ACIT CC 4 3, MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. MAERSK LINE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had erred in granting relief on disallowances under Section 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia) without proper substantiation. The assessee's claim for deduction of CSR expenditure under Section 80G was also questioned.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the CIT(A)'s order which granted relief to the assessee regarding disallowances under Section 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had made provisions for expenses and reversed them, with suo moto disallowances for non-deduction of TDS.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in allowing provisions for expenses despite non-compliance with TDS provisions, and whether CSR expenditure is eligible for deduction under Section 80G.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 40(a)(i),Section 40(a)(ia),Section 206AA,Section 80G,Section 135
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV & SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL
PER SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, J.M. The Revenue has filed the present appeal against the impugned order dated 17.07.2025, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) – 52, Mumbai ["learned CIT(A)"], for the assessment year 2020-21. 2. In this appeal, the Revenue has raised the following grounds:
"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in granting relief to the assessee by allowing provisions for expenses under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, despite clear non-compliance with the provisions of C
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(i)
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
- DDIT(It)- 1(1), Mumbai vs M/S. American Express Bank Ltd., MumbaiITA 5667/MUM/2004[2000-01]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6199/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6198/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026