BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206C(6)clear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur39Chennai38Pune19Delhi16Cochin13Kolkata12Panaji10Rajkot9Dehradun8Bangalore8Jodhpur5Jaipur4Mumbai4Amritsar3Indore3Hyderabad3Ahmedabad1Lucknow1

Key Topics

Section 234E16Section 20016Section 200A8Section 200(3)8Section 1544Section 206C(3)4Section 200A(3)4Section 200A(1)(c)4Condonation of Delay

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1165/MUM/2024[2015-2016 (Q3)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

6. The Appellant has challenged the levy of fee under Section 234E of the Act for delay in filing the statement under Section 200 of the Act. Section 234E of the Act provides that where a person fails to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time prescribed in Section 200(3) or the proviso

4
Rectification u/s 1544

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1173/MUM/2024[2013-2014 (Q2)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

6. The Appellant has challenged the levy of fee under Section 234E of the Act for delay in filing the statement under Section 200 of the Act. Section 234E of the Act provides that where a person fails to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time prescribed in Section 200(3) or the proviso

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1185/MUM/2024[2015-2016 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: the Tribunal. 4. We would first take up ITA No. 1173/Mum/2024 [Financial Year 2012-13: Quarter 2/Form 27EQ] as the lead matter which has been preferred by the Assessee challenging the order, dated 2

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

6. The Appellant has challenged the levy of fee under Section 234E of the Act for delay in filing the statement under Section 200 of the Act. Section 234E of the Act provides that where a person fails to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time prescribed in Section 200(3) or the proviso

AGRAWAL DISTILLERIES PVT LTD,INDORE vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), DELHI

Appeal are allowed:

ITA 1181/MUM/2024[2014-2015 (Q1)]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jun 2024

Bench: SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Raj Singh Meel
Section 154Section 200Section 200(3)Section 200ASection 200A(1)(c)Section 200A(3)Section 206C(3)Section 234E

6. The Appellant has challenged the levy of fee under Section 234E of the Act for delay in filing the statement under Section 200 of the Act. Section 234E of the Act provides that where a person fails to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time prescribed in Section 200(3) or the proviso