LATE SHRI JAYEESH THAR ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD KALYAN , KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

Charitable Trust. The relevant observations of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, for ease of reference, could be extracted in the following manner: - 6. We have heard learned Senior Counsel Mr.Kumar and Mr.A.Shankar, appearing for the appellants and Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel appearing for Income Tax Department. 7. We may at the outset record that, learned counsel appearing for both sides have

LATE JAYESH THAR ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN, KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

Charitable Trust. The relevant observations of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, for ease of reference, could be extracted in the following manner: - 6. We have heard learned Senior Counsel Mr.Kumar and Mr.A.Shankar, appearing for the appellants and Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel appearing for Income Tax Department. 7. We may at the outset record that, learned counsel appearing for both sides have

LATE JAYESH THAR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN, KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

Charitable Trust. The relevant observations of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, for ease of reference, could be extracted in the following manner: - 6. We have heard learned Senior Counsel Mr.Kumar and Mr.A.Shankar, appearing for the appellants and Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel appearing for Income Tax Department. 7. We may at the outset record that, learned counsel appearing for both sides have

LAWMEN CONCEPTS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-CPC-TDS , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

Charitable Trust. The relevant observations of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, for ease of reference, could be extracted in the following manner: - 6. We have heard learned Senior Counsel Mr.Kumar and Mr.A.Shankar, appearing for the appellants and Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned counsel appearing for Income Tax Department. 7. We may at the outset record that, learned counsel appearing for both sides have

THE UNIVERSITY OF MUMBAI,MUMBAI vs. ADDL. DIR. OF INCOME TAX-(EXEMPITION)-RG.-2, MUMBAI

In the result, assessee appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya (Am) & Shri Saktijit Dey (Jm)

Charitable and Educational Society in which the Delhi 'E' Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the penalty U/s. 272A(2)(e) urn cancelled on the ground that the assessee was not required to file the 'return U/s. 139(4A) in view off he its income being exempt U/s. 10(22). 6 The University of Mumbai The Delhi

MOHD. NAYEEM SIDDIQUI AKASH TIMBER TRADERS,THANE vs. DCIT (CPC), GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1.1 Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year [in short referred to as ‘AY’] 2013-14 contest the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-1, Thane [in short referred to as ‘CIT(A)’], Appeal No. ITA 348/2014-15 dated 14/06/2018 on following grounds of appeal: - 2 Assessment Year:2013-14 Mohd. Nayeem

SEAFARER'S WELFARE FUND SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT (TDS) RG 3, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajendra & Shri C.N. Prasadआयकर अपील सं /I.Ta No. 4568, 4569 & 4570/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2008-09 To 2010-11 Seafarer’S Welfare Fund The Addl. Cit (Tds), बनाम/ Scoeity, Range-3, Vs. Commerce House,1St Floor, Mumbai Curimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacts 6282J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By: Shri N.J. Jawker ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Kailash Gaikwad

E R PER C.N. PRASAD, JM: These three appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-14, Mumbai dated 9.4.2014 pertaining to assessment year 2008-09 to 2010-11 in confirming the levy of penalty u/s. 272A(2)(K) of the Act for delay in submission of TDS returns (quarterly). 2. Brief facts

SEAFARER'S WELFARE FUND SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT (TDS) RG 3, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajendra & Shri C.N. Prasadआयकर अपील सं /I.Ta No. 4568, 4569 & 4570/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2008-09 To 2010-11 Seafarer’S Welfare Fund The Addl. Cit (Tds), बनाम/ Scoeity, Range-3, Vs. Commerce House,1St Floor, Mumbai Curimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacts 6282J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By: Shri N.J. Jawker ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Kailash Gaikwad

E R PER C.N. PRASAD, JM: These three appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-14, Mumbai dated 9.4.2014 pertaining to assessment year 2008-09 to 2010-11 in confirming the levy of penalty u/s. 272A(2)(K) of the Act for delay in submission of TDS returns (quarterly). 2. Brief facts

SEAFARER'S WELFARE FUND SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT (TDS) RG 3, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Rajendra & Shri C.N. Prasadआयकर अपील सं /I.Ta No. 4568, 4569 & 4570/Mum/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2008-09 To 2010-11 Seafarer’S Welfare Fund The Addl. Cit (Tds), बनाम/ Scoeity, Range-3, Vs. Commerce House,1St Floor, Mumbai Curimbhoy Road, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400 001 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aacts 6282J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Appellant By: Shri N.J. Jawker ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By: Shri Kailash Gaikwad

E R PER C.N. PRASAD, JM: These three appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-14, Mumbai dated 9.4.2014 pertaining to assessment year 2008-09 to 2010-11 in confirming the levy of penalty u/s. 272A(2)(K) of the Act for delay in submission of TDS returns (quarterly). 2. Brief facts