BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

51 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 12Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi95Mumbai51Bangalore49Hyderabad35Calcutta34Ahmedabad30Lucknow16Jaipur16Visakhapatnam12Chandigarh11Indore9Pune9Amritsar9Allahabad8Cochin6Kolkata5Patna4Rajkot3Jodhpur2Raipur2Surat2Nagpur2

Key Topics

Section 1167Section 12A46Section 271(1)(c)46Exemption33Penalty33Section 143(3)31Addition to Income31Section 26328Section 11(1)18Section 147

ITO WD 4(4), THANE vs. VIDYAVARDHINI TRUST, THANE

In the result, all these three appeals filed in all the above said years, involving identical facts, are dismissed

ITA 3839/MUM/2014[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jan 2016AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Ashwani Taneja

Section 11Section 12ASection 132Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

271(1)(c) in respect of the first type of additions.” 3.6. It is thus, noted that the Hon’ble ITAT has restored the benefit of registration u/s 12A to the assessee. Thus, as on date, impugned additions/disallowances do not survive any more. Thus, in our considered view, Ld. CIT(A) has rightly deleted the penalty levied

ITO WD 4(4), THANE vs. VIDYAVARDHINI TRUST, THANE

Showing 1–20 of 51 · Page 1 of 3

17
Section 11(2)16
Charitable Trust16

In the result, all these three appeals filed in all the above said years, involving identical facts, are dismissed

ITA 3840/MUM/2014[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jan 2016AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Ashwani Taneja

Section 11Section 12ASection 132Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)

271(1)(c) in respect of the first type of additions.” 3.6. It is thus, noted that the Hon’ble ITAT has restored the benefit of registration u/s 12A to the assessee. Thus, as on date, impugned additions/disallowances do not survive any more. Thus, in our considered view, Ld. CIT(A) has rightly deleted the penalty levied

OPTIONS DEVELOPRS AND BUILDERS,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CE CIR 22, MUMBAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed and the ld

ITA 7129/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 May 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ashwani Tanejaassessment Year: 2010-11 Options Developers & Acit, Central Circle-22, Builders, Room No.465, बनाम/ 10, Mithila Shopping Centre Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Ground Floor, V. M. Road, M.K. Road, Juhu Scheme Vile Parle (W) Mumbai-400020 Mumbai-400049 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No.Aaafo6752F "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee By Shri Vijay Kothari Ms. Sudha Ramchandran-Dr राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue By 05/05/2016 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/05/2016 आदेश क" तार"ख /Date Of Order:

Section 132Section 271A

271(1)(c) was held to be not justified.” 2.17. The Kolkata Bench of the Tribunal in another case of SPS Steel & Power Ltd. vs ACIT (ITA No.1391 & 1414/Kol/2011) dismissed the appeal of the Revenue vide order dated 30/06/2015. The relevant portion from the aforesaid order is reproduced hereunder:- “6. We have heard rival contentions and gone through the facts

PROBODHAN PRAKASHAH,MUMBAI vs. ITO (E) II(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1529/MUM/2016[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 May 2018AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri Ramit Kochar, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Anil SatheFor Respondent: Shri M.C. Omi Ningshen
Section 11Section 271(1)(c)

penalty of Rs. 19,32,534/- 4 ITA.NO.1529 & 1531/MUM/2016 (A.Ys. 2003-04 & 1989 – 99) Prabodhan Prakashan. for the A.Y. 2007-08 and Rs. 18,62,354/- for the A.Y. 2008- 09 u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 4. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the AO before the learned CIT(A). It is found

PROBODHAN PRAKASHAH,MUMBAI vs. ITO (E) II(1), MUMBAI

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 1531/MUM/2016[1998-99]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 May 2018AY 1998-99

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri Ramit Kochar, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Anil SatheFor Respondent: Shri M.C. Omi Ningshen
Section 11Section 271(1)(c)

penalty of Rs. 19,32,534/- 4 ITA.NO.1529 & 1531/MUM/2016 (A.Ys. 2003-04 & 1989 – 99) Prabodhan Prakashan. for the A.Y. 2007-08 and Rs. 18,62,354/- for the A.Y. 2008- 09 u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 4. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the AO before the learned CIT(A). It is found

ITO (E) 2(2), MUMBAI vs. PRABHODHAN PRAKASHAN, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are dismissed

