Search: penalty u/s 271

6 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 197Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai84 Karnataka25 Nagpur16 Kolkata9 Mumbai6 Panaji3 Jaipur3 Bangalore1

Key Topics

Section 234E57 Section 200A26 Section 15412 Section 220(2)12 TDS6 Section 200(3)5 Rectification u/s 1544

NATIONAL LAMINATE CORPORATION,MUMBAI vs. CPC (TDS), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

ITA 4902/MUM/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Dec 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Ms. Kavita P. Kaushik – Ld. DR

Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

271(1)(a) cannot be imposed if the deductor complies with the requirement of sub- 9 Assessment Year :2013-14 National Laminate Corporation section (3) of Section 271H. Hence, it can be said that the fee provided under Section 234E would take out from the rigors of penalty under Section 271H but of course subject to the outer limit

NATIONAL LAMINATE CORPORATION,MUMBAI vs. CPC (TDS), MUMBAI

NATIONAL LAMINATE CORPORATION,MUMBAI vs. CPC (TDS), MUMBAI

LAWMEN CONCEPTS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-CPC-TDS , MUMBAI

LATE SHRI JAYEESH THAR ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD KALYAN , KALYAN

LATE JAYESH THAR ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN, KALYAN

LATE JAYESH THAR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN, KALYAN

LATE SHRI JAYESH THAR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN , KALYAN