ASIAN PIPES & PROFILES P. LTD,AMBERNATH vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by different assessees for different quarters relating to different years are allowed

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sanjay Garg

TDS statements filed for the period prior to 01.06.2015, late fees chargeable under section 234E of the Act could not be levied by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the intimation issued under section 200A

DISHA DISTRIBUTORS,MUMBAI vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

In the result, all the appeals filed by different assessees for different quarters relating to different years are allowed

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sanjay Garg

TDS statements filed for the period prior to 01.06.2015, late fees chargeable under section 234E of the Act could not be levied by the Assessing Officer (AO) in the intimation issued under section 200A

LATE JAYESH THAR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN, KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

TDS within the time prescribed u/s 200(3) or Section 206C(3). Section 200A deal with processing of statements of tax deducted

LATE SHRI JAYEESH THAR ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD KALYAN , KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

TDS within the time prescribed u/s 200(3) or Section 206C(3). Section 200A deal with processing of statements of tax deducted

LATE JAYESH THAR ,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN, KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

TDS within the time prescribed u/s 200(3) or Section 206C(3). Section 200A deal with processing of statements of tax deducted

LATE SHRI JAYESH THAR,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS, WARD KALYAN , KALYAN

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

TDS within the time prescribed u/s 200(3) or Section 206C(3). Section 200A deal with processing of statements of tax deducted

FORESIGHT HOLDINGS, MUMBAI vs. DCIT (TDS) CPC, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the assessee’s appeal for A

Bench: Shri Jason P. Boaz & Shri Sanjay Gargm/S. Foresight Holdings Dcit (Tds) Cpc #11, 2Nd Floor, Ismail Mansion Aayakar Bhavan Vs. 94/96/98 Bazargate, Fort Sector 3, Vyshali Mumbai 400001 Ghaziabad 201010 Pan – Aacff9466H Appellant Respondent

TDS), independent of the provisions of section 200A, for the default/delay in filing the TDS statements as prescribed under section

LAWMEN CONCEPTS PVT. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DCIT-CPC-TDS , MUMBAI

In the result, the appeal stands allowed to the extent indicated in the order

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

TDS within the time prescribed u/s 200(3) or Section 206C(3). Section 200A deal with processing of statements of tax deducted

SANJAY SATISHCHANDRA DUTT,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

TDS), independent of the provisions of section 200A, for the default/delay in filing the TDS statements as prescribed under section

MILESTONE SPACE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

TDS), independent of the provisions of section 200A, for the default/delay in filing the TDS statements as prescribed under section

MILSESTONE SPACE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, MUMBAI

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

TDS), independent of the provisions of section 200A, for the default/delay in filing the TDS statements as prescribed under section

SPRING TIME CLUBS & HOSPITALITY SERVICES P.LTD,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

TDS), independent of the provisions of section 200A, for the default/delay in filing the TDS statements as prescribed under section

MILESTONE ESTATE,KALYAN vs. A.O. TDS WD KALYAN, KALYAN

Appeals of the assessees are allowed as above

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Ram Lal Negi

TDS), independent of the provisions of section 200A, for the default/delay in filing the TDS statements as prescribed under section

PRINT PLUS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS CIRCLE, MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh & Shri Waseem Ahmedआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.6003/Mum/2018 "नधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2013-14 Print Plus Pvt. Ltd. Ito 122, Building No. A-2, Shah & Tds Circle, Central Vs. Nahar Industrial Estate, Processing Centre, S J Marg, Lower Parel, Mumbai Mumbai- 400013 Pan: Aaecp7030J

200A w.e.f. 1.6.2015. 4. Now coming to the facts of these cases, in the course of the processing of the TDS returns, the Assessing Officer (TDS) hereinafter referred to as the AO(TDS raised demand in each of the above cases by way of an intimation issued under section

NATIONAL LAMINATE CORPORATION,MUMBAI vs. CPC (TDS), MUMBAI

In the result, all the appeals of assessee are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

TDS within the time prescribed u/s 200(3) or Section 206C(3). Section 200A deal with processing of statements of tax deducted

MANISH C. JAIN,MUMBAI vs. CIT (A) -59, MUMBAI

Appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2014-15 Mr. Manish C. Jain (Prop. Cit(A)-59, Supreme Pharma), Mumbai बनाम/ 03Rd Floor, Block No.303 , Vs. Hira Building 44/52 Chapsi Bhimji Road, Mazgaon, Mumbai-400010 ("नधा"रती/Assessee) (राज"व /Revenue) Pa No.:-Aabpj9634N "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee By None राज"व क" ओर से / Revenue By Shri Suman Kumar-Dr

200A w.e.f. 1.6.2015. 4. Now coming to the facts of these cases, in the course of the processing of the TDS returns, the Assessing Officer 5 Mr. Manish C. Jain (TDS) [hereinafter referred to as the AO(TDS)] raised demand in each of the above cases by way of an intimation issued under section

MAHESH ANAND SONTAKKE,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC (TDS) GHAZIABAD, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kochar

200A w.e.f. 1.6.2015. 4. Now coming to the facts of these cases, in the course of the processing of the TDS returns, the Assessing Officer (TDS) [hereinafter referred to as the AO(TDS)] raised demand in each of the above cases by way of an intimation issued under section

MAHESH ANAND SONTAKKE,MUMBAI vs. DCIT CPC (TDS) GHAZIABAD, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are allowed as indicated above

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kochar

200A w.e.f. 1.6.2015. 4. Now coming to the facts of these cases, in the course of the processing of the TDS returns, the Assessing Officer (TDS) [hereinafter referred to as the AO(TDS)] raised demand in each of the above cases by way of an intimation issued under section