ITA 3833/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jan 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad () & Shri N.K. Pradhan ()

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Ojha, DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil Sathe, AR
Section 11Section 12ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty of Rs. 19,32,534/- for the A.Y. 2007-08 and Rs. 18,62,354/- for the A.Y. 2008- 09 u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 4. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the AO before the learned CIT(A). It is found by the learned CIT(A) that the assessee trust was granted registration u/s

ITO (E) 2(2), MUMBAI vs. PABODHAN PRAKASHAN, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals are dismissed

ITA 3831/MUM/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jan 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri C. N. Prasad () & Shri N.K. Pradhan ()

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Ojha, DRFor Respondent: Shri Anil Sathe, AR
Section 11Section 12ASection 271(1)(c)

penalty of Rs. 19,32,534/- for the A.Y. 2007-08 and Rs. 18,62,354/- for the A.Y. 2008- 09 u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act. 4. The assessee preferred appeal against the order of the AO before the learned CIT(A). It is found by the learned CIT(A) that the assessee trust was granted registration u/s

VIJAY B SHAH (HUF),,MUMBAI vs. ITO-17(3)(5),, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 913/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Mar 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blevijay B Shah (Huf) V. Income Tax Officer – 17(3)(5) Room No.137 12A Giriraj Building Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road St Road, Carnac Bunder Mumbai – 400 020 Mumbai – 400 092 Pan: Aabhv7438J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : None Department By : Smt Samatha Mullamuddi

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Smt Samatha Mullamuddi
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 271Section 271(1)(c)

12A Giriraj Building Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road St Road, Carnac Bunder Mumbai – 400 020 Mumbai – 400 092 PAN: AABHV7438J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : None Department by : Smt Samatha Mullamuddi Date of Hearing : 26.02.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 13.03.2020 O R D E R PER C.N. PRASAD (JM) 1. This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned

MUMBAI EDUCATIONAL TRUST,BANDRA RECLAMATION vs. DCIT (EXEM) - 2, MUMBAI, PEDDER ROAD

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2530/MUM/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Dec 2024AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Respondent: Shri R.R. Makwana, Rs. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

u/s 271(1)(c) on the basis of notice us 274 r.ws 271(1)(c) wherein no specific charge of either tiling of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income was mentioned and thereby passing the order of penalty which is to be quashed as per recent judgement of Bombay High Court and Supreme Court. 2. The assessee is a charitable

FAYZ E HUSAYNI TRUST,MUMBAI vs. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE (NAFC) DELHI , MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3048/MUM/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Feb 2024AY 2017-18
Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 270ASection 274

12A of the Act and also it is\nregistered with Charity Commissioner, Mumbai. The assessee is\nengaged in the charitable activities. The main object of the trust is to\narrange and provide assistance and facilities to pilgrims visiting holy\nplaces such as Mecca and Madina etc., the other objects includes\nproviding housing, medical and educational facilities and general charity

MUMBRA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,THANE vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) THANE, DY. CIT (CENTRAL CIRCLE) - 1 THANE, THANE

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 379/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh S. Athavale,ARFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr.AR)
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 139Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust engaged in running various educational institutions. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee did not file any return of income since AY 2012-13. A survey u/s 133A of the Act was conducted

MUMBRA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,THANE vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS) - THANE, DY. CIT (CENTRAL CIRCLE) - 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 377/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh S. Athavale,ARFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr.AR)
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 139Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust engaged in running various educational institutions. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee did not file any return of income since AY 2012-13. A survey u/s 133A of the Act was conducted

MUMBRA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,THANE vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS) - THANE, DY. CIT (CENTRAL CIRCLE) - 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 374/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh S. Athavale,ARFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr.AR)
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 139Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust engaged in running various educational institutions. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee did not file any return of income since AY 2012-13. A survey u/s 133A of the Act was conducted

MUMBRA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,THANE vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS), THANE, DY. CIT (CENTRAL CIRCLE) - 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 378/MUM/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh S. Athavale,ARFor Respondent: Shri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr.AR)
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 139Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income tax Act. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust engaged in running various educational institutions. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee did not file any return of income since AY 2012-13. A survey u/s 133A of the Act was conducted

