedings were preserved, resulting in multiple assessments. Under Section 153A, however, the Assessing Officer has been given the power to assess or reassess

ACIT CC 24 & 26, MUMBAI vs. SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI, MUMBAI

In the result, all the four appeals of Revenue are dismissed and the three Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Ashwani Taneja, Am

block assessment roped in only the undisclosed income and the regular assessment proceedings were preserved, resulting in multiple assessments. Under Section 153A, however, the Assessing Officer has been given the power to assess or reassess

ASST CIT CC 24 & 26 CEN RG 5, MUMBAI vs. SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI, MUMBAI

In the result, all the four appeals of Revenue are dismissed and the three Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Ashwani Taneja, Am

block assessment roped in only the undisclosed income and the regular assessment proceedings were preserved, resulting in multiple assessments. Under Section 153A, however, the Assessing Officer has been given the power to assess or reassess

ASST CIT CC 24 & 26 CEN RG 5, MUMBAI vs. SAMIR NARAIN BHOJWANI, MUMBAI

In the result, all the four appeals of Revenue are dismissed and the three Cross Objections of the assessee are dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri Ashwani Taneja, Am

block assessment roped in only the undisclosed income and the regular assessment proceedings were preserved, resulting in multiple assessments. Under Section 153A, however, the Assessing Officer has been given the power to assess or reassess