BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 140Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Hyderabad24Karnataka23Delhi10Mumbai10Cochin6Kolkata5Chandigarh5Bangalore4Jaipur4Varanasi3Chennai3Raipur2Rajkot1SC1Ahmedabad1

Key Topics

Section 221(1)14Section 2216Section 140A(3)6Section 140A6Penalty5Section 1393Section 234B3Section 139(4)3Condonation of Delay3

DCIT 2(2)(1), MUMBAI vs. STATE BANK OF INDIA, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1360/MUM/2016[1995-96]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 May 2018AY 1995-96

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri N.K. Pradhanassessment Year: 1995-96 Dcit-2(2)(1), M/S State Bank Of India, R. No.545, Financial Reporting & बनाम/ Aayakar Bhavan Taxation Department, 3Rd Vs. M.K. Road, Floor, Corporate Centre, Mumbai-400020 State Bank Bhavan, Madam Cama Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400021 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती /Assessee) P.A. No. Aaacs8577K

Section 244ASection 51

condoned. 3. So far as, the issue of grant interest u/s 244A of the Act, the ld. counsel for the assessee, contended that this issue is covered by the decision of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the Assessment Year 2001-02 & 2002-03, vide order dated 31/08/2015 in ITA Nos.6817, 6818, 6823 & 6824/Mum /2012

A.C.I.T.-20(2), MUMBAI vs. NIRMAN CONSTRUCTIONS, MUMBAI

The appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 7265/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: Disposed
Section 1542
Addition to Income2
Limitation/Time-bar2
ITAT Mumbai
01 Mar 2016
AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Sanjay Aroraassessment Year:2007-08 Dcit-20(2), Vs M/S Nirman Constructions, 612, Piramal Chambers, 14, Nyay Sagar, Old Nagardas Lalbaug, Road, Near Chinoy College, Mumbai-400012 Andheri (East), Mumbai-400069 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती /Assessee) Pan. No.Aacfn8428K

Section 140ASection 140A(3)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(43)Section 221Section 234B

140A(3) r/w section 221 on 9th February 2010 after the completion of the assessment under section 143(3) of the Act vide order dated 30th December 2009. In response to the said notice, the assessee submitted and stated as under:– “Please refer to your above referred show cause notice dated 9th February 2010 which was received on 11th February

DCIT 17(2), MUMBAI vs. PRASHANT R. SAMDANI, MUMBAI

In the result the appeal filed by Revenue, and the C

ITA 1921/MUM/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Nov 2016AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.R.Baskaran & Shri Pawan Singh

For Appellant: Shri Pradip N. Kapasi (AR)For Respondent: Shri S.S.Kemwal (DR)
Section 140A(3)Section 221(1)Section 253

section 140A(3) of the Act. The AO directed the assessee to make the payment of self-assessment tax vide notice dated 09.11.2012. Along with the direction for self- assessment tax, a show-cause notice u/s 221(1) was also issued asking the assessee as to why penalty should not be levied. The assessee contested the proceedings and filed

KISHORE DESAI,MUMBAI vs. ACIT 17(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3071/MUM/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 May 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G S Pannu & Shri Sandeep Gosainassessment Year : 2011-12 Kishore Desai, Acit 17(1) 273/15 Khosla Bunder, Mumbai Vs. Darukhana, Mumbai 400 010

For Appellant: Shri Vipul J ShahFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Kumar
Section 140A(3)Section 221Section 221(1)

condone the delay in filing of the appeal. 4. In this background, both the parties were heard on merits of the issue. In brief, the relevant facts are that the assessee filed return of income on 09.08.2011 pertaining to A.Y. 2011-12, which was not accompanied by self-assessment tax payable at ` 5,06,837/-. In the penalty order

M/S. G M FABRICS P. LTD,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -9(3)(2), MUMBAI

Appeal is partly allowed

ITA 1095/MUM/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jul 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm M/S G.M. Fabrics P. Ltd. Dy. Cit Ground Floor, -9(3)(2) Dhana Singh Compound, Room No. 418, 4Th Floor, Andheri Kurla Road, Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Jb Nagar, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 058 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaach 2821 F

For Appellant: Ms Ritika Agarwal, ARFor Respondent: Shri Hoshang B. Irani, DR
Section 139(4)Section 139(9)Section 140ASection 221Section 221(1)Section 234B

140A of the Act. She submitted that the penalty could be levied only if the return is filed under Section 139 of the Act and assessee has not paid any tax due thereon. It was stated that when the return of income itself has been held as invalid, on such invalid return self assessment tax is not required

VINAY VIKRAM OBEROI,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO 22(3)4, NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for A

ITA 7157/MUM/2014[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2016AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sandeep Gosainshri Vinay Vikram Oberoi Income Tax Officer-22(3)-4 22, Punit Chambers Tower 6, 3Rd Floor Plot 769-C, Sector 18 Vs. Vashi Railway Station Complex Turbhe, Vashi Vashi, Navi Mumbai 400703 Navi Mumbai 400705 Pan - Aaapo2816L Appellant Respondent

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 221(1)

delay in payment of taxes should be condoned; 6. Moreover, the department had rightly exempted Transporters from deduction of TDS and hence accumulation of funds to make the payment of taxes (this being the first year of Payment of self- assessment tax) became unexpectedly difficult; 7. We seek the relief on the ground that in one the cases appealed before

TEHMINA K KATRAK CHARITABLE TRUST ,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 2(4), MUMBAI

ITA 549/MUM/2026[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Mar 2026AY 2021-22
Section 11Section 119Section 139Section 154Section 92E

delay (if\nany) is condonable.\n5. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have held that the rectification u/s 154\ndenying the trust exemption itself was without jurisdiction, and\nnot a 'mistake apparent from record'.\n6. Your Appellant prays that the Deputy Commissioner of Income\nTax, CPC, (DCIT) be directed to grant the exemption under\nSection 11 of The Income

SKYLARK BUILD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 4(2), MUMBAI

ITA 4370/MUM/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K

section 153C of LT. Act, 1961 can be initiated in respect to person other than searched only if incriminating material belonging to such person has been found and seized from the premises of person searched. No incriminating documents found at the person searched being M/s. Artefact Projects Ltd. no valid proceedings under section 153C of IT Act, 1961 could have

SKYLARK BUILD,MUMBAI vs. ASST CIT CEN CIR 4(2), MUMBAI

ITA 3237/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K

section 153C of LT. Act, 1961 can be initiated in respect to person other than searched only if incriminating material belonging to such person has been found and seized from the premises of person searched. No incriminating documents found at the person searched being M/s. Artefact Projects Ltd. no valid proceedings under section 153C of IT Act, 1961 could have

DCIT CEN CIR 4(2), MUMBAI vs. SUDHAKAR M. SHETTY, MUMBAI

ITA 2906/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Rajesh Kumarassessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/S. Skylark Build Acit, Central Circle-4(2) 402, Sagar Avenue 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan बनाम/ Plot B-54, Junction Of M.K.Road, Vs. Lallubhai Park & S.V. Road Mumbai 400020 Andheri (W), Mumbai 400058 ("नधा"रती /Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pan. No. Aazfs0404K

section 153C of LT. Act, 1961 can be initiated in respect to person other than searched only if incriminating material belonging to such person has been found and seized from the premises of person searched. No incriminating documents found at the person searched being M/s. Artefact Projects Ltd. no valid proceedings under section 153C of IT Act, 1961 could have