BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

184 results for “depreciation”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai184Delhi132Bangalore72Chennai70Ahmedabad56Pune35Kolkata33Jaipur15Lucknow15Chandigarh10Hyderabad9Indore9Cuttack7Ranchi6Amritsar5Rajkot4Visakhapatnam4SC3Cochin3Jodhpur2Raipur2Surat2Karnataka1Agra1Guwahati1Telangana1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 80G130Section 143(3)78Section 12A64Addition to Income59Deduction56Disallowance54Section 1148Section 80I47Depreciation44Section 263

JEWELEX INDIA PRIAVTE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-14(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 5285/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankarjewelex India Private V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of Limited बनाम Income Tax, Circle – 401 Trade Centre, Bandra 14(1)(1), Aayakar Bhavan, Kurla Complex, Bandra Maharishi Karve Marg, (East), Mumbai – 400 098, Mumbai – 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aabcj4523H Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, ARFor Respondent: Ms. Kavitha Kaushik, (Sr. DR)
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 37Section 37(1)Section 43(6)(c)Section 80G

80G out of CSR expenses are in accordance with the decisions of various benches of Tribunal. Thus, the view taken by assessing officer cannot be said to be erroneous. Thus, the pre-requisite twin conditions for exercising jurisdiction under section 263 has not meet out in the present case hence we quash / set aside the order of Pr. CIT dated

Showing 1–20 of 184 · Page 1 of 10

...
42
Section 14A29
Section 25028

DEUTSCHE INDIA PVT. LTD.(EARLIER KNOWN AS 'DBOI GLOBAL SERVICES PVT. LTD.),MUMBAI vs. ACIT-1(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for 16

ITA 2522/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri J.D. MistriFor Respondent: Ms. Neena Jeph (CIT-DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 92CSection 92D

depreciation and development rebate.  Section 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research and knowledge extension in natural and applied sciences under agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries. Payment to approved universities/research institutions orcompany also qualifies for deduction. In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section.  Section 35CCD provides deduction for skill development projects, which constitute the flagship

ICICI SECURITIES LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI -4, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3766/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jan 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SMT RENU JAUHRI (Accountant Member)

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 263Section 36(1)(iii)Section 37(1)Section 80G

80G, provided the statutory conditions thereof are satisfied. The Assessing Officer, having examined the claim and allowed the deduction, had taken a plausible and legally sustainable view. 31. In such circumstances, the learned Principal Commissioner could not have invoked section 263 merely because he held a different opinion on the matter. Substitution of one plausible view by another is impermissible

ACIT-6(1)(1), MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE AMC LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 792/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jul 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Narendra Kumar Billaiyashri Sandeep Singh Karhailaditya Birla Sun Life Amc Ltd., Tower 1, Jupiter Mill Compound, 17Th Floor, One World Center, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, ............... Appellant Mumbai - 400013 Pan : Aaacb6134D V/S

For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, CIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 250Section 40

depreciation and development rebate.  Section 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research and knowledge extension in natural and applied sciences under agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries. Payment to approved universities/research institutions or company also qualifies for deduction.  In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section.  Section 35CCD provides deduction for skill development projects, which constitute

ACIT, CIRCLE - 3 3 1, MUMBAI vs. JAMNAGAR UTILITIES AND POWER PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are allowed\npartly

ITA 5312/MUM/2024[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Dec 2025AY 2019-20
Section 115JSection 135Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 43ASection 80G

depreciation and development rebate.\nSection 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research\nand knowledge extension in natural and applied sciences under\nagriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries. Payment to approved\nuniversities/research institutions or company also qualifies for\ndeduction. In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section.\nSection 35CCD provides deduction for skill development projects,\nwhich constitute

ACIT, CIRCLE - 3 3 1, MUMBAI vs. JAMNAGAR UTILITIES AND POWER PVT LTD, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are allowed\npartly

ITA 5310/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Dec 2025AY 2020-21
Section 115JSection 135Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 43ASection 80G

depreciation and development rebate.\nSection 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research\nand knowledge extension in natural and applied sciences under\nagriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries. Payment to approved\nuniversities/research institutions or company also qualifies for\ndeduction. In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this Section.\nSection 35CCD provides deduction for skill development projects,\nwhich constitute

ABM KNOWLEDGEWARE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSESSING OFFICER CIRCLE 4(1)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed

ITA 3460/MUM/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Jul 2025AY 2020-2021
Section 135Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37Section 80G

80G by observing as under:\n11. Section 135 of Companies Act, 2013 requires companies with CSR\nobligations, with effect from 01/04/2014. Finance (No.2) Act,\n2014 inserted new Explanation 2 to sub- section (1) of section 37, so as\nto clarify that for purposes of sub- section (1) of section 37, any\nexpenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating

ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE AMC LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NFAC), DELHI

In the result, the appeal by the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 494/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Jul 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: Shri Ronak DoshiFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, CIT-DR
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 250Section 40

depreciation and development rebate.\n• Section 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research and\nknowledge extension in natural and applied sciences under agriculture, animal\nhusbandry and fisheries. Payment to approved universities/research institutions or\ncompany also qualifies for deduction.\n• In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section.\n• Section 35CCD provides deduction for skill development projects

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OSD IN SITU CIRCLE 131 , MUMBAI vs. TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are\ndismissed

ITA 216/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Mar 2025AY 2018-19
For Appellant: \nShri Niraj Sheth,ARFor Respondent: \nShri Hemanshu Joshi (Sr. DR)
Section 135Section 135(5)Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80G(1)(ii)

depreciation and development rebate.\n• Section 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research and knowledge\nextension in natural and applied sciences under agriculture, animal husbandry and\nfisheries. Payment to approved universities/research institutions or company also\nqualifies for deduction. In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section.\nJamnagar Utilities and Power Pvt. Ltd Section 35CCD •provides deduction

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OSD IN SITU CIRCLE 131, MUMBAI vs. TATA CAPITAL HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, both the appeals of the Revenue are\ndismissed

ITA 195/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai18 Mar 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: \nShri Niraj Sheth,ARFor Respondent: \nShri Hemanshu Joshi (Sr. DR)
Section 135Section 135(5)Section 143(3)Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80G(1)(ii)

depreciation and development rebate.\n• Section 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research and knowledge\nextension in natural and applied sciences under agriculture, animal husbandry and\nfisheries. Payment to approved universities/research institutions or company also\nqualifies for deduction. In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section.\nJamnagar Utilities and Power Pvt. Ltd Section 35CCD •provides deduction

SYNERGIA LIFESCIENCES PVT LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-ASSESSMENT UNIT, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 938/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jun 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Rashmikant C. Modi a/wFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Das
Section 115BSection 135Section 139(5)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 250Section 37(1)Section 80G

depreciation and development rebate.  Section 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research and knowledge extension in natural and applied sciences under agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries. Payment to approved universities/ research institutions or company also qualifies for deduction. In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section.  Section 35CCD provides deduction for skill development projects, which constitute

B. ARUNKUMAR CAPITAL & CREDIT SERVICES PVT LTD ,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed

ITA 2034/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Jul 2025AY 2020-21
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37(1)Section 80G

80G by observing as under:\n11. Section 135 of Companies Act, 2013 requires companies with CSR\nobligations, with effect from 01/04/2014. Finance (No.2) Act,\n2014 inserted new Explanation 2 to sub- section (1) of section 37, so as\nto clarify that for purposes of sub- section (1) of section 37, any\nexpenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating

ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MUMBAI vs. RELIANCE RETAIL LIMITED, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed, whereas the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4244/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (Vice President), SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR (Accountant Member)

Section 135Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 250Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80JSection 92C

80G would defeat the intent of Explanation 2 to section 37(1) of the Act. Accordingly, deduction of Rs. 10,53,00,000/- was disallowed. ii. Restriction of deduction under section 80JJAA The assessee claimed deduction under section 80JJAA amounting to Rs. 12,31,53,732/- which included deduction pertaining to earlier assessment years. The Assessing Officer held that deduction

GLITCH MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly\nallowed

ITA 2178/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Jul 2025AY 2020-21
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 234ASection 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 37(1)Section 40

80G by observing as under:\n11. Section 135 of Companies Act, 2013 requires companies with CSR\nobligations, with effect from 01/04/2014. Finance (No.2) Act,\n2014 inserted new Explanation 2 to sub- section (1) of section 37, so as\nto clarify that for purposes of sub- section (1) of section 37, any\nexpenditure incurred by an assessee on the activities relating

ABHAY ISPAT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, MUMBAI - 6, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3575/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Aug 2025AY 2020-21
For Appellant: Shri Gaurav KabraFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 37Section 37(1)Section 80G

