LATE SHRI JAYEESH THAR ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD KALYAN , KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

206A; [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues: Provided that the amount of penalty

LATE SHRI JAYESH THAR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN , KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

206A; [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues: Provided that the amount of penalty

LAWMEN CONCEPTS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-CPC-TDS , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

206A; [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues: Provided that the amount of penalty

NATIONAL LAMINATE CORPORATION,MUMBAI vs. CPC (TDS), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

206A; 10 Assessment Year :2013-14 National Laminate Corporation [(m) to deliver or cause to be delivered a statement within the time as may be prescribed under sub-section (2A) of section 200 or sub-section (3A) of section 206C,] he shall pay, by way of penalty, a sum of one hundred rupees for every day during which the failure

SHEETAL SHELTERS P.LTD,MUMBAI vs. ITO 5(3)(2), MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh () & Shri G Manjunatha ()

TDS statements in Form 24Q within the time specified u/s 206 / 206A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 r.w.r. 37 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for the financial year 2010-11 which were required to be filed at the end of every quarter. The AO further noted that under the provisions of section

KETAN SEVANTILAL VAKHARIA,MUMBAI vs. ADDL CIT TDS RG 2, MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh () & Shri G Manjunatha ()

TDS statements in Form 24Q within the time specified u/s 206 / 206A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 r.w.r. 37 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962 for the financial year 2010-11 which were required to be filed at the end of every quarter. The AO further noted that under the provisions of section