BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “house property”+ Section 158Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore39Delhi25Hyderabad23Chandigarh23Jaipur18Kolkata13Lucknow9Mumbai9Pune8Nagpur6Karnataka5Chennai3SC2Rajkot2Visakhapatnam1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Telangana1Indore1

Key Topics

Section 153A12Addition to Income7Section 143(3)6Section 1326Section 69C6Section 132o2Section 153C2Section 153A(1)(a)2Section 115J2

SYNCHEM CHEMICALS (INDIA) P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 10(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2753/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Apr 2021AY 2010-11
Section 10Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 2(47)Section 45

house property.” 6. “On the facts and circumstances of the case and in the law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the addition of notional interest on interest free deposit received by the assessee on Ankleswar factory and Santacruz property.” 7.1. “On the facts and circumstance so the case and in the law, the Ld. CIT(A) failed

VAISHNAV S.PURI (HUF),MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT 19(3), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Business Income2
House Property2
ITA 3259/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Nov 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri B. R. Baskaran & Amarjit Singh] आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.3259/Mum/2013

For Respondent: Mohammed Rizwan
Section 153A

house property?” It is argued in view of the said circumstance, it is apparent that identical question of law is pending for decision before the Hon’ble High Court, 3 Assessment Year: 2009-10 therefore, an order under sub-section 3 of Section 158B

DCIT CC 7(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S TRISHUL REALTY INFRA PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the cross objection filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4041/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)

property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment.” 9.2 Further, coming to the issue about statements recorded u/s.132(4) whether they constitute incriminating material or not, we observe that although such statements possess evidentiary value and have relevance as contemplated by the Act, such

DCIT 7(3), MUMBAI vs. M/S TRISHUL REALTY INFRA PVT LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the cross objection filed by the assessee is allowed and the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 4042/MUM/2019[201-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2021

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh MehtaFor Respondent: Shri Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(a)

property discovered in the course of search which were not produced or not already disclosed or made known in the course of original assessment.” 9.2 Further, coming to the issue about statements recorded u/s.132(4) whether they constitute incriminating material or not, we observe that although such statements possess evidentiary value and have relevance as contemplated by the Act, such

SHRI AVINASH NIVRUTTI BHOSALE,PUNE vs. DY CIT CENTRAL CIR-2(3), MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 531/MUM/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Jul 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Gagan Goyal & Shri Avinash Nivrutti Bhosale, 2, Abil House, Ganesh Khind Road, Range Hill Corner, Pune-411 007 ...... Appellant Vs. Dcit Cent. Cir 2(3) 8Th Floor, R. No. 803, Old Cgo Bldg, Pratistha Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 Pan – Abtpb8151F ..... Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agarwal, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Smt. Shailja Rai, Ld. DR
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 250

House, Ganesh Khind Road, Range Hill Corner, Pune-411 007 ...... Appellant Vs. DCIT Cent. Cir 2(3) 8th floor, R. No. 803, Old CGO Bldg, Pratistha Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 PAN – ABTPB8151F ..... Respondent Appellant by : Shri Madhur Agarwal, Ld. AR Respondent by : Smt. Shailja Rai, Ld. DR Date of hearing : 19/05/2023 Date of pronouncement : 10/07/2023 PER GAGAN

SHRI AVINASH NIVRUTTI BHOSALE,PUNE vs. DY CIT CENTRAL CIR-2(3, MUMBAI

Accordingly, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 529/MUM/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jan 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 132Section 132oSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 69C

House, Ganesh KhindRoad 8th Floor, Room No. 803 Range Hill Corner, Pune – 411007 Old CGO Bldg, Pratishtha Bhavan M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 PAN: ABTPB8151F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented by Shri Vijay Mehta & : Shri Mandar Joshi Department Represented by : Shri R.S. Srivastav Date of Hearing : 17.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 18.01.2023 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN

SHRI AVINASH NIVRUTTI BHOSALE,PUNE vs. DY CIT CENTRAL CIR-2(3), MUMBAI

Accordingly, this appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 530/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Jan 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 132Section 132oSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 69C

House, Ganesh KhindRoad 8th Floor, Room No. 803 Range Hill Corner, Pune – 411007 Old CGO Bldg, Pratishtha Bhavan M.K. Road, Mumbai - 400020 PAN: ABTPB8151F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented by Shri Vijay Mehta & : Shri Mandar Joshi Department Represented by : Shri R.S. Srivastav Date of Hearing : 17.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 18.01.2023 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN

ITO 2(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. SATURN ADVISORY SERVICES P.LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 802/MUM/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri G. Manjunathaassessment Years: 2006-07 Income Tax Officer-2(3)(2), M/S Saturn Advisory Room No. 518A, Services Pvt. Ltd., बनाम/ Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, 44, Strategic House, Vs. Mumbai-400020 Mint Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती/Assessee) Pan No.:-Aajcs2674N

Section 143(1)

house over and above the investment disclosed in VDIS. On the basis of the DVO's report, the AO made an addition of Rs. 2,24,08,820. 4. On an appeal being filed by the respondent-assessee, the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [for short CIT(A)] allowed the same and deleted the addition made

M/S EKTA HOUSING PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY. CIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-6(2), MUMBAI

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1732/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 May 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.Rifaur Rahman () & Shri Ravish Sood ()

housing project, viz. “California” in the period relevant to A.Y 2016-17 hence, the A.O was not correct in assessing the on- money of Rs. 29 lac received by the assessee w.r.t Flat No. 1101 in the said project in A.Y 2013-14. It was submitted by the ld. A.R that as the assessee was following the project completion method