80G of the Act was objected to on a similar basis as in the present\ncase. While deciding the issue in favour of the taxpayer, the Bangalore Bench\nof the Tribunal, vide order dated 29/04/2020, observed as follows:\n\"We have perused submissions advanced by both sides in light of records\nplaced before us.\n10. Section 135 of Companies

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3(4),MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. LUBRIZOL INDIA PVT LTD, THANE

In the result, the appeal of the revenue bearing ITA No

ITA 5955/MUM/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Anikesh Banerjeeassistant Commissioner Of Vs Lubrizol India Pvt Ltd Income-Tax-3(4), Mumbai 9/3, Lubrizol India Private Limited- 5Th Room No.559, Floor, Plant, Thane Belapur Road, Turbhe Aayakar Bhavan, Churchgate Naka, Turbhe, Navi Mumbai, Thane- Mumbai-400 020 400 705 Pan: Aaacl0126H Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Paras Savla & Shri ShreyasFor Respondent: Shri Ram Krishn Kedia (SR DR)
Section 144BSection 147Section 250Section 32Section 32(1)(iia)Section 37Section 80G

depreciation amount to Rs.2,23,91,990/-. Further, the assessee claimed CSR expenses amount to Rs.1,.74,33,448/- U/s 37 of the Act and which was disallowed in the return of income. But the assessee claimed 50% of the expenses which comes to Rs.87,16,724/- under section 80G

ACIT CC 4 3, MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. MAERSK LINE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI

ITA 6166/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Vikram Singh Yadav & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Manish Kant, CAFor Respondent: Shri Virabhadra Mahajan, (Sr. DR)
Section 135Section 143(2)Section 206ASection 250Section 40Section 80G

depreciation and development rebate. • Section 35 grants deduction on expenditure for scientific research and knowledge extension in natural and applied sciences under agriculture, animal husbandry and fisheries. Payment to approved universities/research institutions orcompany also qualifies for deduction. In-house R&D is eligible for deduction, under this section. • Section 35CCD provides deduction for skill development projects, which constitute the flagship

AXIS FINANCE LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 6(1)2, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is hereby allowed

ITA 2922/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankaraxis Finance Limited, V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of Ground Floor Axis House, C-2 बनाम Income Tax– 6(1)(2), Wadia, International Center, Aayakar Bhawan, Mumbai P.B. Marg Worli, Prabhadevi, –400020, Maharashtra Mumbai–400 025, Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaack3010F Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agrawal,ARFor Respondent: Shri Aditya Rai (Sr. DR)
Section 135Section 143(3)Section 37Section 45Section 80G

section 45-IA of the Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) Act. The assessment order was passed determining total income at Rs.3,685,014,602/- by making disallowance/ addition of Rs 2,99,74,374/- and Rs 81,89,708/- in respect of CSR expenses and excess depreciation respectively. The assessee in the above grounds has agitated disallowance of CSR expenses

RELIANCE RETAIL LIMITED ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 8(1)(1), MUMBAI

ITA 3510/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Mar 2026AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Makarand Vasant Mahadeokar

Section 135Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 14ASection 250Section 37(1)Section 80GSection 80JSection 92C

80G would defeat the intent of Explanation 2 to section 37(1) of the Act. Accordingly, deduction of Rs. 10,53,00,000/- was disallowed. ii. Restriction of deduction under section 80JJAA The assessee claimed deduction under section 80JJAA amounting to Rs. 12,31,53,732/- which included deduction pertaining to earlier assessment years. The Assessing Officer held that deduction

WNS GLOBAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ASESSMENT UNIT, NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, NEW DELHI, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 4432/MUM/2024[AY 2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 May 2025

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Prabhash Shankarwns Global Services Private Vs Assessment Unit, National Faceless Limited, Mumbai Assessment Centre, New Delhi Pl-10/11, Gate No.4, Godrej- Boyce Complex, Pirojshanagar, L.B.S.Marg, Vikhroli (West), Mumbai-400 079 Pan: Aaacw2598L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: ShriPorus Kaka A/w Manish KanthFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar (CIT DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144CSection 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 253

depreciation claimed on intangible assets, namely customer contracts, customer relationships, and non-compete fees, is allowable under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Act. The impugned disallowance sustained by the Assessing Officer is hereby deleted. Accordingly, Ground no. 9 of the assessee’s appeal is allowed. Ground no. 10 : Deduction under section 80G