H.K.ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. 7. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify alter and/or delete any of the above grounds before or during the course of hearing of appeal." 3. Ground of appeal nos. 1 & 2 are general in nature and dealt with other grounds of appeal. 4. In ground of appeal

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT-CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. 7. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify alter and/or delete any of the above grounds before or during the course of hearing of appeal." 3. Ground of appeal nos. 1 & 2 are general in nature and dealt with other grounds of appeal. 4. In ground of appeal

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. 7. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify alter and/or delete any of the above grounds before or during the course of hearing of appeal." 3. Ground of appeal nos. 1 & 2 are general in nature and dealt with other grounds of appeal. 4. In ground of appeal

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT-CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. 7. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify alter and/or delete any of the above grounds before or during the course of hearing of appeal." 3. Ground of appeal nos. 1 & 2 are general in nature and dealt with other grounds of appeal. 4. In ground of appeal

H.K. ENTERPRISES,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT-CC-2(4), MUMBAI

In the result, all the eight appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

penalty proceedings u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. 7. The appellant craves leave to add, amend, modify alter and/or delete any of the above grounds before or during the course of hearing of appeal." 3. Ground of appeal nos. 1 & 2 are general in nature and dealt with other grounds of appeal. 4. In ground of appeal

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI.

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the\nassessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of\nthe assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not\naccepted.\n05.\nThe assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to\nnotice under section 153A (1) of the act issued on 18/6/2018. The\nlearned

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI MUMBAI, MUMBAI

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the\nassessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of\nthe assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not\naccepted.\n05.\nThe assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to\nnotice under section 153A (1) of the act issued on 18/6/2018. The\nlearned

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the\nassessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of\nthe assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not\naccepted.\n05.\nThe assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to\nnotice under section 153A (1) of the act issued on 18/6/2018. The\nlearned

SHIRISH CHANDRAKANT SHAH,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), MUMBAI

Accordingly, grounds raised by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1170, 1172, 1173 & 1174/Mum/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 1991-92 To 1994-95)

Section 245D(1) of the Act were also passed and taxes on the declared income was also paid. He brought to our notice at para 15.1 at page no. 55 of the paper book of the settlement commission’s order, which is reproduced below:- “15.1 Out of this income the applicant is entitled to get set off of the income

GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD ( CORPORATE FINANCE DIVISION),MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT RG 6(3), MUMBAI

Bench: the CIT(A). The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal preferred by the Assessee vide order, dated 18/05/2009. 4. Not being satisfied with the relief granted by the Id. CIT(A), the Assessee has preferred appeal before this Tribunal. The Revenue has also filed cross-appeal challenging the relief granted by the Id. CIT(A).

penalty to the date on which the refund is granted. (3) Where, as a result of an order under sub-section (3) of section 115WE or section 115WF or section 115WG or sub- section (3) of section 143 or section 144 or section 147 or section 154 or section 155 or section 250 or section 254 or section

ACIT 6(3), MUMBAI vs. GRASIM INDUSTRIES LTD, MUMBAI

penalty to the date on which the refund is\ngranted.\n(3) Where, as a result of an order under sub-section (3) of\nsection 115WE or section 115WF or section 115WG or sub-\nsection (3) of section 143 or section 144 or section 147 or\nsection 154 or section 155 or section 250 or section 254 or\nsection

HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the\nassessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of\nthe assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not\naccepted.\n05.\nThe assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to\nnotice under section 153A (1) of the act issued on 18/6/2018. The\nlearned

HELLIOS EXPORTS LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-8(2), MUMBAI

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the\nassessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of\nthe assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not\naccepted.\nPage | 10\nITA No.1275/Mum/2022\nSVP southwest Industries Ltd; A.Y. 16-17 & Ors\n05.\nThe assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to\nnotice

SHRIVALLABH PITTE INDUSTRIES LTD MUMBAI,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1),MUMBAI, MUMBAI

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the\nassessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of\nthe assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not\naccepted.\n05.\nThe assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to\nnotice under section 153A (1) of the act issued on 18/6/2018. The\nlearned

DCIT CEN CIR 8(2), MUMBAI vs. DORF KETAL CHEMICALS (I) P.LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2004-05 & Assessment Year: 2005-06

271(1)(c), where a claim is disallowed, the assessee is deemed to have concealed/file inaccurate particulars of income only if he fails to establish that the claim was bona fide. 7.4 In cases, where appellant is unable to substantiate the claim, penalty can be imposed only if the appellant fails to prove that the claim was bona fide

ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI vs. HELIOS MERCANTILE LIMITED, MUMBAI

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the\nassessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of\nthe assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not\naccepted.\n05.\nThe assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to\nnotice under section 153A (1) of the act issued on 18/6/2018. The\nlearned

SHRIVALLABH PITTE INDUSTRIES LTD ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRLE -6(1) , MUMBAI

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the\nassessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of\nthe assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not\naccepted.\n05.\nThe assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to\nnotice under section 153A (1) of the act issued on 18/6/2018. The\nlearned

SVP GLOBAL TEXTILES LTD FORMERLY SVP GLOBAL VENTURES LTD MUMBAI ,MUMBAI vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(1), MUMBAI , MUMBAI

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Jm

245D (4) of the Act passed its order disposing of the assessee's application and has not accepted the terms of settlement of the assessee group. Therefore, the terms of settlement were not accepted. SVP southwest Industries Ltd; A.Y. 16-17 & Ors The assessee filed its return of income on 2/11/2018 in response to 05. notice under section 153A (1