MUMBRA SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,THANE vs. ITO (EXEMPTION) - THANE, DY. CIT (CENTRAL CIRCLE) - 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\npartly allowed

ITA 376/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: \nShri Rajesh S. Athavale, ARFor Respondent: \nShri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr.AR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income\ntax Act.\n\n3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust engaged in\nrunning various educational institutions. The Assessing Officer found\nthat the assessee did not file any return of income since AY 2012-13. A\nsurvey u/s 133A of the Act was conducted

MUMBRA SHIKHSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL,THANE vs. ITO (EXEMPTIONS) - THANE, DY. CIT (CENTRAL CIRCLE) - 1, THANE, THANE

In the result, all the above appeals of the assessee are\npartly allowed

ITA 375/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2025AY 2016-17
For Appellant: \nShri Rajesh S. Athavale, ARFor Respondent: \nShri Leyaqat Ali Aafaqui, (Sr.AR)
Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 147Section 148Section 271(1)(c)

penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income\ntax Act.\n\n3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Trust engaged in\nrunning various educational institutions. The Assessing Officer found\nthat the assessee did not file any return of income since AY 2012-13. A\nsurvey u/s 133A of the Act was conducted

INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI vs. MUNIWAR ABAD CHARITABLE TRUST, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3559/MUM/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B R Baskaran & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanito, Vs. Muniwar Abad Charitable 618, Mtnl Cumballa Hill Telephone Trust, Exchange Building, Peddar Road, 405A, 407, Jolly Bhavan No. 1, Maharashtra – 400 026 10, New Marine Lines, Churchgate, Mumbai-400 020 Pan: Aaatm0140K (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 11Section 11(2)Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 276C

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “the Act”] dated 21.05.2024 for the A.Y. 2012-13. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a Charitable Trust registered with the Directorate of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai u/s 12A of the Act. Assessee has filed its return of income

CREDIT GUARANTEE FUND TRUST FOR MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISES ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT EXEMPTION-1(1), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 179/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Hon’Ble Shri Prabhash Shankarcredit Guarantee Fund Vs. Dcit(E) – 1(1) Trust Mumbai. 1St Floor, Sidbi Swavalaman Bhavan, Avenue – 3, Lane 2, G-Block, Bkc, Bandra (E) Pan/Gir No. Aaatc2613D (Applicant) (Respondent)

Section 11(1)(a)Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 2(24)Section 2(24)(iia)Section 250

12A for exemption u/s 11. The CIT rejected the application on the ground that (a) the objects showed a profit motive, (b) the assessee was charging an interest rate which was higher than that charged by banks & (c) the activity of giving loans was a business activity and not a "charitable purpose" u/s 2(15). On appeal by the assessee

PEGASUS PROPERTIES P. LTD.,PUNE vs. DY CIT, CC-2(3), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 943/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Rajan VoraFor Respondent: Shri Dhramveer Singh
Section 153Section 153ASection 153CSection 22Section 23Section 23(4)

penalty proceedings on the above u/s 271(1)(c).” 5. The assessee has raised several issues in the above grounds of appeal and we shall deal the above issues raised by the assessee ground wise. 6. Ground No.1 is general in nature and needs no adjudication. Accordingly, ground No.1 is dismissed. 7. Coming to Ground Nos. 2 to 12 which

SHI vs. HAMBHO NARAYAN TRUST,MUMBAIVS.DDIT (EXEMPTION) 1(2), MUMBAI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3029/MUM/2016[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Apr 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.3029/Mum/2016 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2005-06) बिाम/ M/S. Shivshambho Narayan Ddit (Exmp) 1(2) Trust, 5T H Floor, Geetai Chs Ltd., Piramal Chambers , V. 716/744, Pandhare Chawl Parel, Lal Baug, Compound, Mumbai 400013 Dagdi Chawl, B.J Marg, Byculla (W), Mumbai 400011 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aadts8307B (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri K. Shivram and Ms.Neelam C. JadhavFor Respondent: Shri. V Justin
Section 1Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 151

section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Hence , notice U/s 148 of I T Act, 1961 is being issued to the assessee" ????? ????? alongwith the following documents :- I. Copy of the Notice u/s 148 dated 27.03,2012 II. Copy of the first page of the return of income for A.Y.2005-06 in Form No. 3A showing NIL Income after claiming exemption