BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

133 results for “TDS”+ Section 80P(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai133Bangalore57Raipur51Pune27Delhi23Visakhapatnam18Kolkata17Ahmedabad11Chennai9Surat9Lucknow8Jaipur8Cochin7Nagpur6Karnataka5Jodhpur2Indore2Rajkot2Amritsar1Kerala1Hyderabad1Panaji1Varanasi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 194A291Section 201(1)252Section 194A(3)(v)194Section 201106Section 2(19)104TDS91Section 25057Exemption56Section 80P47Section 80P(2)(d)

DHANVARSHA NAGARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA LIMITED,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 28(1)(3), NAVI MUMBAI

ITA 1599/MUM/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2024AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

TDS u/s 194H without looking\nat the Jurisdictional Bombay High Court's decision in case of\nCIT v. Sunil Vishwambharnath Tiwari (2016), 388 ITR\n630(Bom), wherein appellant is entitled to claim deduction for\nenhancement of gross total income because of disallowance of\nexpenditure u/s 40(a)(ia).\n5.\nThe appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, amend, or\nsubstitute

Showing 1–20 of 133 · Page 1 of 7

39
Deduction39
Addition to Income16

DHANVARSHA NAGRI SAHAKARI PATASANTHA LIMITED,NAVI MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 28(1)(3), NAVI MUMBAI

Accordingly, in view of paragraph 10 to 15 above, disallowance of INR.32,63,969/- is deleted and claim of deduction under Section 80P of the Act as made by the Appellant is allowed

ITA 1600/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: the Tribunal. Therefore, the delay of 22 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 4. We note that the Appellant has raised the following grounds in the

For Appellant: Shri Vijaykumar ShindeFor Respondent: Shri R. R. Makwana
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 40Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

TDS u/s 194H without looking at the Jurisdictional Bombay High Court's decision in case of CIT v. Sunil Vishwambharnath Tiwari (2016), 388 ITR 630(Bom), wherein appellant is entitled to claim deduction for enhancement of gross total income because of disallowance of expenditure u/s 40(a)(ia). 5. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify, amend, or substitute

MAKER TOWER F PREMISES CO-OP SOC. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX - CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1362/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Jul 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Ms Vasanti PatelFor Respondent: Shri Surendra Meena, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80P(2)(d)

b) ..... (c) ..... (d) in respect of any income by way of interest or dividends derived by the co- operative society from its investments with any other co-operative society, the whole of such income;” 8. Thus, for the purpose of provisions of section 80P(2)(d) of the Act, two conditions are required to be cumulatively satisfied- (i) income

PREMIUM TOWER CO OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 24(3)(1), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 2436/MUM/2025[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Nov 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain

Section 250Section 80Section 80P(2)(d)

b) "primary co-operative agricultural and rural development bank" means a society having its area of operation confined to a taluk and the principal object of which is to provide for long-term credit for agricultural and rural development activities.] 7. Thus, assessee being a cooperative society cannot be reckoned as cooperative bank carrying out banking business

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (BYCULLA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6424/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": [ "Section 194A(1)", "Section 194A(3)(i)(b)", "Section 194A(3)(v)", "Section 194A(3)(viia)(b)", "Section 201(1)", "Section 201(1A)", "Section 271C", "Section 80P(2

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (KULA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6434/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": [ "Section 194A", "Section 250", "Section 201(1)", "Section 201(1A)", "Section 194A(3)(v)", "Section 194A(3)(i)(b)", "Section 194A(3)(viia)(b)", "Section 80P(2

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (MULUND BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6388/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000/-.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": [ "Section 194A(1)", "Section 194A(3)(i)(b)", "Section 194A(3)(v)", "Section 194A(3)(viia)(b)", "Section 201(1)", "Section 201(1A)", "Section 271C", "Section 80P(2

SHREE MALGANGADEVI SAHAKARI PATPEDHI MARYADIT,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 29, MUMBAI

Accordingly, the grounds raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1074/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai22 Nov 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 1074/Mum/2019 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15)

For Respondent: Shri Sushil Kumar Poddar
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

b. The main activities of patpedhi is to accept deposits from members in the form of recurring, saving A/c and Term Deposits and after retaining 10 to 30% of such amount has been utilizes for providing credit facilities to members only. By way of term loan for vehicles, housing and business and personal purpose within the frame work

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6407/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000/-.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": [ "Section 194A(1)", "Section 194A(3)(i)(b)", "Section 194A(3)(v)", "Section 194A(3)(viia)(b)", "Section 201(1)", "Section 201(1A)", "Section 80P(2

PALM COURT M PREMISES CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. ,MUMBAI vs. PR. CIT - 30, MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 561/MUM/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh () & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal ()

