INDUR THANWERDAS DADLANI,MUMBAI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX PCIT, MUMBAI-42, MUMBAI
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed without any order as to cost
ITA 2476/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Aug 2025AY 2020-21
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankarindur Thanwerdas Dadlani Vs. Pr. Cit Flat No. 4604, The Imperial Mumbai – 42 Towers, Mp Mill Compound, Room No. 741, Aayakar Bb Nakashe Marg, Mardeo, Bhavan, Mk Road, Mumbai – 400034. Mumbai Pan/Gir No. Aacpd5262D (Applicant) (Respondent)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 263Section 57Section 74
144B of the Income Tax Act for A.Y.2020-21 should not be revised or set aside u/s. 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961."
Facts:- a) It is already noticed that the FAO had mentioned that, "In response to the notice assessee submitted a written submission along with supporting documents and details. The assessee uploaded various details, explanations and evidence
