BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “house property”+ Section 142Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh38Delhi38Agra19Jaipur17Bangalore14Indore11Hyderabad10Mumbai9Chennai9Raipur9Pune8Kolkata7Cochin5Ahmedabad5Lucknow4Jodhpur3Varanasi3Visakhapatnam2Karnataka1Cuttack1SC1Surat1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 14817Section 1519Section 143(3)7Section 1476Reopening of Assessment5Section 2634Section 69B4Addition to Income4Reassessment4

MOUNT VIEW CLUB & RESORTS P. LTD,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO 10(3)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05 are allowed and the appeals for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 are partly allowed

ITA 1358/MUM/2011[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं /I.Ta Nos.1358 To 1360 & 1362/Mum/2011 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2003-04 To 2006-07 M/S. Mount View Club & The Ito-10(3)(4), बनाम/ Resorts Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai Vs. 27, Mahavir Centre, Sector-17, Vashi Navi Mumbai "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaccm 5353M (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By: Shri Prakash Pandit Shri Asghar Zain Vp ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By:

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Pandit
Section 142ASection 143(3)Section 148Section 263Section 69B

house property” as against “Income from business” reported for the assessee. In the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer by letter dated 23.2.2007 referred the valuation of cost of construction of assessee’s property at village Vinegaon, Raigad District for valuation and obtained valuation report on 21.8.2008 after completion of assessment on 17.12.2007. Subsequently

Section 55A3
Section 142A3
House Property3

DCIT-CC-7(3), MUMBAI , MUMBAI vs. SHRI MAJNI KARAMSHI PATEL, MUMBAI

In the result, the cross objections of the assessee and the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6128/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Gagan Goyal, Accountat Member Dcit, Cc-7(3) Vs. Shri Manji Karamshi Room No. 655, Patel Aayakar Bhavan, Office No. 1, Patel M.K.Road, Bhavan-29, Vijaywadi, Mumbai.-400020. Dr. Nagindas N Shah Lane Chira Bazar, Mumbai – 400002. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpp0130D Appellant .. Respondent Co No. 45/Mum/2021 (A.Y: 2014-15) Shri Manji Karamshi Vs. Dcit, Cc-7(3) Patel Room No. 655, Aayakar Office No. 1, Patel Bhavan, Bhuvan-29, Vijaywadi, M.K .Road, Dr. Nagindas N Shah Mumbai-400002. Lane Chira Bazar, Mumbai – 400002. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aabpp0130D Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Shri.Rushab Mehta.ARFor Respondent: Shri .T .Shankar.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 68

House International (P) Ltd ITA No.112/2018 against which the SP of the revenue was also dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. I find merit in the contention of the appellant. The AO has doubted the creditworthiness and capacity of the lender companies to raise share capital and premium solely on the ITA No. 6128/Mum/2019 & Co. No. 45/Mum/2021 Shri Majni

ACADEMY FOR GLOBAL EDUCATION SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed

ITA 3860/MUM/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaraassessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, SR. D.R
Section 133(6)Section 250

House, Broker Ltd. Mumbai- 400004 10 Sar 7, Prem AAFCS1 6250 10 62500 390 2437500 2500000 Engineerin Bhavan, 2nd 836G g Ltd Floor, 234/236, Narshi Nath Street, Masiid Bandert 11 Duralloy 105, AABCD 6250 10 62500 390 2437500 2500000 Cutters Ltd Churchgate 4127B Chamber, 5, Sir Vithaldas Thackersay Road Marine Lines, Mumbai- 400020 12 Rigveda 105, AAACR

SMT. MONICA CHATTOPADHYA,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-28(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2369/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Hon'Ble & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Blesmt. Monica Chattopadhya V. Acit – Circle – 28(2) 321, Reena Complex Tower No. 6 R.N. Road, Vidyavihar (W) Vashi Railway Commercial Complex Navi Mumbai-400703 Mumbai – 400086 Pan: Ajipc1975D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Malav P. Sheth Department By : Mahita Nair

For Appellant: Malav P. ShethFor Respondent: Mahita Nair
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 54

Housing Society, Hyderabad. Subsequently valuation report from the DVO dated 08.10.2018 was received wherein the construction cost of the immovable property at Plot No. 252, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad is valued at ₹.2,51,500/- against the claim of the assessee at ₹.8 lakhs. Accordingly, notice u/s. 154 of the Act dated 11.04.2019 was issued to the assessee to recompute

ACC LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3135/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

House, 121, M.K. Road World Trade Centre, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400005 PAN: AAACT1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee represented by : Shri Yogesh Thar & Ms. Sukanya Jayaram Department represented by : Smt. Shailja Rai Date of Hearing : 21.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 28.02.2023 2 ITA NO.3135& 3136/MUM/2019 (A.Y: 2009-10) M/s. ACC Limited O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN

DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI vs. ACC LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3176/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

House, 121, M.K. Road World Trade Centre, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400005 PAN: AAACT1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee represented by : Shri Yogesh Thar & Ms. Sukanya Jayaram Department represented by : Smt. Shailja Rai Date of Hearing : 21.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 28.02.2023 2 ITA NO.3135& 3136/MUM/2019 (A.Y: 2009-10) M/s. ACC Limited O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN

ACC LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT(LTU) - 1, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3136/MUM/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 55A

House, 121, M.K. Road World Trade Centre, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-400005 PAN: AAACT1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee represented by : Shri Yogesh Thar & Ms. Sukanya Jayaram Department represented by : Smt. Shailja Rai Date of Hearing : 21.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 28.02.2023 2 ITA NO.3135& 3136/MUM/2019 (A.Y: 2009-10) M/s. ACC Limited O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN

ITO 14(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. SUNIL GHANSHYAMDAS VERLIANI, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3813/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Nov 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Ashwani Taneja, Am Income Tax Officer Shri Sunil Ghanshyamdas 14(1)(2), 2Nd Floor, Earnest Verliani House, Nariman Point, Mumbai- C/O M/S Sunil Enterprise 138, Vs. 400021. Vitthalwadi, Opp. Vithoba Mandir, Mumbai-400002. Pan No.Aabpv3351J .. Appellant Respondent Revenue By .. Shri T.A Khan, Dr .. Assessee By Shri Vimal Punmiya, Ar Date Of Hearing .. 28-11-2016 .. Date Of Pronouncement 28-11-2016 O R D E R

Section 142ASection 56(2)(vii)Section 59BSection 69B

house property. For this Revenue has raised following three grounds: - “1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Id. CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.1,48,40,000/- as unrecorded investments made u/s 59B, on the basis of DVO's report, after having accepting the finding

ITO 2(3)(2), MUMBAI vs. SATURN ADVISORY SERVICES P.LTD, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 802/MUM/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Sept 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri G. Manjunathaassessment Years: 2006-07 Income Tax Officer-2(3)(2), M/S Saturn Advisory Room No. 518A, Services Pvt. Ltd., बनाम/ Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, 44, Strategic House, Vs. Mumbai-400020 Mint Road, Fort, Mumbai-400001 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती/Assessee) Pan No.:-Aajcs2674N

Section 143(1)

section for determining the consideration actually received by the assessee would be applicable in all its rigour in such cases. This condition of 15% or more difference is merely intended to be a safeguard against the undue hardship which would be occasioned to the assessee if the inflexible rule of thumb enacted in sub-s. (2) were applied in marginal