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 40Section 80P(2)(d)

TDS payments and thereby to frame the assessment de novo in accordance with law. Aggrieved by this, the assessee is in appeal before us. 6. The Ld.AR for the assessee contended that the assessee’s case was selected for limited scrutiny for the purpose of verification of (1) Income from heads of income other than business / profession mismatching; (2) Deduction

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ,(CHEMBUR BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6419/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

b) dealing with cooperative societies engaged in banking business are applicable and override the general exemption provided under Section 194A(3)(v). Therefore, the assessee was obligated to deduct TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs.10,000/-.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": ["Section 194A", "Section 201", "Section 250", "Section 80P(2

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (HILL ROAD BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6432/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS on interest to other Co-op. societies. On the\nother hand, the provisions of section 194A(3)(i)(b) and 194A(3)(viia)(b) of the Act\nare specific provisions dealing with Co-op. society engaged in carrying on business\nof banking. Therefore, we agree with the contention of the Id. Sr. DR that the\nspecific provisions of section

CIDCO EMPLOYEES CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,NAVI MUMBAI vs. WARD 28(1)(3), NAVI MUMBAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 700/MUM/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Aug 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Gagan Goyalcidco Employees Co-Op. Credit Society, Ground Floor, Cidco Bhavan, Cbd Belapur, Navi Mumbai – 400 614 Pan:Aaaac2203N ..... Appellant Vs. Ito Ward 28(1) (3)/ Nfac Delhi ..... Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra Shah, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri H. M. Bhatt, Ld. DR
Section 143Section 234BSection 250Section 271(1)Section 80Section 80P

80P of the Act, and the reason assigned are wrong and contrary to the facts and circumstances of the case. 1(c). In the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT [A] NFAC erred in confirming all the additions and dismissed all the grounds of the appellant. 2. The Id. AO erred in charging interest

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (AMBOLI BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO(TDS) 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6421/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

b), which deal with cooperative societies engaged in the business of banking, override the general exemption provided under Section 194A(3)(v). Therefore, the assessee was liable to deduct TDS.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": ["Section 194A", "Section 201(1)", "Section 201(1A)", "Section 80P(2

CITIZENCREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED (MAHIM BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS) WARD 1(1)(4), MUMBAI

Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 6440/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)

TDS on interest payments exceeding Rs. 10,000/-.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": ["194A(1)", "194A(3)(i)(b)", "194A(3)(v)", "194A(3)(viia)(b)", "201(1)", "201(1A)", "80P(2

CITIZEN CREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ( MULUND BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

ITA 6428/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS on interest to other Co-op. societies. On the\nother hand, the provisions of section 194A(3)(i)(b) and 194A(3)(viia)(b) of the Act\nare specific provisions dealing with Co-op. society engaged in carrying on business\nof banking. Therefore, we agree with the contention of the Id. Sr. DR that the\nspecific provisions of section

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (KALINA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

ITA 6400/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

b) of the Act, which deal with cooperative societies engaged in the business of banking, prevail over the general exemption provided under Section 194A(3)(v). Therefore, the assessee was liable to deduct TDS.", "result": "Dismissed", "sections": ["Section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961", "Section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961", "Section 201(1) of the Income

CITIZENCREDIT CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ( BORIVILI BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the results, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2376/MUM/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Jul 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Waglay,ARFor Respondent: Mr. Virabhadra S. Mahajan, (Sr. DR)
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201(1)

80P of the Act and consequently, it cannot avail the benefits of section 194A(3)(i) and section 194A(3)(v) of the Act. It also does not get any exemption u/s 194A(3)(iii)(a) which provides for exemption only if the income is credited or paid to any banking company or any cooperative society carrying on the business

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (COLABA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6390/MUM/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS on interest to other Co-op. societies. On the\nother hand, the provisions of section 194A(3)(i)(b) and 194A(3)(viia)(b) of the Act\nare specific provisions dealing with Co-op. society engaged in carrying on business\nof banking. Therefore, we agree with the contention of the Id. Sr. DR that the\nspecific provisions of section

CITIZEN CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD (VAKOLA BRANCH),MUMBAI vs. ITO (TDS)-1(1)(4), MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical\npurposes

ITA 6393/MUM/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 194ASection 194A(3)(v)Section 2(19)Section 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS on interest to other Co-op. societies. On the\nother hand, the provisions of section 194A(3)(i)(b) and 194A(3)(viia)(b) of the Act\nare specific provisions dealing with Co-op. society engaged in carrying on business\nof banking. Therefore, we agree with the contention of the Id. Sr. DR that the\nspecific provisions of section